Mafiascum.net

In post 534, Iconeum wrote:AliceK provided 3 naked townreads, followed by 3 naked scumreads followed by a vote on IV

I think this is literally scum who's going by some sort of checklist:

-get townreads
-get scumreads
-make a vote
-??
-profit

or something like that

Reads are mostly not naked I stated my reasons behind most of them. You are trying to say that only scums are doing that which is not true. I think getting as many trs and srs is important. Voting someone even with lack of arguments is also beneficial as a pressured scum is more likely to make a mistake.

neither of your 3 townreads were explained
neither of your 3 scumreads were explained

IIRC

that's pretty much the definition of naked

and 3 is also that juicy juicy number that *feels* right you know

In post 601, Iconeum wrote:neither of your 3 townreads were explained
neither of your 3 scumreads were explained

IIRC

that's pretty much the definition of naked

I explained my reads on geraintm, you and iv. I won't write an essay if you ask for that.

In post 603, AliceK wrote:I explained my reads on geraintm, you and iv. I won't write an essay if you ask for that.

okay

can you quote me the bits that you consider explanation?

In post 504, Datisi wrote:that's not really "more elaborate". could you provide some reasoning to go with that? also, thoughts on gypyx/baltar still the same, or?

@alice

and the order of the votes on alice also seems wrong?

Ftr I still suspect Alice but want to explore other options given we still have a lot of time remaining

VOTE: Georgebailey
I accidentally made this vote outside of this game, but i meant it be4 Luca.

In post 610, Luca Blight wrote:Ftr I still suspect Alice but want to explore other options given we still have a lot of time remaining

well that just sounds like deviating the wagon with extra steps

I’m not happy to end the day when some players have barely said anything...

fair, but that doesn't really require you to unvote or anything

Norwee has your opinion on IV changed

In post 615, Gypyx wrote:fair, but that doesn't really require you to unvote or anything

I know, but I feel it’s better to mix things up a bit while there’s still time in the day regardless

In post 606, Datisi wrote:

In post 504, Datisi wrote:that's not really "more elaborate". could you provide some reasoning to go with that? also, thoughts on gypyx/baltar still the same, or?

@alice

I should find some time after the work. A lot of interesting stuff happened I can comment on.

In post 565, Datisi wrote:

In post 561, Iconeum wrote:

In post 552, Datisi wrote:"technically" my strongest scumread is alice (w hwavy quotation marks bc not much confidence yet in like 3/4ths of the game)

why are you scared of alice being 'technically' Y-1

because

i am far from certain she is scum

and the real possibility of someone else voting then those two hammering and then us losing a townie (who might even be a pr) in a day where still ~half the game is different flavours of null to me

and that can easily be avoided by Not having her on y-1

y is her bein y-1 a bad thing if ur having trouble readin her tho

In post 572, geraintm wrote:this is a lazy ass ask for a claim

this is rly cute

In post 572, geraintm wrote: I 95% hate Wooper's posts.

dude same omg

In post 621, Wooper wrote:y is her bein y-1 a bad thing if ur having trouble readin her tho

bc them being at y-1 isn't necessarily gonna make them magically more readable to me and i'm just gonna sweat about the possibility of a premature hammer the whole time

In post 622, Wooper wrote:

In post 572, geraintm wrote:this is a lazy ass ask for a claim

this is rly cute

In post 572, geraintm wrote: I 95% hate Wooper's posts.

dude same omg

same as in you hate my posts of that numpty Wooper?