Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 8:11 pm
Obviously
Yes but I wonder how we can differentiate between me and the other headIn post 584, Trojan Horses wrote:i like the idea of hydra signing through use of capitalization
In post 157, Trojan Horses wrote:Signing posts is for losers
I will do this but definitely not right now, I have 20 billion things to do today.In post 517, Wonderwalll wrote:It’s worth going back and looking at my towngames seeing as you’ve only played with scum!me tho, to try and get a baseline for how often I ask about stuff you think town wouldn’t care about
-wall
Same @RC
B/c you're scummy. These latest posts are not helping.In post 557, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Thats a town meta for you. And even then I've been sleeping with the dead for like the past 11 pages. Why you trying to push an easy lynch when Im not even aroundIn post 514, SirCakez wrote:Ftr I think Elmo is still the scummiest player in the game
In post 565, Baezu wrote:My scum reads are actually sircakez and jormun in my game and wonderwall and elmo in the other gameIn post 332, RadiantCowbells wrote:what do we all think about Baezu townreading a lot of people really early in the game?
??????????In post 562, Baezu wrote:I agreeIn post 329, SirCakez wrote:can game christmas start up an elmo wagon
DrDolittle wrote:jormengand doesnt look like scum at all?
Seems like an extremely lazy catch up hurr durr just for the sake of looking town.In post 609, Jormengand wrote: We Are Not Helping - is not helping. A large amount of their ISO is just memeing, and while Trojan was also memeing a little and going on about my avatar, Trojan was also actually doing work. Over a hundred posts in, WANH has posted meaningful content in a tiny minority of them, which to me comes off as slightly scummy.
FireMaPoka - does this player even have any posts? I don't think so, or at least I can't find them (PEDIT: Hey, I found out how to do ISOs without having to find an actual post by the player. Yeah, user has no posts.)
But this seems obnoxiously towncred grabbyIn post 609, Jormengand wrote:So on this side of the game, I'd like to see more analysis from most of the players, especially the ones who are scumreading players for no reason other than not having posted analysis yet (give us a chance, some of us are ill and/or multitasking. Also I prefer to wait until I have more to work with) - if you have got a scumread on someone, then you should have at least some reasoning to explain; if you have got the energy for a hundred and one posts, then post something useful. If someone doesn't have reads, I think they should get a chance to make some. I can tell you now that scumreading people just because they were slightly late to the party isn't helpful.
It's been stated by now, but this is both plainly suboptimal and plainly not happening even if it weren't.In post 21, jjh927 wrote:Either you lynch some scum and I win without actually doing anything of importance or you get to xylo and we start playing the game while putting yours on hold, using the comments from people in my game on your game to place everyone
This is the most objectively compelling evidence I have witnessed thus far.In post 64, RadiantCowbells wrote:how can you be zeus without thunder
VOTE: Trojan Horses
one scum found
I have to wonder why you are presenting this as some sort of spectacular insight when it should be in your role PM. It's certainly in mine.In post 50, mastina wrote:Also, did check the rules and from the sound of it, this isn't 2-2 with scum having one scumbuddy and not knowing the other team allowing them to have some semblance of legitimate scumhunting; it sounds like four groupscum, so take that into account. (I am also guessing that means only one nightkill from them each night.) It also sounds like we don't need to lynch two scum from our own game, so long as two scum die? I could be mistaken but it sounds like this game has a white flag mechanic where two scum dead = we win, period.
Although I am hesitant to label jjh as the blackened based on this alone, I generally agree.In post 160, RadiantCowbells wrote:if you say one more word about the playerlist I am going to scumread you for it
this seems like a really good way to create personality conflicts and given your team in TM had no qualms about abetting personality conflicts to win the normal I'm not putting it even slightly past you to be doing this deliberately to destroy town unity because that is objectively what shitting on half of the players in a game accomplishes
This guy has a good analytical head on his shoulders. Perhaps I can trust him to assist in my investigation. I am in the market for a new sidekick, after all.In post 181, SirCakez wrote:I would say this is valid for literally any players but mastinaIn post 165, BBmolla wrote:Not huge on Trojan Horse
RC Mastina pulled the whole “I read the rules so I know this thing about scum” and 9/10 it comes from scum trying to get Town cred
Who btw is just null rn all of this is well within both their town and scum meta
Anyways
BBmolla is town
RC is probably town
Elmo is scum players in Game Christmas should vote them
VOTE: Trojan horses
Their ISO is terrible
Excuse me, I just have to break character for this:In post 207, Trojan Horses wrote: I respect Mastina, and I agree withher explanations for reads. Which reads of hers doyoudisagree with and additionally think she has bad reasons for?
A curious response, but I suppose I'm trying to pass on trivial "tone tells" and other such non scientifically substantiated logic. A detective must stick to the hard facts.In post 215, SirCakez wrote:bwahahaha I can respect thisIn post 210, We are not helping wrote:I dunno man like when you come out in page 2 with a reads list with half of those players haven't even posted, that's not someone you want to sheep.In post 207, Trojan Horses wrote:I respect Mastina, and I agree with her explanations for reads. Which reads of hers doIn post 205, We are not helping wrote:b/c why would u sheep mastina ever? That's asking for town to lose aka scum win con.youdisagree with and additionally think she has bad reasons for?
