Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:08 pm
Yoink, *insert post that confuses everyone and adds nothing to the game*
I have to agree, I don't see a reason for the real Mason not to counterclaim by now unless Non is, in fact, the real Mason.NorwegianboyEE wrote:Because there is no counter claim?In post 581, Saladman27 wrote:Rn, I think the whole game is really getting heated up. I'd like to ask Norway why you're so confident the Non is the mason?
What are you referring to in particular?Datisi wrote:because game after game Salad lurks and posts "weird" posts that scum can flock to and get him lynched when i do think he's showing solving that people are missing and/or deliberately underplaying
What about Naerys?In post 584, Saladman27 wrote:Shotgun reads are (from town, null, scum)
Norway, Phoenix
Dat, Map, Non
Idk
Didn't see 603, nevermind.In post 605, Ph0enix wrote:What about Naerys?In post 584, Saladman27 wrote:Shotgun reads are (from town, null, scum)
Norway, Phoenix
Dat, Map, Non
Idk
What makes you think Non's not the Mason?In post 581, Saladman27 wrote:Rn, I think the whole game is really getting heated up. I'd like to ask Norway why you're so confident the Non is the mason?
What made you put Datisi from Town to null? The whole argument against Norway or something else?In post 584, Saladman27 wrote: Shotgun reads are (from town, null, scum)
Norway, Phoenix
Dat, Map, Non
Idk
So you also don't think it's Non, I'll assume? Why not?In post 596, Map Wolf wrote: I think I have an idea of who the mason is, but I still think the person should claim (at least before the end of the day), since we risk having scum claim mason tomorrow, leaving us in a bad spot.
No I think it's Non, but I could be wrong on that.In post 609, Ph0enix wrote:So you also don't think it's Non, I'll assume? Why not?In post 596, Map Wolf wrote: I think I have an idea of who the mason is, but I still think the person should claim (at least before the end of the day), since we risk having scum claim mason tomorrow, leaving us in a bad spot.
If you are town, then you don't need to defend yourself as much as explain your action/behavior to people. Trying to act like the game is lost just because you have people voting you is not really helpful to us.In post 603, Saladman27 wrote:Pretty much giving up on trying to defend myself. Only Naerys, Map and Dat are null. I'll check them later since it's 1 am.
You are similiar to GBJ in that you post some reads, but you don´t give any reasons.In post 603, Saladman27 wrote:Pretty much giving up on trying to defend myself.
okIn post 596, Map Wolf wrote:I don't like Saladman's posts. 575 comes off as defeatist, which I don't like.
Hm... if Saladman is green, that´d make Norwegian highly suspicious.In post 616, Datisi wrote:> Non not bothering to give reads
> main wagon still being the lynchbait
nice
Which tells, I don't know what you are referring to?In post 619, Naerys wrote:Hm... if Saladman is green, that´d make Norwegian highly suspicious.In post 616, Datisi wrote:> Non not bothering to give reads
> main wagon still being the lynchbait
nice
According to JEEP's Tells Norwegian or Phoenix could be scum ( i know these tells are not rlly considered valid anymore)
That at 3rd or 4th place in wagon could be scumIn post 620, Ph0enix wrote:Which tells, I don't know what you are referring to?In post 619, Naerys wrote:Hm... if Saladman is green, that´d make Norwegian highly suspicious.In post 616, Datisi wrote:> Non not bothering to give reads
> main wagon still being the lynchbait
nice
According to JEEP's Tells Norwegian or Phoenix could be scum ( i know these tells are not rlly considered valid anymore)
What tells are you finding on me?In post 619, Naerys wrote:According to JEEP's Tells Norwegian or Phoenix could be scum