Mafiascum.net

In post 588, Wisdom wrote:

SirCakez wrote:tempted to sheep Wisdom so he doesn't kill me

You should

In post 599, SleepyKrew wrote:

In post 597, Thestatusquo wrote:

In post 592, SleepyKrew wrote:wow lucky me

I'm screaming every time someone just declares a read with no explanation. No one fucking cares. Blessings and praise to those of you that are giving reasons

how about you give some reads instead of just complaining about the others doing so?

I don't have any strong reads and tbh care more about getting to Night than trying our luck voting out scum today. The closest thing to a scumread I have is STD because I vibed with your posts and anti-vibed with his but that's not strong so I'm fine just voting for utility

In post 585, SleepyKrew wrote:

In post 583, T3 wrote:

In post 315, mastina wrote:Yo, will be back here to read and give reads later but for now just wanted to claim this;

I am a 1x reflexive role-copier

; I will get a one-shot copy of the first power to target me. So,

if you think your power is pretty damn strong especially if a second player can use it, you should target me N1

.

hmmmmmm

THIS DID NOT NEED TO BE A POST

In post 590, Thestatusquo wrote:

In post 572, T3 wrote:

In post 262, Thestatusquo wrote:

In post 253, Save The Dragons wrote:ok i don't get it

you yourself admit the wagon is dumb

me calling it out as such is just me being honest about an objectively dumb wagon

pedit

i wanted to call out this wagon as specifically dumb because it's what i saw, there's no special motive or anything. just because wagons that are dumb happen doesn't mean i'm not allowed to call it out as such

pedit

holy shit what am i lying about

How is the wagon on firebringer more objectively dumb than a couple people saying they were going to policy sirCakez?

And I don't believe that you don't have a purpose when you make posts generally speaking.

It's not that you aren't allowed to call things out as dumb, it speaks to me to your mindset when you're reading the thread. It's like, a very surface level thing to call out, because you know its SUPPOSED to be dumb. So it looks to me like you're trying to sort of insert yourself into a pseudo serious discussion while actually saying literally nothing of consequence. It looks like you're talking about the game but you're actually not. I don't see a lot of town players feel the need to comment on how things in RVS are dumb, because they're too busy doing dumb things in RVS and they know it doesn't matter.

It's like simultaneously hyper aware of gamestate but not aware of the normal flow of a mafia game at the same time.

so yeah, that draws a vote.

TSQ UTR DREAM

have literally no clue what this means.

I also kind of agree with wisdom that nancy will become incredibly easy to town bin at some point so not super interested in looking there today maybe? But I don't know how the dynamics of a hydra change that fact.

In post 604, Milobird wrote:I feel like this wagon is looking at the surface level and not really digging deeper.

In post 601, SirCakez wrote:

In post 588, Wisdom wrote:

SirCakez wrote:tempted to sheep Wisdom so he doesn't kill me

You should

well we're agreeing on Brain Cell so Imma stick with that for now
not sold on TIL

In post 607, Thestatusquo wrote:Wait Nancy are you claiming you do not jump on people for making reads in you and why? That was not my experience in the entirety of team mafia.

In post 610, SirCakez wrote:ok then do it

In post 612, Thestatusquo wrote:Ah, auro is reaction testing is what you're saying.

In post 616, Thestatusquo wrote:I'm pretty skeptical of "ok we're going to solve the game" claims tbh.

I find they're frequently made by mafia who are attempting to inflate their own importance.

Again see FL in team mafia.

In post 619, SirCakez wrote:auro will probably try to elim me this game

In post 618, Save The Dragons wrote:does it sound like i'm going away