Mini 769 - RISK Mafia: abandoned
Forum rules
I honestly can't figure out how it's town to attack the claimed survivor just because he's attacking you. Attacking him won't bring us any closer to finding scum.
Taking a temporary retirement from playing mafia games... damn you invitationals.
Coming in Summer 2010: Yu-Gi-Oh: The Abridged Mafia. The most nonsensical game of mafia you'll ever play.
Note: V/LA most weekends, sorry.
Coming in Summer 2010: Yu-Gi-Oh: The Abridged Mafia. The most nonsensical game of mafia you'll ever play.
Note: V/LA most weekends, sorry.
- MonkeyMan576
- MonkeyMan576
-
MonkeyMan576
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7900
- Joined: November 7, 2008
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Well yeah. >_> I don't even see how it can be considered town though. I'd vote Kast but I'm not bordering him.MonkeyMan576 wrote:Because he's not worried about attacking scum, because he's not town. Duh.Slicey wrote:I honestly can't figure out how it's town to attack the claimed survivor just because he's attacking you. Attacking him won't bring us any closer to finding scum.
@TDC-
-I'm sure you can see the difference between the town as a whole agreeing to a strategy and asking a single player to be bound by a strategy that nobody else is following.
-Whether I was a confirmed roleblocker has no bearing on the point. Killing the territory that is going to attack me is equivalent to roleblocking him. If you think I can't do it, then there is no point to your complaint. If you think I can, then you acknowledge that I am that roleblocker.
-If multiple players were attacking me, I would attack the player who is the strategically best target for maintaining my position. As MM is the only person attacking me, it would be extremely stupid to attack anyone other than him and just let him make me weaker.
Your implication that I would still be attacking MM if he had convinced someone else to attack me is a baseless straw man.
@Slicey-
-False dilemma. Why do you assume I must attack someone this turn? If MM removes his vote, then I will remove mine.
-It is fallacious to claim that attacking someone who is not scum is anti-town or scummy. This is almost identical to attacking an unknown player or even a strongly suspected townie to complete a continent or secure a defensive point. This is actually better than either of the previous scenarios since I am guaranteed to not be weakening other townies.
-Why are you voting for inHimshallibe? How does that bring us closer to finding scum? You have given no reasons for your attack or reasons for suspecting inHimshallibe.
If you are just "playing the RISK game" and think it puts you in a strategically better position, then you are being a hypocrite.
-Strategically, this is the right move even since MM has made it clear that he will attack me.
@MM-
-That makes no sense. If we extend that simplistic way of thinking, then hey, Kast as scum attacking MM obviously isn't worried about attacking town, so he must be some third party role. Since this is an open role game, then that doesn't work.
If we back up a step, MM the independent survivor is engaging in suboptimal play that is anti-town and forcing Kast to react in a way that is the best course of action for the town, based on MM's actions, but not the ideal course of action for the town (which would require MM to actually play as an independent and to his win condition).
-I'm sure you can see the difference between the town as a whole agreeing to a strategy and asking a single player to be bound by a strategy that nobody else is following.
-Whether I was a confirmed roleblocker has no bearing on the point. Killing the territory that is going to attack me is equivalent to roleblocking him. If you think I can't do it, then there is no point to your complaint. If you think I can, then you acknowledge that I am that roleblocker.
-If multiple players were attacking me, I would attack the player who is the strategically best target for maintaining my position. As MM is the only person attacking me, it would be extremely stupid to attack anyone other than him and just let him make me weaker.
Your implication that I would still be attacking MM if he had convinced someone else to attack me is a baseless straw man.
@Slicey-
-False dilemma. Why do you assume I must attack someone this turn? If MM removes his vote, then I will remove mine.
-It is fallacious to claim that attacking someone who is not scum is anti-town or scummy. This is almost identical to attacking an unknown player or even a strongly suspected townie to complete a continent or secure a defensive point. This is actually better than either of the previous scenarios since I am guaranteed to not be weakening other townies.
-Why are you voting for inHimshallibe? How does that bring us closer to finding scum? You have given no reasons for your attack or reasons for suspecting inHimshallibe.
If you are just "playing the RISK game" and think it puts you in a strategically better position, then you are being a hypocrite.
-Strategically, this is the right move even since MM has made it clear that he will attack me.
@MM-
-That makes no sense. If we extend that simplistic way of thinking, then hey, Kast as scum attacking MM obviously isn't worried about attacking town, so he must be some third party role. Since this is an open role game, then that doesn't work.
If we back up a step, MM the independent survivor is engaging in suboptimal play that is anti-town and forcing Kast to react in a way that is the best course of action for the town, based on MM's actions, but not the ideal course of action for the town (which would require MM to actually play as an independent and to his win condition).
Again, when was this actually discussed?Kast wrote:I'm sure you can see the difference between the town as a whole agreeing to a strategy and asking a single player to be bound by a strategy that nobody else is following.
