Mafiascum.net

In post 6024, NanceFloor wrote:And you said yourself, no competent scumteam pairs two scum together.

I did not say this.

In post 6024, NanceFloor wrote:You don’t have to have facts, if you have common sense.

Facts stop a bullshit common sense argument. I've won enough games where conftown was scum to prefer my approach as long as I don't try to lynch consensus town without absolute proof.

After this we use protect then arena

Please give me a reason you think Titus's coalition will .

-TL

In post 6025, Titus wrote:

In post 6024, NanceFloor wrote:And you said yourself, no competent scumteam pairs two scum together.

I did not say this.

In post 3228, Titus wrote:

In post 3227, themilkcartonkid wrote:

In post 3225, Titus wrote:That's why NL is optimal.

No, because the game could be as easy as oka bef or ank clem or chem creature, that's why lynching a lhf is better than no lynching

Why would any competent scumteam pair themselves?

I don't think it will succeed.

But I don't think we can get anything else through before deadline

Amazing that if I'm not projecting leadership literally nothing gets done

In post 6027, RadiantCowbells wrote:After this we use protect then arena

Would rather we flip scum right after if coalition fails.

In post 6028, Time Devil wrote:Please give me a reason you think Titus's coalition will

succeed

.

-TL

In post 6010, RadiantCowbells wrote:i'm only supporting titus as an alternative to a nl

Hopefully we get an extension but Titus’ coalition > nl :/

Yeh, I don't see any other coalition happening.

In post 6029, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 6025, Titus wrote:

In post 6024, NanceFloor wrote:And you said yourself, no competent scumteam pairs two scum together.

I did not say this.

In post 3228, Titus wrote:

In post 3227, themilkcartonkid wrote:

In post 3225, Titus wrote:That's why NL is optimal.

No, because the game could be as easy as oka bef or ank clem or chem creature, that's why lynching a lhf is better than no lynching

Why would any competent scumteam pair themselves?

Again...

Arena gives us two flips unless scum scumclaims as the initial target

I'll unvote if we get an extension or if any other coalition gets traction

In post 6030, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't think it will succeed.

But I don't think we can get anything else through before deadline

Amazing that if I'm not projecting leadership literally nothing gets done

Unless we get an extension and we can take a chance in every other wagon mathematically having a better chance of succeeding over Titus’.

In post 6028, Time Devil wrote:Please give me a reason you think Titus's coalition will

succeed

.

-TL

It has no guaranteed scum suspect so if you remove any behavior analysis, it is the most likely to succeed.

There you go, a reason.

In post 6036, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 6030, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't think it will succeed.

But I don't think we can get anything else through before deadline

Amazing that if I'm not projecting leadership literally nothing gets done

Unless we get an extension and we can take a chance in every other wagon mathematically having a better chance of succeeding over Titus’.

I don't think you understand how probability works....

We hit deadline on veto too
I guess I have to force something this game

In post 6035, RadiantCowbells wrote:Arena gives us two flips unless scum scumclaims as the initial target

I'll unvote if we get an extension or if any other coalition gets traction

Oh right. For some reason I thought Arena was just regular gladiate and thought it was lame.

Why protect before any species of flip though?

In post 6034, Titus wrote:

In post 6029, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 6025, Titus wrote:

In post 6024, NanceFloor wrote:And you said yourself, no competent scumteam pairs two scum together.

I did not say this.

In post 3228, Titus wrote:

In post 3227, themilkcartonkid wrote:

In post 3225, Titus wrote:That's why NL is optimal.

No, because the game could be as easy as oka bef or ank clem or chem creature, that's why lynching a lhf is better than no lynching

Why would any competent scumteam pair themselves?

Again...

Asking for why a team does that =/= no team would

It’s semantics, you clearly didn’t think this or you wouldn’t have asked this question, which is why I don’t understand why you’re still insisting on your ridiculous 3 scum in failed coalition theory.

I’m only sheeping it because no lynch is even worse than that.

In post 6042, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 6034, Titus wrote:

In post 6029, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 6025, Titus wrote:

In post 6024, NanceFloor wrote:And you said yourself, no competent scumteam pairs two scum together.

I did not say this.

In post 3228, Titus wrote:

In post 3227, themilkcartonkid wrote:

In post 3225, Titus wrote:That's why NL is optimal.

No, because the game could be as easy as oka bef or ank clem or chem creature, that's why lynching a lhf is better than no lynching

Why would any competent scumteam pair themselves?

Again...

Asking for why a team does that =/= no team would

It’s semantics, you clearly didn’t think this or you wouldn’t have asked this question, which is why I don’t understand why you’re still insisting on your ridiculous 3 scum in failed coalition theory.

I’m only sheeping it because no lynch is even worse than that.

It's because you don't understand probability and the value of 100% eliminating of scenarios.

That is immensely important to data driven players like myself.

If I was scum, I would have abandoned this effort long ago, raged at town, made sure 3 of the original coalition lived and pegged them as the scum team in lylo. Just to spite.

VOTE: TimeDevil, MariaR, Chennis, 0verkill, Titus, Moongrass, Succinct

I'm 90% sure Moongrass is scum but parking vote here for now.

-TL

oh wait if those "titus coalition" votes counted that was a quickhammer. Sorry.

-TL

lol

(that lol can be interpreted as me throwing my hands up in the air out of frustration)

what made you realize it was a quickhammer only 2 minutes later? why lay down a vote before checking the votes and only check immediately afterwards?

dw about it