Mafiascum.net

no not sarcastic at all

oops forgot my sarcasm tags

I'm sorry, am I making it too subtle?

In post 618, Tierce wrote:

In post 617, BBmolla wrote:Alrighty. We ready to go to night then?

I don't know, BB. Are we? Are you? Because I look at your posts and I can't tell.

Well I like your case against Parama and wanted to hammer. But if not then okay.

In post 627, BBmolla wrote:

In post 618, Tierce wrote:

In post 617, BBmolla wrote:Alrighty. We ready to go to night then?

I don't know, BB. Are we? Are you? Because I look at your posts and I can't tell.

Well I like your case against Parama and wanted to hammer. But if not then okay.

You're bad at math.

How do you like my case against Parama now if you weren't seeing it before? What is it that you like about it?

He said he wanted to be vig when he supposedly wasn't vig. In the case of him being vig I'd expect a dayvig specification.

Yo,

I'm not reading this shit.

Actually Parama claiming BP as a gambit in the beginning and now vigilante is essentially an SK claim.

VOTE: Parama L-1

I'm not leaving an SK alive with the potential for redirections and the like. Fuck that.

...FFS, lost what I was doing again <_<.

Anyways, was ISO Syryana. In summation: She's town enough for me. 478 has enough points against Parama to keep him as the guy I'd rather see lynched today as well as enough points to not have BB look very good at all. However, Tierce's 482 raises a decent point: You point about parama's insistence on shos-scum was arguably the best of the four you gave back in 243 (depending on where you rank the derphammer, anyways), why didn't you actually include and/or address that as well? And of course, I don't find him not posting to necessarily be a scum indicator, so that doesn't factor in. THe last post in the ISO twinges me a bit, but it's not enough to shake the overall read.

I'm ready to hammer, but is there any reason why I should doubt my Syr-town read?

Oh wow, actually I think I hammered Parama.
I didn't see Shos revote him

Still think the BP fakeclaim and then claim as vig is too coincidental

In post 635, Oversoul wrote:Oh wow, actually I think I hammered Parama.
I didn't see Shos revote him

Still think the BP fakeclaim and then claim as vig is too coincidental

No, it's L-1 since Parama isn't self-voting.

In post 634, Voidedmafia wrote:I'm ready to hammer, but is there any reason why I should doubt my Syr-town read?

Yes

...That was an invitation to explain.

In post 635, Oversoul wrote:Oh wow, actually I think I hammered Parama.
I didn't see Shos revote him

Still think the BP fakeclaim and then claim as vig is too coincidental

It's still L-2. You gotta use the correct voting format or KK will ignore you. ()

In post 638, Voidedmafia wrote:...That was an invitation to explain.

Go ISO Tierce. She's got lots of reasons why I'm scum.

Parama wrote:why can't we lynch voided
let the vig shoot syr
and then lynch me tomorrow if they somehow both flip town?
(if they both flip town I'm done with mafia for a few months, because. really now.)

^^^ yup, wrong format - no vote. but what you said is interesting, lol.

you should read tho, read D1 at least and reactions in D2.

In post 632, Oversoul wrote:Actually Parama claiming BP as a gambit in the beginning and now vigilante is essentially an SK claim.

VOTE: Parama L-1

I claimed BP as a joke, dumbnuts

Hmm...

It seems my gambit did not work as well as I had hoped.

I'll read the thread tonight.

a gambit of
1. I'm not reading
2. I read a few posts
3. I somehow know Parama claimed vig even though I'm not reading
4. Intentionally not voting mafia when there are no mafia dead
5. L-1 I mean hammer I mean L-1 woops

???

I honestly thought that it would have been hammer if I legitimately voted with the correct !x format.

random factoid
shos wagon died almost immediately from a claim that is barely helpful to town and can still possibly be mafia
tell me what's wrong with that picture especially compared to the wagon on me

In post 646, Parama wrote:random factoid
shos wagon died almost immediately from a claim that is barely helpful to town and can still possibly be mafia
tell me what's wrong with that picture especially compared to the wagon on me

>voting Syryana
>inventors "barely" helpful to Town
>shos's ability is proven

Alpha Omega is more interesting than this.

I didn't get to my reread tonight

In post 642, Oversoul wrote:It seems my gambit did not work as well as I had hoped.

It's pretty unlikely that there's only one non-town directed kill, plus Para's reaction to the fakehammer looked pretty fake, so Para is a good lynch. I still think he's scum with Syr (or maybe shos), but worst case he's an SK.



Back to L-1.