Page 25 of 385
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 3:50 am
by Titus
I'm irritated you keep saying this. I don't want to play wifom with Ali. Not winding up in my pool =/= not drafted and I would expect you both to pass that logic test.
As for why AF's argument is wrong, bad content is worse than no content.
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 3:51 am
by Alisae
Can we talk about the masons more
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 3:52 am
by Titus
Only if they have red role pms with a factional nightkill.
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 3:54 am
by Reasonably Rational
In post 600, Titus wrote:
I'm irritated you keep saying this. I don't want to play wifom with Ali. Not winding up in my pool =/= not drafted and I would expect you both to pass that logic test.
As for why AF's argument is wrong, bad content is worse than no content.
Explain to me what I'm missing then. Seriously.
We're not on Alisae's team. We're not in your mason group. We significantly discount the idea that you didn't take any masons. I don't see how we end up in this position unless you just didn't want us. Your explanation that we'll clash but move beyond it is frustrating to me because of that one game that had multiple PTs. Space Dandy 2?
Like ... you're unimpeachable for obvious reasons. We kind of thought we would be also.
~D
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 3:54 am
by Bitmap
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 3:55 am
by Alisae
Thank you for your honesty!
Me and the scumteam will live and thrive off of this information for the rest of our lives
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 3:57 am
by Titus
Alright, let's suppose for sake if argument I take 3 masons. I must submit 7 names. I submit Adam, Brian, Charlie, Diana. Edward, Francine, and Georgia.
The mod excludes scum. Let's say Brian and Georgia are scum.
Three of Adam, Charlie, Diana, Francine, and George will be my masons. The mods pick randomly. I have no say.
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 3:58 am
by Titus
*The third George should be Edward but you get the point.
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 3:59 am
by Alisae
Ok so is anyone’s irl name Adam, Charlie, Diana, Francine, and Edward
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 3:59 am
by Bitmap
@Titus: WHY ARE YOU STILL TALKING ABOUT MASONS????????
Titus stop.
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:00 am
by Alisae
OH MY GOD
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:00 am
by Alisae
Can you stop??????
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:01 am
by Alisae
Its seriously annoying!
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:01 am
by Titus
I also have been pretty blunt, rationales for picking or not picking are in my PT. I can pro and con anyone.
@Bitmap, I'm not using real names chill. If anyone asks this on Day 2, I'll lynch them.
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:14 am
by Spiffeh
mason/drafting masons talk
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:18 am
by Titus
@Spiffeh, Welcome back. What was up with that Lord and Savior comment? That irked me. It's day one, which means I am weaker. Plus no one is that good.
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:19 am
by Reasonably Rational
Oof sorry Titus. I'm an idiot sometimes. The word "draft" made me think that you had a priority order on the people you submitted. But obviously (now that you explained and I carefully read the 2nd post) if it were that way you would know if someone was scum because your preference draft on them failed. Plz disregard earlier derpness.
~D
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:22 am
by Titus
In post 616, Reasonably Rational wrote:Oof sorry Titus. I'm an idiot sometimes. The word "draft" made me think that you had a priority order on the people you submitted. But obviously (now that you explained and I carefully read the 2nd post) if it were that way you would know if someone was scum because your preference draft on them failed. Plz disregard earlier derpness.
~D
Apology accepted. You'll still have to accept some side eye based on burden of proficiency though. You claimed you weren't a mason in the public thread after all, despite our years of playing together.
You also claimed not to read for detail. Again, that's not you like.
I'll need you to tell me who is scum.
~Titus
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:23 am
by Bitmap
I am schrodinger's mason.
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:26 am
by Titus
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:43 am
by Alisae
British Admiral Titus' got troops on the water
Thirty-two thousand troops in New York Harbor
Thirty-two thousand troops in New York Harbor
Thirty-two thousand troops in New York Harbor
When they surround our troops!
When they surround our troops!
When they surround our troops!
As a kid in the Caribbean
I wished for a war
I knew I was poor
I knew it was the only way to
Rise up!
If they tell my story
I am either gonna die
on the battlefield in glory or
Rise up!
I will fight for this land
but there's only one man
who can give us a command
so we can
Rise up!
Understand?
It's the only way to
Rise up! Rise up!
Here he comes
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:43 am
by Alisae
Here comes the general!
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:49 am
by Reasonably Rational
In post 617, Titus wrote: In post 616, Reasonably Rational wrote:Oof sorry Titus. I'm an idiot sometimes. The word "draft" made me think that you had a priority order on the people you submitted. But obviously (now that you explained and I carefully read the 2nd post) if it were that way you would know if someone was scum because your preference draft on them failed. Plz disregard earlier derpness.
~D
Apology accepted. You'll still have to accept some side eye based on burden of proficiency though. You claimed you weren't a mason in the public thread after all, despite our years of playing together.
You also claimed not to read for detail. Again, that's not you like.
I'll need you to tell me who is scum.
~Titus
I reject BoP. I frequently make (poor?) assumptions in games with mechanics new to me. This is demonstrable pretty much always.
Day one first 24 hours scum reads? From me? This should be hilariously good.
Alisae is totally scum this game. Have you SEEN the shitposting?
Scum in: {TSE, FL, FA, Espe, S&W} <--- they all have at least weak evidence in my thoughts so far. Generally takes more than that plus Cerb poking logic before I'm more certain though, and it's still pretty early his time.
~D
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:51 am
by Spiffeh
In post 615, Titus wrote:@Spiffeh, Welcome back. What was up with that Lord and Savior comment? That irked me. It's day one, which means I am weaker. Plus no one is that good.
Titus I am just leveraging your confirmed town status to further my agenda just let it happen
Hi RR I saw you said words to me I’ll get to them soon
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 5:02 am
by Pine
In post 586, Spiffeh wrote:I would like more votes on Sherlock and Watson
Idk how many there are currently but I still want more
As much as I want to punish TSE's bad behavior, I think you're right.
VOTE: Sherlock and Watson