Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2021 7:37 am
lol
absolutelyIn post 598, Lukewarm wrote:In post 596, sang froid wrote:these playersIn post 581, Datisi wrote:The Bulge, StrangeMatter, Cabd, Lukewarm
need to make a voteVOTE: sang froidIn post 597, sang froid wrote:ideally in their next post
Am I doing this right?
I mean I can't really refute "vibes". And I think my justifications were pretty reasonable, Roden went to great extents to present the most extreme possible version of every argument against me. Hopefully I give you better vibes tomorrow.In post 590, sang froid wrote:vibes, my dudeIn post 587, Bimblesticks wrote:I admire the confidence but could you uhhh... explain why you want to vote me?
you were the person whose posting most made me feel like I was just reading blah blah justifications instead of someone really engaged with the thread
My vote for Illwei is based off the fact he voted for me a while ago, and it took me multiple posts on the topic before he actually explained why, and his only explanation was that StrangeMatter didn't after they asked me to talk more, and he didn't understand that, which is a really minor justification for voting somebody. He's also been reacting to everything with a kind of apathy and not really engaging with the thread, the best example of which is Post 491.In post 595, Lukewarm wrote:Hello -- I'm new here -- I have not read anything from your slot yetIn post 587, Bimblesticks wrote:I admire the confidence but could you uhhh... explain why you want to vote me?
I see from the VC, you are voting Illwei - can you explain your reasoning there?
Also, if Illwei was off the table, who would you be looking at as of now?
Are these things you think scum are more likely to do then town?In post 602, Bimblesticks wrote:My vote for Illwei is based off the fact he voted for me a while ago, and it took me multiple posts on the topic before he actually explained why, and his only explanation was that StrangeMatter didn't after they asked me to talk more, and he didn't understand that, which is a really minor justification for voting somebody. He's also been reacting to everything with a kind of apathy and not really engaging with the thread, the best example of which is Post 491.
Please tell me this is a jokeIn post 559, The Bulge wrote:this is unironically extremely compelling hahahahaIn post 512, Lukewarm wrote:In your first game, you were town - you made 62 posts, and you said "tbh" zero times
In this game, have have made 42 posts, and have said "tbh" 25 times
Comparing your current game (where you alignment is unknown) to your other games, where we know your alignment is a pretty effective way to sort people you are unsure on.In post 605, Illwei wrote:Please tell me this is a jokeIn post 559, The Bulge wrote:this is unironically extremely compelling hahahahaIn post 512, Lukewarm wrote:In your first game, you were town - you made 62 posts, and you said "tbh" zero times
In this game, have have made 42 posts, and have said "tbh" 25 times
Well, yes... but, with "tbh" ? : PIn post 606, Lukewarm wrote:Comparing your current game (where you alignment is unknown) to your other games, where we know your alignment is a pretty effective way to sort people you are unsure on.
Nothing specific to this game, but it has both been a bit me not having as much time as I did last time, with one a few hours each day to get on, and also my IRL wim being non-existant : PIn post 607, Lukewarm wrote:@Illwei -- is there any thing about this game that would result in your posts sounding/feeling different then your last?
me gonna have to cc u
dw i cced for uIn post 582, Lukewarm wrote:Huh. Hate the cop claim --- Your slot was both not in danger of being voted out and not in danger of being the NK :/
LOL OMGIn post 616, Lukewarm wrote:I feel like this game was moving along nicely, and then sang and grandpa both decided to swerve into traffic going the wrong way :/
In post 617, Lukewarm wrote:I have thoughts - but want to see what Sang has to say about the CC before I drop them
In post 619, Cabd wrote:Going to reiterate what Luke just said we really need a response before we can start dropping resolutions.
but...In post 623, Cabd wrote:Even if you're both kidding you have done serious harm to the nature of a semi-open setup and you're causing movements in the waters that you normally hide folks to stir up and become potentially exposed. Sit down and time out and think about what you've done. No kibble or soup for you.