Uhm, no, because he's not any more a Vig than everybody else in this game.-Whether I was a confirmed roleblocker has no bearing on the point. Killing the territory that is going to attack me is equivalent to roleblocking him. If you think I can't do it, then there is no point to your complaint. If you think I can, then you acknowledge that I am that roleblocker.
Your scenario implies that you die if you don't "block him", which is clearly not the case. Far from it, in fact.
But you're not ruling out that you might still attack MM either.If multiple players were attacking me, I would attack the player who is the strategically best target for maintaining my position. As MM is the only person attacking me, it would be extremely stupid to attack anyone other than him and just let him make me weaker.
Your implication that I would still be attacking MM if he had convinced someone else to attack me is a baseless straw man.
Furthermore this
is what suggested to me that you'd still be attacking him.MM has clearly and repeatedly called for others to join his attack on me, so no it is not just about MM attacking me.
- MonkeyMan576
- MonkeyMan576
-
MonkeyMan576
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7900
- Joined: November 7, 2008
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
All of your hypothesis are always based on the assumption that you're town, which most of us disagree with at this point I think. You're not forced to react to me. If you would talk to us about what your next step is, or not attack a pro-town player, or volunteer to give up Australia, or do any number of pro-town things, then it might strengthen your case, but as it is, getting you out of the game is obviously the best course of action for the town at this point. Even if you were town, which I strongly doubt, the possibility of you being scum, however minute or strong it might be, makes it a bad idea for one player to be insanely powerful, and to have all the town's chances for success based on that one player before we can make more accurate judgements on alignement.Kast wrote: @MM-
-That makes no sense. If we extend that simplistic way of thinking, then hey, Kast as scum attacking MM obviously isn't worried about attacking town, so he must be some third party role. Since this is an open role game, then that doesn't work.
If we back up a step, MM the independent survivor is engaging in suboptimal play that is anti-town and forcing Kast to react in a way that is the best course of action for the town, based on MM's actions, but not the ideal course of action for the town (which would require MM to actually play as an independent and to his win condition).
@TDC-
-Initial plan proposal on D1.
-If I just let MM attack me and do nothing, then yes, I will be eliminated. In the short term, he approaches closer to my continent. In the long term he breaks my power base then eliminates me.
-You take a lot of liberties in your interpretation of my post. Nowhere in there do I say anything about what I will do if other people are attacking me. It was a direct response to your claim that I'm mistaken when I said MM is attacking me, calling others to attack me, and promoting an anti-town strategy of constantly eliminating the most powerful player.
@MM-
-Reading fail. In the example you quoted, the assumption is that Kast is scum. If Kast is mafia, then attacking the Survivor shows that he doesn't care about attacking town. This, by your logic, means Kast cannot be mafia.
Regardless of Kast's alignment, if MM the independent survivor decides to adopt the suboptimal play of attacking Kast, then Kast's optimal response is to attack back. This makes no assumptions about my affiliation.
-I am looking at the entire picture. You are fear-mongering by only looking at one unlikely scenario but attempting to emphasize the potential danger of that unlikely scenario.
-Lol, at giving up Australia. I suppose you think it would be best to hand it over to the only confirmed player in the game?
-How do you propose that we make accurate judgments of alignment? If you can find a guaranteed way to show that a player other than me is 100% town, then I'll entertain your joke about handing over Australia.
-Who are "most of us"? MM and Slicey claim to think I am scum with reasons being "Kast is too strong." Slicey has even admitted that he thinks my play is pro-town and I am probably a townie, but can't take the risk that I am scum. TDC has carefully avoided commenting on what he thinks my alignment is. Nobody else is posting.
-Initial plan proposal on D1.
-If I just let MM attack me and do nothing, then yes, I will be eliminated. In the short term, he approaches closer to my continent. In the long term he breaks my power base then eliminates me.
-You take a lot of liberties in your interpretation of my post. Nowhere in there do I say anything about what I will do if other people are attacking me. It was a direct response to your claim that I'm mistaken when I said MM is attacking me, calling others to attack me, and promoting an anti-town strategy of constantly eliminating the most powerful player.
@MM-
-Reading fail. In the example you quoted, the assumption is that Kast is scum. If Kast is mafia, then attacking the Survivor shows that he doesn't care about attacking town. This, by your logic, means Kast cannot be mafia.
Regardless of Kast's alignment, if MM the independent survivor decides to adopt the suboptimal play of attacking Kast, then Kast's optimal response is to attack back. This makes no assumptions about my affiliation.
-I am looking at the entire picture. You are fear-mongering by only looking at one unlikely scenario but attempting to emphasize the potential danger of that unlikely scenario.
-Lol, at giving up Australia. I suppose you think it would be best to hand it over to the only confirmed player in the game?
-How do you propose that we make accurate judgments of alignment? If you can find a guaranteed way to show that a player other than me is 100% town, then I'll entertain your joke about handing over Australia.
-Who are "most of us"? MM and Slicey claim to think I am scum with reasons being "Kast is too strong." Slicey has even admitted that he thinks my play is pro-town and I am probably a townie, but can't take the risk that I am scum. TDC has carefully avoided commenting on what he thinks my alignment is. Nobody else is posting.
