Page 26 of 29
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:29 am
by Dazed and Confused
↑ Syryana wrote:What do you mean, an appeal to FT? Like, I hammered my partner to get FT to back off?
Well, it's more like, I don't really see why you had to go on and say direct "Let me dispel that notion" at him.
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:41 am
by Syryana
↑ Dazed and Confused wrote:
Well, it's more like, I don't really see why you had to go on and say direct "Let me dispel that notion" at him.
Oh, I see. From my perspective, FT was avoiding a hammer on his scumbuddy and trying to deflect onto me with no more than a "Syryana/Nacho makes a lot of sense".
So my line you quoted was approximately the diplomatic version of "hell no, you and your buddy are going down!"
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:43 am
by Zachrulez
4th vote count of day 3:
FourTrouble - 2 (Cogito Ergo Sum, Syryana)
Syryana - 1 (FourTrouble)
Not Voting: (JasonT1981, Sotty7, Dazed and Confused)
With 6 alive it's 4 to lynch
Deadline: (expired on 2013-03-30 09:00:00)
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:58 am
by Sotty7
↑ Syryana wrote:Hey, Sotty. Since you're leaning towards me as the last scum, what do you think of my hammer?
Meh. Forgone conclusion. You could be doing a lot more to convince me on Four but you're not bothered to do so. You just seem kinda content with the game state right now and that is bothering me.
Same could be said for Four as well I guess. Which is part of the reason why I want to lynch you both.
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:43 pm
by Syryana
↑ Sotty7 wrote:
Meh. Forgone conclusion. You could be doing a lot more to convince me on Four but you're not bothered to do so. You just seem kinda content with the game state right now and that is bothering me.
Same could be said for Four as well I guess. Which is part of the reason why I want to lynch you both.
I made my case on Four. Repeating it won't change your mind.
I'm happy with my play up to this point and I've made my lynch choice. I'm content with that. I'll be happy to answer any questions that you or anyone else puts to me, but at this point I'm just waiting for the non-voters to make up your minds.
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:43 am
by jasonT1981
Stating intention to vote FT. Gonna give it some more time though so we don't get a fast hammer like D1
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 3:44 am
by Syryana
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:Stating intention to vote FT. Gonna give it some more time though so we don't get a fast hammer like D1
What changed your mind? I was under the impression you don't like CES.
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:27 am
by jasonT1981
I don't and I have not changed my mind. but since my other read is FT... well, you do the math.
My vote would be wasted on CES, since it does not seem a viable wagon today. So switching to my other scum read is what I shall do.
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:25 am
by Cogito Ergo Sum
You think you can get me lynched Tomorrow if I'm scum?
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:06 am
by jasonT1981
I can sure as hell try.
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:37 am
by jasonT1981
Alright, since conversation is at a standstill.
vote: FourTrouble
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 12:36 pm
by Syryana
jasonT1981 wrote:Alright, since conversation is at a standstill.
vote: FourTrouble
UNVOTE:
I'm not happy with this. Explain why your "other read" is FT, in detail please.
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:15 pm
by Sotty7
↑ jasonT1981 wrote: ↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Is that something you explicitly thought about? Whether people made sense as RB or Goon?
Eh, not overly... The setups show more chances of a goon flip than a RB flip though.
Do you think CES bussed Nacho from day one with Nacho's RB'er flip. Seriously, answer me
↑ Syryana wrote:UNVOTE:
I'm not happy with this. Explain why your "other read" is FT, in detail please.
r u 4 realz?
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:29 pm
by Syryana
Yes. I don't like it when people put other people at L-1 without explaining themselves. Particularly in view of the fact that D+C has got me paranoid about Jason now.
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 3:14 pm
by Dazed and Confused
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:I don't and I have not changed my mind. but since my other read is FT... well, you do the math.
My vote would be wasted on CES, since it does not seem a viable wagon today. So switching to my other scum read is what I shall do.
...uhh, Sotty/CES, are you really sure this dude is town?
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:39 pm
by FourTrouble
Unvote
Hmm, Syryana's unvote looks pretty town. I'm gonna take a look at Jason again.
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:08 am
by FourTrouble
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:vote: Josh
yup, that was the reaction to my post I was looking.
Someone comes in auto wanting the lynch without question or hesitation, and has since said 0 about it when it died down.
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:I am thinking Nacho, Josh scum team too btw.
Fuck, Jason/Nacho interaction is a lot worse than I recall -- need to think on this.
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:11 am
by FourTrouble
And it gets worse on D2, much worse.
Vote Jason
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:24 am
by Sotty7
↑ Syryana wrote:
Yes. I don't like it when people put other people at L-1 without explaining themselves. Particularly in view of the fact that D+C has got me paranoid about Jason now.
Sure. Right.
↑ Syryana wrote:
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Nacho
BRING DOWN THE THUNDER, IT'S HAMMER TIME!
Whatever you say.
I'm sure he is a tasty mislynch just like in every game he has played ever. Talk to me more about your bussing theory.
↑ FourTrouble wrote:Unvote
Hmm, Syryana's unvote looks pretty town. I'm gonna take a look at Jason again.
lol, no. Syryana's unvote is a desperate play for town cred if I ever saw one.
OMG MY TOP TARGET OF ALL DAY IS AT LYNCH MINUS ONE! ....I better unvote!
Please.
Vote: Syryana
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 5:45 am
by Cogito Ergo Sum
We're not lynching Syryana.
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:35 pm
by Sotty7
pouts
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:51 pm
by Syryana
If I was scum, I'd sit on the FT lynch. No point putting Sotty in sarcastic/melodramatic mode for a minimal gain of towncred.
I find FT's 180 on me interesting. One post makes you think I'm town after you've gone after me all this time?
Jason, why is your other read FT?
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 5:44 pm
by FourTrouble
Sotty, I noted that discrepancy at first too but there is a big difference between your L-1 vote and Jason's L-1 vote -- the quantity/quality of reasoning behind it. I just don't see why scum would take a step back to reevaluate the situation. Why wouldn't he just push my lynch through?
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 5:47 pm
by FourTrouble
↑ Syryana wrote:One post makes you think I'm town after you've gone after me all this time?
Your post made me reconsider Jason. It wasn't just your post alone.
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 5:48 pm
by FourTrouble
CES, what did you think of Syryana's unvote + his earlier hammer on Nacho?