That's how it came off. It was blunt, and kind of uncalled for.
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:17 pm
by TheIrishPope
Ok
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 4:49 pm
by TheIrishPope
I have got the answer!
Ok, think guys, what would be the only logical explanation for scum to choose Oil, a hydra?
Because a. they suck, or b. to further hydra dissonance
And this hydra doesn't suck! It has two great talented players
So the only logical answer must be:
Scum chose Oil for the heads to argue over who to shoot, making it harder
Now, ask yourselves: Why wouldn't they choose
Kerberos
, a
three
headed hydra?
Simple!
Kerberos is in a scum slot.
Oil, take this into serious consideration.
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 4:54 pm
by notscience
In post 639, TheIrishPope wrote:I have got the answer!
Ok, think guys, what would be the only logical explanation for scum to choose Oil, a hydra?
Because a. they suck, or b. to further hydra dissonance
And this hydra doesn't suck! It has two great talented players
So the only logical answer must be:
Scum chose Oil for the heads to argue over who to shoot, making it harder
Now, ask yourselves: Why wouldn't they choose
Kerberos
, a
three
headed hydra?
Simple!
Kerberos is in a scum slot.
Oil, take this into serious consideration.
Siding with DJ on this?
There's plenty of other reasons to pick Oil for it. First and foremost is that Nacho always can make himself townie, so it removes them if they misfire. Secondly, look at how they've been interacting vs how Kerb has been interacting.
I don't agree with shooting the hydra, bring me legitimate proof and then we'll talk.
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 4:59 pm
by TheIrishPope
I agree that we should shoot the hydra, but not for don's reasons. Don's arguments suck.
But this is the most logical reason.
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 5:00 pm
by Wisdom
Yeah, I don't agree with your logic either, because it assumes that Oil were chosen because they are a hydra.
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 5:00 pm
by Wisdom
No, don argues we should policy shoot the hydra, and that's what you also argue now. So you do side with him.
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 5:04 pm
by TheIrishPope
I am stating that scum did choose the hydra solely for the fact that they are a hydra.
I am saying they are scum. I don't talk of policy shooting, ever.
I side with his ends, but not his means.
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 5:07 pm
by Wisdom
That's just what you think though. Scum possibly chose Oil for other reasons.
Do you have more reasons for Kerberos-scum? Because if not, it's policy-shoot you're suggesting.
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 5:08 pm
by notscience
How would you know if scum choose the hydra unless you were there for the pre-game discussion?
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 5:09 pm
by Wisdom
The gunbearer is chosen by scum, ns.
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 5:10 pm
by Wisdom
Actually I guess you wanted to say "why" instead of "if" there
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 5:11 pm
by notscience
In post 648, Wisdom wrote:Actually I guess you wanted to say "why" instead of "if" there
I did, sorry I'm a bit fried right now. (working on a spanish project last minute and still procrastinating on it)