Show
T: 9/6.5/0
M: 8/2/1
O: 0/3.5/0
V/LA Pretty much all Weekends and Holidays
M: 8/2/1
O: 0/3.5/0
V/LA Pretty much all Weekends and Holidays
- rajrhcpfreak
- rajrhcpfreak
-
rajrhcpfreak
- I puzzle myself sometimes
- I puzzle myself sometimes
- Posts: 2915
- Joined: December 28, 2004
- Location: Orlando, FL
- Contact:
End of the Day Vote Count
Slicey 2 : inHimshallibe, Budja,
MonkeyMan576 2 : Kast, Kast,
Kast 1 : MonkeyMan576
inHimshallibe 1 : Slicey,
orangepenguin 0 :
Kieraen 0 :
Primate 0 :
Budja 0 :
Green Crayons 0 :
TDC 0 :
Xtoxm 0 :
No Lynch 0 :
Not Voting 6 : Green Crayons, Primate, TDC, Xtoxm, Kieraen, orangepenguin
7 for a majority
- rajrhcpfreak
- rajrhcpfreak
-
rajrhcpfreak
- I puzzle myself sometimes
- I puzzle myself sometimes
- Posts: 2915
- Joined: December 28, 2004
- Location: Orlando, FL
- Contact:
- Green Crayons
- Green Crayons
-
Green Crayons
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Didn't do a damn thing.
Who is everyone's biggest suspicion?
Who is everyone's biggest suspicion?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Yeah, I'll update tonight. Any other changes?
Also, advance warning I'm not planning to attack anyone today, but that will change if I am threatened.
Also, advance warning I'm not planning to attack anyone today, but that will change if I am threatened.
Show
T: 9/6.5/0
M: 8/2/1
O: 0/3.5/0
V/LA Pretty much all Weekends and Holidays
M: 8/2/1
O: 0/3.5/0
V/LA Pretty much all Weekends and Holidays
I think it would be good to have more powers in the game besides Kast.
Currently, a scum Kast would be enormously powerful. If players start to build alternate powers, then we will have more control over the game.
I am (still) intending to eventually control Africa. If other players would try to take control of other regions rather than just sitting there disjointed, we will have a much greater chance of winning,
I don't have a scum reading on Kast but I don't see him as town either and I am uncomfortable with allowing him sole power.
Currently, a scum Kast would be enormously powerful. If players start to build alternate powers, then we will have more control over the game.
I am (still) intending to eventually control Africa. If other players would try to take control of other regions rather than just sitting there disjointed, we will have a much greater chance of winning,
I don't have a scum reading on Kast but I don't see him as town either and I am uncomfortable with allowing him sole power.
Here's the map.
I dunno if Slicey succeeded in his attack against inHimshallibe. Obviously, inHimshallibe didn't eliminate Slicey.
I hope the lurkers are still playing and not completely inactive. It would kinda suck for town if our primary advantage is going completely to waste due to inactives. Some replacements would be nice if people have completely abandoned the game.
I dunno if Slicey succeeded in his attack against inHimshallibe. Obviously, inHimshallibe didn't eliminate Slicey.
I hope the lurkers are still playing and not completely inactive. It would kinda suck for town if our primary advantage is going completely to waste due to inactives. Some replacements would be nice if people have completely abandoned the game.
Show
T: 9/6.5/0
M: 8/2/1
O: 0/3.5/0
V/LA Pretty much all Weekends and Holidays
M: 8/2/1
O: 0/3.5/0
V/LA Pretty much all Weekends and Holidays
I didn't even get to attack for some weird reason. >_> Isn't my spot bordering InHim's?
Taking a temporary retirement from playing mafia games... damn you invitationals.
Coming in Summer 2010: Yu-Gi-Oh: The Abridged Mafia. The most nonsensical game of mafia you'll ever play.
Note: V/LA most weekends, sorry.
Coming in Summer 2010: Yu-Gi-Oh: The Abridged Mafia. The most nonsensical game of mafia you'll ever play.
Note: V/LA most weekends, sorry.
@Slicey-
-Is there a reason you wanted to attack inHimshallibe last turn but no longer wish to do so today?
-It would seem more prudent to sit and stack your armies. Attacking makes you extremely vulnerable to elimination. Do you have some reason to feel that you can safely attack while bordered by at least two players who attacked you last round?
-Are you abandoning Africa for Budja to take over?
-Is there a reason you wanted to attack inHimshallibe last turn but no longer wish to do so today?
-It would seem more prudent to sit and stack your armies. Attacking makes you extremely vulnerable to elimination. Do you have some reason to feel that you can safely attack while bordered by at least two players who attacked you last round?
-Are you abandoning Africa for Budja to take over?
Show
T: 9/6.5/0
M: 8/2/1
O: 0/3.5/0
V/LA Pretty much all Weekends and Holidays
M: 8/2/1
O: 0/3.5/0
V/LA Pretty much all Weekends and Holidays