Have you played with mastina before? This is normal, unfortunately.
No, she is serious.In post 252, Trojan Horses wrote:Yes, that part is likely a joke, given that the alternative explanation is some form of subconscious TMI as scum, which would be highly unlikely given they're exactly the people who didn't post.In post 249, BBmolla wrote:She included people who hadn’t posted on it
Still.
In post 250, Jormengand wrote:*Screams internally*
Okay I'll try to sift through everything and pick up on some dank reads if I can but I'm not honestly confident. I'm not totally used to ten pages of random nonsense before I even open the game TBH.
These two posts in conjunction give me some concerns. After reading the first one, I thought it seemed like an overreaction until I saw their join date and realized they really might not have experienced this before/maybe aren't an alt. The second post, however, reads as scum if coming from a new player uncertain how to approach a red PM. So based on whether this person is actually new or not, I dislike one post or the other.In post 254, Jormengand wrote:It's not a reference. It is guessable what itIn post 253, Trojan Horses wrote:I'm curious about Jormengand's profile picture. Is it a specific reference to something, or something guessable?isbut it's not areferenceto anything specific. Apart from a fun fact about me, I guess.
[line][/line]
Anyway, back on the game: I have no ideas, other than "I have no idea where anyone's getting their reads from so that's weird, huh."
In post 273, Wonderwalll wrote:Who are you talking to here and how do you think they’re shitting on half the playerlist bc I don’t see it?In post 160, RadiantCowbells wrote:'m not putting it even slightly past you to be doing this deliberately to destroy town unity because that is objectively what shitting on half of the players in a game accomplishes
I am mystified as to how both you and jjh are somehow failing to grasp this obvious point.In post 274, Wonderwalll wrote:Oh, it was to jjh then
How do you think he was shitting on half the playerlist?
In post 275, Wonderwalll wrote:VOTE: sircakezIn post 193, SirCakez wrote:possibly fake townslipIn post 187, gobbledygook wrote:I’m legit worried that scum have like stupid high numbers to counteract this very townsided wincondition
In post 277, Wonderwalll wrote:Err yeah probably
You may have to wait until I get on my laptop tho
I don’t think it’s a weird vote
Hate this entrance overall. I'd rather see an explanation than a turn-around.In post 278, Wonderwalll wrote:Why do you think it’s a weird vote?
Why are you approaching this so obliquely? Your posts on this subject seem determined not to directly confront RC; you seem more comfortable taking potshots in reply to others, save for asking for clarity that I don't think is necessary.In post 295, jjh927 wrote:I'm still waiting to see what's up with that whole bunch of RC posts that contextually are simultaneously directed at me and completely not applicable to me whatsoeverIn post 293, Menalque wrote:I think mastina is more likely to be scum than RC is atm but Ali’s advice for how to enjoy large themes was to stop taking them so seriously which means I’m not that interested in trying to sort out RC/mastina/NSG/jjh rn, maybe not today at all
-wall
This made me think of hito's cohesion tell. If I were ever going to break it out, this is the right persona to give it a try, even though in my heart of hearts I'm still not sure I believe him.In post 368, SirCakez wrote:I see. I think we just disagree on this.In post 363, Trojan Horses wrote:Interesting. Thank you.In post 361, SirCakez wrote:A lot more aggressive, a lot less caring about getting into emotional conflict. It's a lot of gut here like I said but I don't feel he plays this game this way as scum.
I'd expect you to just disengage and avoid at that point. Or explain without being conflict-baity like in 336
Na. I want to be able to do my own thing without being forced to play the game a certain way. I want to make it clear that I don't want the option of choosing between "lynch someone" and "don't follow my slot's reads".
This post made me do a double take to see if Baezu had posted more townreads than I thought, but she hadn't. It was only three, and a scumread, and then some more scumreads though that might have been after this post.In post 455, RadiantCowbells wrote:I am town
Sircakez is town
We Are Not Helping disproportionately likely to be town
Baezu I do not think comes flying in townreading a bunch of people, that is gonna look pretty not good as scum, so even though the reads are fairly poorly supported I think that she is town in spite of it
Dis where Im at
I wonder how many times you will have to learn this lesson before it sticks.In post 503, mastina wrote:I mean, I feel like the game is close to solved right now.
A detective would be remiss not to consider all the evidence before offering his Closing Argument. I'm a novice at doing this, but it worked last time... after I barked up a dumb tree for a while...In post 513, northsidegal wrote:I think the lack of such players is what leads to a lot of town losses in LyLo, and I think the players who do this tend to be high-priority kill targets because they're known as being vicious in LyLo (skitter comes to mind).
Allow me to introduce myself. I'm the Ultimate Detective, even though I don't really have the credentials yet...In post 582, Trojan Horses wrote:Does anyone know who Shuichi Saihara is?