Mafiascum.net

Feels like several townreads I'd written off just got yanked out from under me... but In a good way that forced me to re-evaluate?

In post 6094, midwaybear wrote:Maybe also because of the multi vote mechanic

probably in that it's not really easy to notice, but also votes aren't the same as prssure, and i guess it's interesting that i was pressuring you a lot more than the people supposedly scumreading you were

---

i thought skitter's points against annie felt uncharitable at the time on day 1 but meh

---

i don't really think pisskop is likely a red flip but like lld said, even if he's not red, he's scum. i'm not whelmed by any of the other options besides my own pet vote in sb9 and midwaybear is now a hard no

In post 6100, Dandelion Wine wrote:Feels like several townreads I'd written off just got yanked out from under me... but In a good way that forced me to re-evaluate?

I feel like I'm stuck between states.

:/

Let's just get it over with so I can have my meltdown in my neighborhood about annie.

VOTE: everyone
UNVOTE: pisskop

Nobody wants 50 more pages of ffery and I melting down ITT.

In post 6095, Dandelion Wine wrote:That plan didn't survivie first contact with the enemy. And honestly, so much of it was potentially off, that I don't know how we're gonna handle it today. I just kind of want to stile S_S, nuke pisskop from orbit, pray we get 2 of the 3 red flipping, and if not cry myself to sleep.

also i think this will net max one scum, if that
but i'm nto sure we're gonna be getting a better wagon in the next 24 hours so what can you do

fwiw if pisskop is green like i suspect nuke sb9 from orbit

are we going to turnstile something_smart or not, btw

If sb9 and annie are scum, why were both trying to get to the other thread so hard?

If they are scum, it implies there's scum positioned to go deep in this thread.

what's the vote count on pisskop?

no E-1 while we're figuring out turnstiling s_s.

In post 6101, petapan wrote:midwaybear is now a hard no

also i agree with this

so does bork.

In post 6108, Deacon Blues wrote:If they are scum, it implies there's scum positioned to go deep in this thread.

also, reminder: the nk also very, very, very strongly points to this

In post 6108, Deacon Blues wrote:If sb9 and annie are scum, why were both trying to get to the other thread so hard?

If they are scum, it implies there's scum positioned to go deep in this thread.

idfk

i'm p sure that's e-2 on pisskop

honestly the scum complacency overnight might just be that you two were strongly townreading the scumz, we might not need to find universal-level townreads

how did you two feel abt fire overnight/eod yesterday again?

In post 6113, petapan wrote:

In post 6108, Deacon Blues wrote:If sb9 and annie are scum, why were both trying to get to the other thread so hard?

If they are scum, it implies there's scum positioned to go deep in this thread.

idfk

If they're both scum, they CAN'T be the only scum that started here. That or they expected pooky or A50 to town it up to an incredible degree after being lackluster enough to be turnstiled to this thread. Assuming no scum team in its right mind would expect pisskop to survive long enough for the threads to merge. That as a tactic doesn't make sense to me.

In post 6115, skitter30 wrote:how did you two feel abt fire overnight/eod yesterday again?

I've never gone above a meh read there. Nacho (when he was thinking our side would have to turnstile in order for the forwards thread to turnstile today, that he'd be ok with firebringer being turnstiled. Which given the plan, was a pretty decent townread.

or can you just summarize who the strong townreads were going into the night?

Leaving the big hood with my thoughts on this in explicit detail shortly.

My thoughts on this are concrete but not a good idea to expose atm.

They will outlive me and reach you if I am unable to tell you myself, ffery.

In post 6114, skitter30 wrote:i'm p sure that's e-2 on pisskop

honestly the scum complacency overnight might just be that you two were strongly townreading the scumz, we might not need to find universal-level townreads

eh thinking abt it more: people who were widely townread and that you two were at least not expressly saying you scumread cuz you were playing p close to your chest.
idk who exactly that was but that's where scum is

UNVOTE: turnstile: something_smart

i feel sick placing this vote but. i guess it'll be worse avoiding it

From the neighborhood:

Nacho's reads at the top.

In post 4640, Deacon Blues wrote:

NACHO, TAMMY NOTES FROM THE NIGHT ONE NEIGHBORHOOD

PART 2 - THE REVERSE THREAD

Nacho posted a list of his confident townreads in the reverse thread.

Superbowl9
Petapan
Deacon Blues
Dandelion Wine
Firebringer
Tenet/upside down sinkhole

[/b]

a lot of nacho, tammy discussion removed.

Cabd's first tier:

Deacon Blues
Dandelion Wine
Firebringer
Tenet

and second tier:

superbowl9
Petapan
Something_Smart

Order in each tiers wasn't seriatim.

I was ok with both lists, but didn't have s_s that high on my own due to not a whole lot of experience, and feeling like his town play was pretty ambiguous: the main things that jumped out at me in the recent games we'd played before was that a fair few of his posts were made with improving thread health as town. From cold meta, I saw he likes to setup-break/spec.

I wasn't seeing enough of either of these to feel super comfortable.

In post 6121, petapan wrote:UNVOTE: turnstile: something_smart

i feel sick placing this vote but. i guess it'll be worse avoiding it

yikes

ok soooo fire has shown up i think on at least three different incriminating lists today
UNVOTE: fire

(i'm p sure i'm already voting, but for like emphasis)