Mafiascum.net

In post 596, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 462, jjh927 wrote:Like, please do not at any point question decisions that the stumps may or may not have made with regards to power roles, as getting them to defend those choices is akin to rolefishing

This is a valid statement

In post 497, Free Money Free Tea wrote:VOTE: mastina
This is obvious scum. Serious vote.

In post 600, House wrote:

In post 596, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 462, jjh927 wrote:Like, please do not at any point question decisions that the stumps may or may not have made with regards to power roles, as getting them to defend those choices is akin to rolefishing

This is a valid statement

Considering it was about a role that was already outed, I kinda disagree on that.

Posts that I consider "proper play scolding" lean scum to me because it's an easy way to appear town without actually contributing to the game. That said, he changed my mind later on by actively contributing to the game.

In post 506, jjh927 wrote:No, that's a town mastina readslist

In post 530, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:

In post 525, jjh927 wrote:VOTE: Mia and Maya Fey

hook line and sinker

In post 548, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:

In post 547, mastina wrote:

In post 502, Moongrass wrote:Are readlists usually produced this early for you mastina?

Yes, and I'm dead serious about this:

VOTE: Mia and Maya Fey

It's still possible that they are town for one simple reason. (A reason I'm not sharing right now.) But I actually legit think they're scum.

Sheep the opposite of what mastina reads us as btw ^^^^

In post 575, mastina wrote:

In post 543, northsidegal wrote:i trust jjh on mastina more than i do anyone else in the game.

Just for the sake of full disclosure here; jjh is probably the best player here at reading me (Titus second best tho Titus has the tendency of OMGUSing me when I am suspicious of her which can dampen the accuracy there), buuuuuuuuuuuut, scumastina can and has pocketed jjh before. jjh and I usually have the dynamic of more or less assuming the other is town until given damn good reason to think otherwise, but even when giving sincere reads that aren't free passes, are naturally inclined to townread each other.

However, given that you are statistically more likely to be town than scum, statistically speaking, this "assume town until given damn good reason to otherwise, and if forced to give an actual non-assumed read, townreading them anyway" approach is disproportionately accurate since by the numbers we end up both town more often than not.

In post 545, Mia and Maya Fey wrote:I'll just drop that scum think I'm an easy push in games because I am very aggressive and have an unorthodox playstyle.

It's very much not! I was looking forward to seeing the aggression from the playstyle.

The manifestation of how you are using the aggression is what leads me to believe you drew a red PM here.

So it's not the playstyle; it's what you are doing with said playstyle.

In post 610, jjh927 wrote:I am the opposite

Gamma looks very much town

In post 611, House wrote:

In post 610, jjh927 wrote:I am the opposite

Gamma looks very much town

Yeah. A lot of people equivocate activity with town and he flew in and popped out a lot of posts at one time... without actually giving us anything to chew on.

There's no meat on all those bones.

In post 613, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like 75% of my ability to read people comes from interacting with them
So like, if you’re concerned I haven’t expressed much of value, why not start a conversation?

In post 595, Gamma Emerald wrote:What’s crack-a-lackin’, homies?

In post 452, Moongrass wrote:Your entrance posts seem a little more proactive than what I thought would be normal for you NK15. That yawn in particular seemed like posting for the sake of posting. Am I wrong?

In post 453, Moongrass wrote:I think proactive is the wrong word, replace with simply active.

Time will probably tell on this, but I think NK15 is kinda an easy read as mafia, iirc he has an odd tendency to implode or do something super-scummy around end of Day 1

In post 599, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 481, Moongrass wrote:

In post 474, jjh927 wrote:

In post 473, Moongrass wrote:I like VOTE: NK15 better.

What's up with disparaging you for doing something with what little content there is though?

How do you know I'm doing something as town?

Moongrass probtown

In post 601, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 497, Free Money Free Tea wrote:VOTE: mastina
This is obvious scum. Serious vote.

Why, because this feels premature and misguided rn