Mafiascum.net

But why

I honestly have like no reads I feel like I am familiar with 0 ppl of this fuckin playerlist

If this player list doesn't have anyone you're familiar with, which games do? I've played with you like 3 or 4 times.

-Bell

Yah but like your one of the people i have a townread on

In post 470, Child of Fairies wrote:VOTE: Off the Hook

Let's start here. Most of the iso is fluff from either player, with the only real action being backing an early vote on Galiron without voting it and then voting Wheme with zero explanation whatsoever. Post-wheme they make giant looking posts with pretty much no original content, just mainly quoting things and going agree/disagree. They only ever engage with Wheme once, and it wasn't even related to the wagon on them, and yet while still voting wheme they say they like a post that calls out the wheme wagon and the people on it for being lazy? The skybird vote is similarly completely out of nowhere.

To me it feels like they're trying to appear active and contributing without saying much of anything, and I don't like that.

thats exactly what im doing.

In post 470, Child of Fairies wrote:The skybird vote is similarly completely out of nowhere.

yes it was, but i dont remember seeing anybody ask abt it so i didnt talk abt it :shrug:
so, is there anything u wanna ask abt..? alot of these things seem like my characteristics

In post 496, DeasVail wrote:VOTE: Cephrir

This was going to be a naked vote, but now it isn't.

oo im actually curious, do u have any reasons

In post 526, Pavowski wrote:I was going to say I don't really understand the Skybird wagon, but I checked the iso and it's, like, empty. So I'm gonna roll with the crowd here.

what have u done that wasnt what a whole crowd of people wanted, pav? : D

In post 541, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 468, GuiltyLion wrote:I need to look through that game Luke sent me,

I think I did notice in skimming it that COF missed somebody's claim

so TBD on if it changes my mind at all when I have time to do a proper deep dive, which is not now unfortunately

@GuiltyLion, Child of Fairies was not in this game, meaning you could not have seen anything from them on a skim -- care to weigh in?

Cause I am having a hard time looking at this, and not thinking "this is a bold faced lie"

VOTE: guiltylion

i agree with other people, its a bit of a grasp to go after him for these reasons.

In post 544, Lukewarm wrote:Marci's increasingly non-presence - she seems to be at less then 1 post a day for the last 4 days, combined with my earlier issues with her play so far this game.

hihi, can u help me with that...? im sooo lost and idk whats happening and its hard to make reads
lets chat! is there anyone u think i should look at deeper in particular..?

In post 551, Pavowski wrote:Luke has been a little over-fixated on the slot but there's Luke/Marci history so that probably cancels out. I don't think scum!Luke dives in so hard on an elim there and I don't have nearly as many strong feelings about OtH. If I had to choose a side I'd choose Luke's.

Is it enough to vote? I dunno I'm not properly awake yet

yeah im not so surprised luke focused on me and gamma, tho i think he isn't listening a tiny bit
i dont mind that people prefer lukes side, i don't see exactly why, but i dont mind anyways. if u wanna vote me, go ahead and do it.

... i would unvote luke here, but i dont really have a better vote so ill keep it so gamma can continue whtever he was doing.
im not too convinced luke will be scum

~M★

In post 604, Off The Hook wrote:what have u done that wasnt what a whole crowd of people wanted, pav? : D

I feel a little called out miss Star, if thou hast words pray speak them plain

And re: you and Luke, I'm not compelled to vote you. I'm slightly towny on Luke but nullish on you and GE.

In post 579, Skybird wrote:Lukewarm - His posting has be weird. I don't believe I've played with him before so I don't know if this is just his playing style or something that could be indicating alignment. Another one I need to look at more.

What do you think of the Luke-DV-GuiltyLion triangle?

In post 495, Wisdom wrote:

In post 477, Child of Fairies wrote:Just gonna claim now. I'm poisoned, I die at the end of night 3.

Flavor?

Child of Fairies do tell us whats the flavor justification for you being poisoned

In post 605, Pavowski wrote:

In post 604, Off The Hook wrote:what have u done that wasnt what a whole crowd of people wanted, pav? : D

I feel a little called out miss Star, if thou hast words pray speak them plain

was i not clear..? im confused

In post 76, Pavowski wrote:This crazy sob wrote a damn sonnet to cast a vote, I have to sheep it

VOTE: Ceph

In post 189, Pavowski wrote:Respect anyway, and I agree with your vote

VOTE: whemestar

In post 440, Pavowski wrote:Wheme wagon is stale. CoF wagon is hot. Nothing particularly towny in their ISO.

VOTE: CoF or wow me with some dank reads.

In post 526, Pavowski wrote:I was going to say I don't really understand the Skybird wagon, but I checked the iso and it's, like, empty. So I'm gonna roll with the crowd here.

