Mafiascum.net

Remember kiddies, a vote for me is a vote for town in this game.

In post 6205, Taly wrote:

petapan wrote:

In post 6199, Taly wrote:

Saber

put

Ulya/I

on a pedestal of constantly stating we bleed towniness?

I mean, that's the impression I got off first glance. I'll look deeper if you'd like.

if that was the impression conveyed then i drastically failed in my mission

give me another chance

peta <3

I'll get to this in-depth later

and thanks to you and

ydra

hap birf

In post 6222, Taly wrote:do i get bday privilege in being heaven'd first

asking is worth the try

yes but there is a tradition for this

you must say BIRTHDAY POWERS ACTIVATE and you get whatever you want

In post 6208, ulyana wrote:

In post 6188, Gamma Emerald wrote:Can you provide meta examples to back up your effort levels being higher as town?

scum games (now with correct trust fall game linked):

In post 2415, ulyana wrote:

In post 2395, unwnd wrote:Has Shiki ever been scum

mini normal 2122 (as team rocket queen)
gacha mafia (as shiki)
a normal blitz ii (as shiki)
chain of command (as euphony {hydra})
student council (as tracy flick)
fall with your friends (as inutile)

these probably(?) the most applicable

town games (chosen by recency and similarity to this game design wise):

mini normal 2214 as shiki
royalty as team rocket queen
menagerie as drusilla
radio buzz as rousseau
trist fall as inutile
emitgbsmod as inutile

and if you want to see my engagement fluctuate similarly to how it did here based on happenstances, i felt similarly during all of royalty, menagerie, trist fall and emitgbsmod so those are probably good examples of that as well

like my point here wasn’t really to towncase myself on meta as i am aware of posting stuff so could potentially subvert it’s that you’re like saying you’re town because of effort and that i am scum because of effort because i was at one point disengaged from game which was in part because of you while not even considering that the model for my scum behavior you were presenting was unlikely

bleh
it's you've efforted that's given me concerns about you, not the fact you've been efforting

In post 6212, SirCakez wrote:what? I ended up being right.

skitter pocketed me too but tbh I've been so hammy about cabd clause that it's time to give it a bit of a rest (yeah I know bringing it up kinda kills that but when I said hammy, ).

VOTE: Taly
idk what the votes are at but I saw 4 recently so let's hammer it to some degree

also I read through large chunks of execution throne and duel event posting

and found that skitter did a lot of protecting of Cakez who did a lot of protecting of Saber during duel event
and that Cakez being the hammer for both the Gemerald execution throne and for Infinity being the blue PT nomination is slightly gross

so I think I'm at Tamora's>Cakez>Ydrasse>??? for scum now but I kinda just want people to make cases (or at least like, a couple sentences of summary) on who they think is mostly likely non-Tamora scum so I can get a better handle on things

gaaaaahhhhh
I don't wanna retract my cakez TR now that it's on the vote thing but I feel like the associative points against him sound good

BIRTHDAY POWERS ACTIVATE

it's party time

lets make it happen

VOTE: Taly

Is that hammer?

yeah that's at least 5 votes and there's only 8 alive

In post 6234, Gamma Emerald wrote:gaaaaahhhhh
I don't wanna retract my cakez TR now that it's on the vote thing but I feel like the associative points against him sound good

Eh. Do your own reading of it before taking my word for it. cakez has good points in his iso too, it's just that literally everyone does at this point.

Skitter I was confident about because I don't think I saw basically any *shining town moments* from her, just a sea of fine and reasonable posts with a few damning posts spread between them.
Being absent from how the early events played out in real-time was nice in that it let me read through everything with a minimum of investment in current reads/how active people were being/etc but also makes it harder to tell the tone of how people were interacting with each other back then and what was at the forefront of people's thoughts on the game at the time, which is prob important for getting a better read on which defenses/attacks of skitter's were actually impactful to the game-state and would have mattered, and which were kind of throw-ins to make herself look like she was active & trying to solve the game.

Yeah that’s fair I think
I should be able to sink my teeth in a bit late tonight

I am still shocked about Fire flipping scum

In post 6243, Tamora's Angel wrote:I am still shocked about Fire flipping scum

honestly why

My research on the first thirty pages had him as town.

In post 6245, Tamora's Angel wrote:My research on the first thirty pages had him as town.

siigh look my dude. Your answer is probably too late at this point to matter to me personally, so if you wanna ignore this feel free, sometimes doing other shit is more fun than playing mafia and I support making enjoyable choices

but you said that skitter spewed town to you from their early game posting already. you're calling reading the game 'research' but you shared literally nothing about any individual posts skitter made, or which interactions between skitter and other players you thought were good, or like...anything specific on what/why you felt early-game skitter was more likely to be town than scum.

that's not helpful or convincing. ya gotta be able to back up what you're saying regardless of your alignment if you want people to listen to you and take your reads into consideration.

I can share my handwritten notes tonight if that helps. I don't have the time at the moment.

In post 6247, Blade Dancer wrote:I can share my handwritten notes tonight if that helps. I don't have the time at the moment.

Well crap. This alt had a short life anyway.

classic alt blunder

this game is wild