Mafiascum.net

In post 598, Guillotina wrote:

In post 593, Noraa wrote:You said I was scum with horsewoman and then you also said I was scum with Marky.
Apparently in guillo's world Noraa is just confscum cuz OMGUS.

So? In my private notes i got Horsewoman as Null now. I thought she was scum but she's been towning up. Not by a lot but she is, unlike you.

Do you expect my reads to be set on stone? Only wolves expect that you know?

In post 538, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 510, Vaxkiller wrote:@guil How do you know Jackson and nora have only played two games together? I cant find that quote.

Where did they say this?

In post 503, Guillotina wrote:

In post 500, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 499, Guillotina wrote:

In post 489, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 486, Guillotina wrote:

In post 476, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 442, Guillotina wrote:Noraa seems to know a great deal about you despite you've only played two games here. Are you sure you two are not wolf partners?

Can you back this up with quotes.

No, follow the conversation. The game is only 19 pages long. Or ISO me.

I'm not going to allow you to just shade someone for something you can't even be bothered to prove. Own your words

I dont like that word, i never intent to shade when im town. I scum hunt

Shading is not AI on its own, also I don't really care if you like the word or if you intend it or not it's still shade.

Eeeeh shading comes from either scum or toxic town people. It was not a shade, it was part of the progression in the conversation. If you just picked up that post without the rest of the context it would look like shading, just like Noraa who posted a whole wall of Marky quotes without context and called him out on doung shading, i think you also called out Noraa on that no? (Real question)

In post 591, Noraa wrote:

In post 579, DrippingGoofball wrote:Noraa is caught scum lashing out, calling it now.

you've thought I was scum every game now.
maybe reassess ur reads.
u thought I was scum in trials and Cakes large normal.

You were my scum buddy in Death Curse. Tell me. what did my play look like there. and don't be snarky with ur answer. Fairies and bubbles and toadstools don't cut it.

In post 599, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 521, Guillotina wrote:

In post 511, Vaxkiller wrote:I'm caught up, I skimmed alot tho. Will iso as needed.

If you skimmed a lot.

How did you come up with a full read list?

I dont have a reads list.

?

In post 596, Noraa wrote:

In post 590, Guillotina wrote:

In post 585, Noraa wrote:

In post 562, Guillotina wrote:Is your vote placed on me because you scum read me or you want me policy yeeted?

both.

I can get behind wanting to yeet someone that looks obnoxious!

Why do you scum read me though? Because your vote felt personal, you dont like my personality so let's kill this guy right? But you are yet to case me as a wolf.

Don't worry. I already basically know why you are scum. Your ISO will betray u. Just wait.

In post 608, Toogeloo wrote:Game looks to finally have blown up a bit, though so we need so many pages about the definition of "shade" and continued application of the "first game" tell? Look at all these vanity wagons too.

In post 232, Toogeloo wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Horsewoman

In post 276, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 261, Horsewoman wrote:Pretty late for a naked vote here!

I was serious voting you before I jokingly voted Flea because of Noraa's "tell." But sure, leave that out.

In post 326, Toogeloo wrote:I'm on a lot of people's scum lists. Flea, you may need to bus me.

In post 327, Toogeloo wrote:Oh, did I say that in the wrong chat...?

Damnit.

In post 329, Toogeloo wrote:I can't not say I won't read him not aligned with anti-town.

He's fluffy.

In post 349, Toogeloo wrote:Why does everyone think my 232 is a naked vote when I was the FIRST vote on Horsewoman WITH A REASON?

In post 408, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 403, Noraa wrote:I do not TR horse any more cuz this many SRs on her is making me nervous of my ability to find scum but I will argue that the case on her isnt as good as maybe everyone thinks.

Lol...

"I'm sorry, I can't town read you any more. It's not you, it's everyone else. For what it's worth, I don't think their case is all that good."

In post 608, Toogeloo wrote:Game looks to finally have blown up a bit, though so we need so many pages about the definition of "shade" and continued application of the "first game" tell? Look at all these vanity wagons too.

In post 610, Toogeloo wrote:Horsewoman isn't going anywhere, that wagon stalled out back on page 10 probably.

Unvote;
Vote: Guillotina

Have a naked reasoned vore in support of this wagon

In post 600, Noraa wrote:

In post 598, Guillotina wrote:

In post 593, Noraa wrote:You said I was scum with horsewoman and then you also said I was scum with Marky.
Apparently in guillo's world Noraa is just confscum cuz OMGUS.

So? In my private notes i got Horsewoman as Null now. I thought she was scum but she's been towning up. Not by a lot but she is, unlike you.

Do you expect my reads to be set on stone? Only wolves expect that you know?

I'll give you 1 star for the shade. the quality of the shade was kinda shitty so 1 star was all u got.

In post 618, Toogeloo wrote:Progression... Hmm...

Horsewoman leads votes.
Wagon stalls out a dozen pages back.
Thinks a new Wagon would be good for town.
Votes where a new Wagon is gaining traction and currently puts said wagon in the lead.