Mafiascum.net

Skitter and JV have also been relatively high posters but don't get mentioned at all in this regard.

This feels like scum lowkey discrediting me by boiling my ISO down to "active posting", not taking a hard stance on me but leaving the door open to putting suspicion on me later down the line.

In post 593, JacksonVirgo wrote:Peta did you really choose 100000000000000000000000000 for the lulz or did you want a unique number thinking more people would have grouped numbers?

Honest or I yeet you to oblivion with my N3 vigilante shot (jkjk unless)

both

you seem to be commenting on a lot of trivial things

{Uncrowned}
{Petapan}
{Skitter} {Penguin}
{Something_Smart} {Infinity}

{TGP}
{Pine} {DrippingGoofball}
{JV} {Dunnstrall}

{Lilith}
{Dave}
{Hoopla}

current reads

In post 595, JacksonVirgo wrote:I lowkey have a small inkling that mafia chose 2,3 and 4 respectively. That would make Lilith, Dunnstral and one of the 4's mafia which I'll have to do some looking into but ngl that would make sense to me as I would probably try that.

Maybe 3,4,5 instead but you get my gist. Although mafia choosing informed while doing that is probably counterintuitive so maybe not?

admittedly, however, there are game theory reasons to think at least one of the low number picks is scum (and yes, i am aware that scum have subverted this in past games by all picking high numbers). there are better reasons than numbers to think lilith is scum, though

i do somewhat like the "i would probably try that"

In post 602, Uncrowned wrote:{Uncrowned}
{Petapan}
{Skitter} {Penguin}
{Something_Smart} {Infinity}

{TGP}
{Pine} {DrippingGoofball}
{JV} {Dunnstrall}

{Lilith}
{Dave}
{Hoopla}

current reads

If you're going to do it, at least make it of the rainbow variety

In post 601, petapan wrote:

In post 593, JacksonVirgo wrote:Peta did you really choose 100000000000000000000000000 for the lulz or did you want a unique number thinking more people would have grouped numbers?

Honest or I yeet you to oblivion with my N3 vigilante shot (jkjk unless)

both

you seem to be commenting on a lot of trivial things

You seem to be shading me in trivial ways. I just didn't believe you when you said

In post 64, petapan wrote:i did it because the idea of bidding a million was funny to me

Should I read more into you blatantly lying or what?

I think I am taking that too personally, apologies. I am sure you had reasons to not out that

In post 604, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 602, Uncrowned wrote:{Uncrowned}
{Petapan}
{Skitter} {Penguin}
{Something_Smart} {Infinity}

{TGP}
{Pine} {DrippingGoofball}
{JV} {Dunnstrall}

{Lilith}
{Dave}
{Hoopla}

current reads

If you're going to do it, at least make it of the rainbow variety

{Best Bird}

{skitter, uncrowned}

{jv, s_s, dave}

{goofball, dunnstral, worst bird}

{hoopla, petapan, infinity}

{pine, tgp}

{lillith}

{}

Why is the host in your top read :O

Because ducky is clearly superior

in honor of penguin

In post 605, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 601, petapan wrote:

In post 593, JacksonVirgo wrote:Peta did you really choose 100000000000000000000000000 for the lulz or did you want a unique number thinking more people would have grouped numbers?

Honest or I yeet you to oblivion with my N3 vigilante shot (jkjk unless)

both

you seem to be commenting on a lot of trivial things

You seem to be shading me in trivial ways. I just didn't believe you when you said

In post 64, petapan wrote:i did it because the idea of bidding a million was funny to me

Should I read more into you blatantly lying or what?

i don't think it's a trivial accusation to say a lot of the focus in your catchup was on posts that i found to be fairly uninteresting and seemed to avoid a lot of the more substantial discussions in the thread

where's the lie tho

You said that the idea of bidding was funny to you, which is lying by omission considering what you were asked. And considering your number I find it quite suspicious that you decided to withhold that information.

As I said, I post on what I feel I need to post on. There's nothing else to it

Get fucked Hoopa I now have the cake!

In post 594, JacksonVirgo wrote:Is there a world where all the PRs are active btw? Because why the hell would mafia choose informed in that case rather than multitasking. Is it possible that mafia tried grouping or something to benefit from the new mechanics here.

I'm gonna take some time to do some iioa here because we're not just dealing with pyp. Give me a sec

Seriously? Informed lets mafia fakeclaim whatever didn't get chosen

In post 576, Hoopla wrote:

dunnstral

- played a game as scum against him recently, and he was a dominant voice on D1 that seemed quite obviously town. granted, i had confirmed info that game which can sometimes trick you into thinking someone is more town than they actually are, but i haven't seen similar town energy from him yet.

I seem to recall somebody replacing out of that game because they found me annoying

In post 610, JacksonVirgo wrote:You said that the idea of bidding was funny to you, which is lying by omission considering what you were asked. And considering your number I find it quite suspicious that you decided to withhold that information.

nah

In post 613, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 594, JacksonVirgo wrote:Is there a world where all the PRs are active btw? Because why the hell would mafia choose informed in that case rather than multitasking. Is it possible that mafia tried grouping or something to benefit from the new mechanics here.

I'm gonna take some time to do some iioa here because we're not just dealing with pyp. Give me a sec

Seriously? Informed lets mafia fakeclaim whatever didn't get chosen

What benefit does mafia fake-claiming a role that isn't here do? It doesn't make them any closer to townie by the claim and can just about make their life even harder. The point of informed is so that Mafia knows what the town doesn't have, because I seriously don't get the supreme powar that informed would have over literally cannot be called out because a mafia has to kill and FV didn't act or whatnot.

Feel free to let me know why fake-claiming here when they're not that role helps, it's midnight I could just be dumb.

pedit: That's a shit defence peta, try harder

In post 614, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 576, Hoopla wrote:

dunnstral

- played a game as scum against him recently, and he was a dominant voice on D1 that seemed quite obviously town. granted, i had confirmed info that game which can sometimes trick you into thinking someone is more town than they actually are, but i haven't seen similar town energy from him yet.

I seem to recall somebody replacing out of that game because they found me annoying

Oof

In post 616, JacksonVirgo wrote:pedit: That's a shit defence peta, try harder

nah

In post 616, JacksonVirgo wrote:What benefit does mafia fake-claiming a role that isn't here do?

Avoid their own elim

In post 619, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 616, JacksonVirgo wrote:What benefit does mafia fake-claiming a role that isn't here do?

Avoid their own elim

And get called out by the rolecop? Or tracker or roleblocker/JKer in some situations. It's not worth it unless they were specifically aiming to not get PRs by all choosing 4's or some shit.

Peta is now falling into SL territory for me

agree that fakeclaims don't matter that much in this setup

Am I falling into confbias? peta just look like just outright scum to me
VOTE: petapan

nah