Page 241 of 342
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:04 pm
by Yulia Jue
Votecount 3-7 (Unchanged from 3-6)
With 12 players alive, it will take 7 votes to lynch or no lynch.
Magenta_thegreat (1): PeregrineV
AngryPidgeon (2): CupcakePanda, magenta_thegreat
CupcakePanda (4): AngryPidgeon, Just Sheep Us, Nachomamma8, The Fox and the Hound
Not Voting (5): Penguin_Alien, Red Gyarados, CarbonFiber, Breakfast With Stalin, Titan
Deadline is set at 13 days:
(expired on 2014-05-20 18:13:27)
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:05 pm
by Katsuki
Nacho's obvfuckingscum but y'all just gonna be bad and let him live all game.
Man this feels like a repeat of that last CBAD game.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:05 pm
by Titan
Thank you for town telling Pidgeon!
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:07 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 6001, Katsuki wrote:Nacho's obvfuckingscum but y'all just gonna be bad and let him live all game.
Man this feels like a repeat of that last CBAD game.
Which one?
The one where I was town, or... the one where I was town?
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:07 pm
by Nachomamma8
Or maybe you're thinking of the one where I was town???
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:07 pm
by Titan
Which one was that?
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:08 pm
by Katsuki
You were scum in the last one.
DIE YOU SCUMFUCK
pedit: that ssk/cabd one
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:09 pm
by Nachomamma8
My play here reminds you of my play there?
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:09 pm
by Nachomamma8
Please continue.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:32 pm
by Breakfast With Sandy
In post 6006, Katsuki wrote:You were scum in the last one.
DIE YOU SCUMFUCK
pedit: that ssk/cabd one
Who is he manipulating in this game?
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:39 pm
by AngryPidgeon
I just asked Cabd if a Tracker would be able to see an action if that action were successfully Delayed on the same night. The answer was no.
Katsuki is confirmed to have not Delayed me
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:58 pm
by Katsuki
All of you evidently (minus his buddies).
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:59 pm
by CarbonFiber
In post 6010, AngryPidgeon wrote:I just asked Cabd if a Tracker would be able to see an action if that action were successfully Delayed on the same night. The answer was no.
Katsuki is confirmed to have not Delayed me
Okay. Let's work out all the other possible ways that his action could have failed.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:59 pm
by Katsuki
In post 6010, AngryPidgeon wrote:I just asked Cabd if a Tracker would be able to see an action if that action were successfully Delayed on the same night. The answer was no.
Katsuki is confirmed to have not Delayed me
AND YOU DIE AFTER MY FLIP
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 1:00 pm
by CarbonFiber
Katsuki, full claim everything about your role: who it works on, who it doesn't, what its restrictions are, and whether you are male/female, or child/adult.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 1:02 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 6012, CarbonFiber wrote: In post 6010, AngryPidgeon wrote:I just asked Cabd if a Tracker would be able to see an action if that action were successfully Delayed on the same night. The answer was no.
Katsuki is confirmed to have not Delayed me
Okay. Let's work out all the other possible ways that his action could have failed.
We've found the one way his action could have failed.
We've found the one way Katsuki could possibly be town.
They are both extraordinarily unlikely scenarios.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 1:03 pm
by CupcakePanda
ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
female child?
Nag doesn't work on beasts.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 1:04 pm
by Nachomamma8
I don't think getting any more convoluted than we already have is beneficial.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 1:04 pm
by CupcakePanda
In post 6015, Nachomamma8 wrote: In post 6012, CarbonFiber wrote: In post 6010, AngryPidgeon wrote:I just asked Cabd if a Tracker would be able to see an action if that action were successfully Delayed on the same night. The answer was no.
Katsuki is confirmed to have not Delayed me
Okay. Let's work out all the other possible ways that his action could have failed.
We've found the one way his action could have failed.
We've found the one way Katsuki could possibly be town.
They are both extraordinarily unlikely scenarios.
This is the same exact shit I post when I'm busy mislynching people as scum to save scumbuddies.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 1:04 pm
by CupcakePanda
Nacho I swear to fuck imma cut you when I see you up in SF.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 1:05 pm
by CupcakePanda
In post 5699, Katsuki wrote: In post 5680, Titan wrote: In post 5678, CupcakePanda wrote:The thing that pisses me off most about this day is that I can see AP gloating over getting me lynched despite a guilty.
Fuck after what I did to you and bro you guys enjoy it because its not gonna last.
