Mafiascum.net

In post 600, flow trap wrote:Ok, my TRs at this time are Prism & Floo

In post 601, Spartan117 wrote:

In post 600, flow trap wrote:Ok, my TRs at this time are Prism & Floo

Could you explain your scumreads and why they are your scrum reads?

In post 498, Prism wrote:Actually I'll try directly quoting

In post 211, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:

In post 209, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 150, Enchant wrote:

In post 139, floo wrote:

In post 136, Spartan117 wrote: Found this sus to even insinuate it is somewhat serious a vote this early on with such little discussion, unless ofc this is to obtain a reaction and read responses.

Right, as I explained I said it was "partially serious" to avoid seeming scummy / too random.

I probably ask something nonsense, but really want.

Why you think placing votes suspicious? Do you really care how suspicious are you?

Of course explaining votes is good, but doing that and claiming you did that just to don't seem suspicious for that is really something strange.

Town supposed to push suspicious people, you know.

I second that. Not your vote but your explanation is suspicious : "

to avoid seeming scummy"

I third that.

I am saying I directly disagree with this, particularly Salsabil's reasoning here. I think this is a natural thought for relative beginners. I am wondering why someone who has been around the block more often agrees with this.

At this level I don't see any scum openly admit to being insecure about their appearance with 0 prompting, because scum

fear being perceived as selfconcious

In post 499, Prism wrote:I feel like you're missing the point of my questioning on safebet, I'm asking about 191's stance on safebet and how that has changed over time. You seem to be saying you were null at the time of 191, is that accurate?

In post 605, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:

In post 499, Prism wrote:I feel like you're missing the point of my questioning on safebet, I'm asking about 191's stance on safebet and how that has changed over time. You seem to be saying you were null at the time of 191, is that accurate?

That is accurate. I was null at the time of 191.

In post 502, Prism wrote:Again it puzzles me as to why you're diffusing questions and answering for him. I'm well aware of other motives. It is my job, and yours, to trace his thought process and figure out how legitimate those are. 499 is asking to elaborate on why he voted if my reading-that he didn't actually suspect safebet-is correct.

All you have to do is wait and see if his answers line up to you. You're shooting us both in the foot right now, arguably all 3 of us.

In post 609, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I have actually failed to finish reading the thread. Will someone explain their case against me?

In post 610, Enchant wrote:

In post 609, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I have actually failed to finish reading the thread. Will someone explain their case against me?

They think you are my mafia partner.

In post 611, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:

In post 610, Enchant wrote:

In post 609, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I have actually failed to finish reading the thread. Will someone explain their case against me?

They think you are my mafia partner.

Why do they think so? (Someone other than Enchant may answer)

In post 609, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I have actually failed to finish reading the thread. Will someone explain their case against me?

In post 616, flow trap wrote:About that, I don't find 365 as defending Enchant, but rather making a generalization of tactics

In post 617, flow trap wrote:Salsa, what do you currently think of Spartan?

In post 620, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Still reading post 444.

good luck with that

In post 619, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 617, flow trap wrote:Salsa, what do you currently think of Spartan?

null/

town

In post 615, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 609, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I have actually failed to finish reading the thread. Will someone explain their case against me?

Spoiler: My Case

In post 531, Salsabil Faria wrote:

Okay, so I just go through

Fredrick A Campbell

's iso, these are the things I found:
Post= 166, 169 and 173 are good, feels like a town post
Post= 212 seems opportunistic vote on

Floo

, not getting town vibe
Post= 365 by keeping

esotericzoomer

's post 444, it actually makes sense, like you tried to protect/defend your scum partner (in this case

Enchant

) there
Post= 494 here I asked your reads which is a serious question and game-related question which you avoided. But you interacted with me in those posts which were not game-related, from which I feel you're somewhat lurking at this point or want to be the second mysterious player here, not a town thing for me.

VOTE: Fredrick A Campbell