VOTE: Skybird

am i wrong to say ur following the crowd..? come explain to me, because from what i remember the most from u, its u following whats "hot". i wanted to know, what have u done outside of following others..?
do i make better sense yet-
the original intent of the statement before was "come prove me wrong"

~M★

oh gamma thinks im pushing u
that isnt my intention

my brains lagging rn so im just asking things so i can understand better

Mmmm maybe I was preemptive in calling OTH a townread

I need to sleep on it but 604 gives me bad vibes

In post 604, Off The Hook wrote:oo im actually curious, do u have any reasons

I think that regardless of alignment, Cephrir is not feeling very engaged with the game. If he was feeling more into it, I have no doubt that he would be more whether town or scum, so it's not an "activity" or "engagement" read, exactly. It's not the easiest to explain, but Cephrir's play just aligns with what I would expect from disengaged scum trying to look like they're doing stuff, rather than disengaged town who are trying to make sense of the game. Ceph's posts are responses to specific things, picking up on specific points that people are making and commenting on them, but I just don't get from his posts the sense of a depth of thought behind all that. All of his posts are things that informed scum could easily say, easily fake. There's no specific post from Ceph, or specific thing, just an impression from his overall play.

I , though, interested in hearing more about Ceph's LLD vote.

In post 611, DeasVail wrote:

In post 604, Off The Hook wrote:oo im actually curious, do u have any reasons

I think that regardless of alignment, Cephrir is not feeling very engaged with the game. If he was feeling more into it, I have no doubt that he would be more

present

whether town or scum, so it's not an "activity" or "engagement" read, exactly. It's not the easiest to explain, but Cephrir's play just aligns with what I would expect from disengaged scum trying to look like they're doing stuff, rather than disengaged town who are trying to make sense of the game. Ceph's posts are responses to specific things, picking up on specific points that people are making and commenting on them, but I just don't get from his posts the sense of a depth of thought behind all that. All of his posts are things that informed scum could easily say, easily fake. There's no specific post from Ceph, or specific thing, just an impression from his overall play.

I

am

, though, interested in hearing more about Ceph's LLD vote.

I've gotten this impression from *a few* slots in this lobby.

In post 608, Off The Hook wrote:am i wrong to say ur following the crowd..? come explain to me, because from what i remember the most from u, its u following whats "hot". i wanted to know, what have u done outside of following others..?
do i make better sense yet-
the original intent of the statement before was "come prove me wrong"

Okay, so I don't put a lot of stock in d1 reads, mine or anybody else's, especially in the heat of d1. I like to pressure slots and see what happens, and that means following crowds.

But like, I'm offering impressions that have nothing to do with crowd-following?

EVIDENCE OF ME NOT JUST MEMEING/FOLLOWING THE CROWD:


I mean ok, there's still a bit of memeing in there, but

It's like you ISO'd me for exactly those things you were looking for and ignored all this

In post 609, Off The Hook wrote:oh gamma thinks im pushing u
that isnt my intention

my brains lagging rn so im just asking things so i can understand better

I think you would be the first one to push me in this thread, which in itself is interesting

I dont have a very interesting reason for my vote, I just dont have anywhere I feel really good about putting it and I was hoping to get her to do more

In post 606, Galron wrote:

In post 579, Skybird wrote:Lukewarm - His posting has be weird. I don't believe I've played with him before so I don't know if this is just his playing style or something that could be indicating alignment. Another one I need to look at more.

What do you think of the Luke-DV-GuiltyLion triangle?

It's weird. I've been trying to parce DV and I keep thinking he's very wordy. It makes it hard to figure out his alignment. Nothing jumps out and screams scum to me.

My GL read is leaning town. My Luke read is more null. I didn't like him jumping on GL when Luke linked him to the wrong game. GL's response feels genuine. I think GL vs. Luke is TvT. Not sure why you have DV in there.

In post 578, GuiltyLion wrote:her Bowser Jr scumread feels stale, I feel I've seen at least mixed signals from Bowser Jr that I'd expect other townies to be picking up on

Well I try to talk with him but he just ignores me, makes me quite blue.

Perhaps I should write him a poem instead?

JC, thoughts on the wagon on you?

In post 615, Cephrir wrote:I dont have a very interesting reason for my vote, I just dont have anywhere I feel really good about putting it and I was hoping to get her to do more

This "head" of LLD for lack of a better word is not going to do that. We need to accept them as they are. This means looking at the timing of their votes.

In post 618, Tamora's Angel wrote:JC, thoughts on the wagon on you?

It is certainly tragic.

, wanna be thread masons?

-GE

Now fair befall you.

Cheerily, bold man

O, well said!