What do you think about bro claiming to have tracked ap to ffery?
Well, that's what tripped me up at first.
However, considering we already have players claiming to be roleblocked, the likelihood of me being roleblocked is essentially 0.
The only possibilities then would like in there being a redirector or busdriver. Why a redirector would target me is LOLOL so lets discount that.
The last possibility would be a busdriver. If there was one who targetted AP+someone last night, they should've claimed already. Given no claim, we will discount that.
What remains is that, my action went through and AP is lying scum. Why despbros would come out with that fake tracker claim as scumbuddies I have no idea.
The last possibility is that, my action did NOT go through, but that would involve AP fakeclaiming ANYWAYS so.
Actually... typing up this post, now that you mention it, that is a possibility. HOWEVER, despbros claimed that their action fails on scum...
SIDETRACK:
WHY THE FUCK WOULD THERE BE A ROLE THAT'S STRONGER THAN COP ANYWAYS?! THINK ABOUT IT, IT ESSENTIALLY GIVES ALIGNMENT RESULT + ROLE CONFIRMATION OF TOWNIES
Actually the entire claim just seems wack.
But it would be a possibility that despbros is town given an AP scumflip. Their claim seems like WHOOOOOOOSH though and I'd be happier assuming their scum anyways.
EITHER WAY
AP IS SCUM AND CAN'T POSSIBLY BE TOWN
As for DESPBROS, I'm probably going to regret giving them a way out after AP flips scum, but well... right now, that's all I can think of, and while I disagree with being forthcoming, meh.
It IS possible that AP actioned N2 AS FAKECLAIMING SCUM (ROLE IS OF UTMOST IMPORTANCE). In that event, he probably roleblocked stalin.
NACHO ON THE OTHER HAND
DESERVES ROPE
In post 5718, Katsuki wrote: In post 5711, Breakfast With Sandy wrote:
Cupcake Panda - don't like the lead-up to the big reveal. don't like the early reactions, though the last few posts are more in solve-it mode.
SORRY IM TOWN TRYING TO WORK OUT WHAT THE FUCK IS UP WITH ALL THESE CLAIMS TODAY
BECAUSE THEY SURE AS FUCK DONT MAKE SENSE ON MY END BARRING AP/DESPBRO SCUM.
In post 5924, Katsuki wrote:@Tammy: Anyone can manipulate a neighbourhood... Hell I manipulated 4 heads into thinking I was towntowntown in Team Mafia: AN...
@Pere: If AP is a fakeclaiming beast, he and stalin are not confirmed.
p-edt: wow ninjas to oblivion posted this ages ago
In post 6001, Katsuki wrote:Nacho's obvfuckingscum but y'all just gonna be bad and let him live all game.
Man this feels like a repeat of that last CBAD game.
In post 6006, Katsuki wrote:You were scum in the last one.
DIE YOU SCUMFUCK
pedit: that ssk/cabd one
In post 6013, Katsuki wrote: In post 6010, AngryPidgeon wrote:I just asked Cabd if a Tracker would be able to see an action if that action were successfully Delayed on the same night. The answer was no.
Katsuki is confirmed to have not Delayed me
AND YOU DIE AFTER MY FLIP
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 1:06 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 6018, CupcakePanda wrote: In post 6015, Nachomamma8 wrote: In post 6012, CarbonFiber wrote: In post 6010, AngryPidgeon wrote:I just asked Cabd if a Tracker would be able to see an action if that action were successfully Delayed on the same night. The answer was no.
Katsuki is confirmed to have not Delayed me
Okay. Let's work out all the other possible ways that his action could have failed.
We've found the one way his action could have failed.
We've found the one way Katsuki could possibly be town.
They are both extraordinarily unlikely scenarios.
This is the same exact shit I post when I'm busy mislynching people as scum to save scumbuddies.
I post this shit as scum too, but there's usually a giant glaring flaw that no one picks up on because no one's paying attention.
I also post things like this as town when the decision is as clear cut as it is.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 1:07 pm
by Nachomamma8
i'm gonna talk so much shit in SF
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 1:08 pm
by AngryPidgeon
In post 6014, CarbonFiber wrote:Katsuki, full claim everything about your role: who it works on, who it doesn't, what its restrictions are, and whether you are male/female, or child/adult.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 1:09 pm
by Nachomamma8
although this situation really isn't your fault, to be fair.
one scum usually gets fucked over by night actions per game: this time, that scum was you