Mafiascum.net

Fud, wanna posture a little bit about Empking for me?

In post 624, AngryPidgeon wrote:hes usually pretty active.

i know, i've played with him

what's he like as scum?

In post 625, AngryPidgeon wrote:Fud, wanna posture a little bit about Empking for me?

A little bit later, about to eat and showerbeer, he was my numero uno suspect in my trio as well.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=26373

This was Jake's other game. Only time I've played with him and he was scum.

His posts are definitely more tryhard as scum.

In post 629, AngryPidgeon wrote:His posts are definitely more tryhard as scum.

he was town in this game: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... overview=1


and way more active



and he's pretty active all over the site


in fact, he's posting right now

bacde, get the fuck in here and stop watching me and AP tear each other to pieces

In post 631, kuribo wrote:bacde, get the fuck in here and stop watching me and AP tear each other to pieces

hey whats up

if I had to choose between you and AP I'd vote you because tbh AP is my top townread right now

I still think your rage is townie though

right now I'm feeling torc-scum, who's with me?

VOTE: Torc

last scum is probably one of rach/empking but the VC supports it being empking more

Dammit, this will be extremely bad (emphasis on extremely) bad for town if I die.

Quit with the foreplay and get to the exiting stuff Torc.

Bacde, why not go after Emp first then?

Lets pretend we lynched Empking today and then not actually do it.

torc, post your reads on every player in the game, with your very next post

In post 504, Empking wrote:I'm happy that people are seeing sense on Shadi.

In post 506, Empking wrote:^comically insincere

Planted his vote and then nothing but snipe and adding nothing to the day

In post 531, Empking wrote:Let the record show that night was cut short.

Vote: Fudz

Apparently this is his reason to vote me? And he even said he has everyone else as a town read? Really sounds sincere

In post 540, Empking wrote:

In post 537, kuribo wrote:Why are you speculating about scum not getting a kill in when there was a kill?

I don't think anybody missed a night action and just in case it becomes relevant I noted down the evidence.

Evidence that the mod started the Day slightly early? How can that be useful

In post 543, Empking wrote:What does 'to Katsuki' mean?

Who had the best motive for the game carrying on relatively undisturbed from yesterday?

You do Empking, you are letting everyone else carry on and just sitting back
VOTE: Empking

Pre Edit:

In post 534, Empking wrote:I doubt the scum who failled to get their kill in on time agree with that sentiment. Oh there were no such scum? hmmm

In post 532, kuribo wrote:Empking, is that your only reason for voting fuz?

Oh the two parts of my post were unrelated.

Its just that I've a town read on most players

.

The bolded was his very sincere blanket town read of everyone, except me of course.

Kuribo and AP need to settle down.

I am town reading both of them... Though the town read on AP has a caveat, based on the fact there is probably 2 scumz. But for now I go with what data I have.

AP I know you read Selkies as scumz, but I just dont see that and hey this is not at all like Kuribos play in Gay Mafia. I know he likes to fake claim as scumz... So yeah the whole VT claim feels genuine.


Torc not liking your post at ALL. Don't soft claim like that ugghh. You are just asking to be lynched when you do that. There is an art to soft claiming and that is not it.

will sort through the data and solidify my reads more.

In post 639, RachMarie wrote:I am town reading both of them... Though the town read on AP has a caveat, based on the fact there is probably 2 scumz. But for now I go with what data I have.

What caveat is this?

that there are two scumz is the caveat

I doubt there would be 3 in a 9 player game, and I also doubt there would only be 1 as well so 2 scumz is pretty much given.

In post 640, AngryPidgeon wrote:

In post 639, RachMarie wrote:I am town reading both of them... Though the town read on AP has a caveat, based on the fact there is probably 2 scumz. But for now I go with what data I have.

What caveat is this?

Wait nevermind, abort the question, abort the surprise, abort the babies.

p-edit: ok.

Well I screwed up that link pretty hard.

Hellloooooooo


take me down to the lurkaderp city where the town dont post and the scum play shitty

In post 638, FuDuzn wrote:The bolded was his very sincere blanket town read of everyone, except me of course.

It a very sincere townread of everyone but you, my OMGUsing friend.

Torc i was serious about wanting your reads

When i want appeal to emotion ill scream it out of you

actually you can appeal to emotion if you want. im better at reading emotion than i am logicking

In post 646, Empking wrote:

In post 638, FuDuzn wrote:The bolded was his very sincere blanket town read of everyone, except me of course.

It a very sincere townread of everyone but you, my OMGUsing friend.

So not even a slight explanation of who is town and why(or even why I am scum) is sincere?

Serious question as well, with everyone looking like they want Torc lynched.......why are you ignoring that and going after me?