Mafiascum.net

In post 6048, texcat wrote:

In post 5973, Scioness Sajj wrote:it's day five and texcat still has less posts than a50. she didn't got prodded even once. posts enough content to not draw attention too much themselves
10/10 lurking

But at least I have posted content, unlike Mylo.

In post 6048, texcat wrote:

In post 5973, Scioness Sajj wrote:it's day five and texcat still has less posts than a50. she didn't got prodded even once. posts enough content to not draw attention too much themselves
10/10 lurking

But at least I have posted content, unlike Mylo.

In post 6044, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 6039, TehBrawlGuy wrote:

In post 6034, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 6030, Golden Robster wrote:you also missed the convenient part out

if you flip red

if you are basing my scummines on that one post. i do really not gain anything from suggesting what i did. if i flip red then my only good reason to suggest what i did would be to protect tbg
and by posting that i would make not only make myself lynched but also him so
i'm losing two scum for one push on texcat

.
idk it's not a bad play if you and tex are both red =. tex red flip makes me look really good, your red flip a lot less so

plus scum clearly have multiple PRs, so if tex has a stronger role you really want to use tonight it's sensible

makes basically no sense if you're the only one of us three that's scum though

VOTE: sajj
if this is red we gotta lynch in me/tex tomorrow imo

so you are saying i was the one that wanted the tex wagon to happen and i put tex and l-2 and then 'tried to convince' RG to vote tex so it could move attention from her to me, and we could get me lynched instead of tex??? im lost

In post 4017, texcat wrote:

In post 4015, Tchill13 wrote:

In post 4004, Vaxkiller wrote:VOTE: kublia khan

In post 4005, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 4004, Vaxkiller wrote:VOTE: kublia khan

wtf is this shit?

Also van just voted kublai. Nobody finds that suspicious?

Vax has done a lot of suspicious stuff. but he's getting a pass for fake claiming vig. While I do understand that the real vig is likely to kill you and that it seems like a stupid play from scum, I'm still not willing to give him a pass for it. Especially since he did it with a wink, "NOONE counter. I aint syaing shit else". But I think there are better votes right now.

In post 4012, Tchill13 wrote:I don't understand why lalendra isn't a good lynch today. She naked voted to get on the wagon. Only scum reads TBG which half the game scum reads... I haven't seen any sorting from her...

In post 4003, wavemode wrote:do we want lalendra anywhere near lylo

I agree that we can't let someone who isn't paying attention to the game, like Lala, to the endgame. I don't think she's a horrible lynch today. But I think Myloninja is a better lynch. Mylo does seem to be paying attention to the game, as evidenced by his continued beetlejuicing. He has not contributed anything at all to the game however. I don't understand why Gamma is willing to give him another day. We've been playing to 5 weeks and Mylo's given us nothing. Why does he get another week?

In post 4018, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 4003, wavemode wrote:do we want lalendra anywhere near lylo

that's terrible approach

In post 4020, texcat wrote:

In post 4018, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 4003, wavemode wrote:do we want lalendra anywhere near lylo

that's terrible approach

Why?

In post 4025, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 4019, wavemode wrote:so you townread lalendra?

i do. i believe i have been pretty clear how i feel about her, it didn't change since yesterday.

In post 4020, texcat wrote:

In post 4018, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 4003, wavemode wrote:do we want lalendra anywhere near lylo

that's terrible approach

Why?

actually, i take that back. that's scummy approach.

why? there is a difference between i vote for you because i think you are scum and i vote you because i don't trust you to win the game in lylo.
do you play to lynch scum or do you play to policy people that may make the wrong decision in lylo? do you want a lynch that people have to take stances on or do you want to have no responsibility policy? are you certain that disengaged lurkers will stay disengaged? are you certain that engaged players won't flake out?
idk maybe i'm wrong but i thought we should be looking for scum, not weakest links. especially in a game like this where, if we assume i'm upper line of useless lurker, we have about 10 players that fit criterium of being a liability to our wincon. you and wave included.

In post 4026, Scioness Sajj wrote:like with argument like that we can as well lynch Ausuka since she hasn't been really paying that much attention to the game, right?

In post 4028, texcat wrote:I'm pretty sure scum is going to have to kill Ausuka before endgame.

In post 6049, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 6046, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 6041, Scioness Sajj wrote:idk if i have been kept alive becuase my reads are bad or i'm just that scummy though. so you will have to figure it out yourself.

this is very self-righteous
what makes you think you'd get killed over the others?

by killed i mean eating the rope
i wouldn't get nked, it never happens

In post 6015, JarJarDrinks wrote:SS really posted those words guys

In post 6057, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 6049, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 6046, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 6041, Scioness Sajj wrote:idk if i have been kept alive becuase my reads are bad or i'm just that scummy though. so you will have to figure it out yourself.

this is very self-righteous
what makes you think you'd get killed over the others?

by killed i mean eating the rope
i wouldn't get nked, it never happens

So you're saying that you think there's a chance that you havent been lynched becuase of how scummy you are and how bad your reads are?

So like, the scummier someone is, the less likely they are to be lynched?

In post 6055, Golden Robster wrote:not deflecting off main wagons

In post 6016, Ankamius wrote:VOTE: Scioness Sajj

In post 6017, Golden Robster wrote:VOTE: SS

In post 6018, JarJarDrinks wrote:VOTE: Scioness Sajj

In post 6019, Skygazer wrote:VOTE: sajj

In post 6053, TehBrawlGuy wrote:

In post 6044, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 6039, TehBrawlGuy wrote:

In post 6034, Scioness Sajj wrote:

In post 6030, Golden Robster wrote:you also missed the convenient part out

if you flip red

if you are basing my scummines on that one post. i do really not gain anything from suggesting what i did. if i flip red then my only good reason to suggest what i did would be to protect tbg
and by posting that i would make not only make myself lynched but also him so
i'm losing two scum for one push on texcat

.
idk it's not a bad play if you and tex are both red =. tex red flip makes me look really good, your red flip a lot less so

plus scum clearly have multiple PRs, so if tex has a stronger role you really want to use tonight it's sensible

makes basically no sense if you're the only one of us three that's scum though

VOTE: sajj
if this is red we gotta lynch in me/tex tomorrow imo

so you are saying i was the one that wanted the tex wagon to happen and i put tex and l-2 and then 'tried to convince' RG to vote tex so it could move attention from her to me, and we could get me lynched instead of tex??? im lost

you said yourself you thought I was dead and nothing was going to happen - hell, I thought I was dead too

it kind of makes sense for you to have been bussing tex for towncred assuming nothing was going to work. once I started her wagon, you didn't vote tex to give it momentum until she was at l-3 even though you were present

you taking the heat afterwards is weird as fuck, but honestly that whole series of wagon shifts is bizarre, so something weird happening does fit

tbh I'd still rather lynch tex first but i don't think that's gonna happen anymore

In post 6063, Krazy wrote:FAM TEXCAT IS A MAIN WAGON

STOP DEFLECTING OFF TEXCAT

In post 6062, Creature wrote:Oh fuck, we fell to their trap again.

In post 6073, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 6062, Creature wrote:Oh fuck, we fell to their trap again.

This sounds like what u were saying when you showed up and saw wheme was about to be lynched. U gonna try to derail this one too?