Mafiascum.net

No one died on Night 1.

Nice.

In post 615, Sakura Hana wrote:Well GiF has caught scumRach before so I'll trust him and sheep him.
VOTE: Rach

In post 616, Bert wrote:GIF, I'm counting on you, bub <3

Vote: Rach

That's lynch -2.

In post 620, fuzzybutternut wrote:*sigh*
alright
VOTE: Rach

In post 621, Saki wrote:VOTE: RachMarie
L-1

One of them is most likely a bus vote.
Discuss.

I believed your read on Rach, even if you just suddenly went from "Rach might be scum" to "VOTE: RACH" after a few posts of hers.

I've never seen Rach-scum before, but you seemed town and my natural inclination was to sheep you.

During the night, I thought about the game and read it again.

Don't like Aquaman, but we need to see more from him/her.

Still don't like Timeater or TNE. I think there's scum in there.

It feels like that was a long night!

And also, no night kill? Do we have a roleblocker out there who knows the identity of one of the remaining scums?

I wouldn't reccomend that they roleclaim at this stage, but that's interesting information to have.

Can someone more familiar with the online version of this game tell me if we have another RVS at this point or not?

VOTE: saki

that seemed like a bus from saki, that was my first thoughts when i saw it was night.

The point of RVS is to generate discussion. Since we have plenty of stuffs to analyze, RVS is no longer necessary.
Also why look for a roleblocker specifically?

In post 629, Mac wrote:VOTE: saki

that seemed like a bus from saki, that was my first thoughts when i saw it was night.

My first thought too, but let me review his posts from the end of Day 1 before I jump into voting.

Toxic answer my question thx

In post 630, GuyInFreezer wrote:The point of RVS is to generate discussion. Since we have plenty of stuffs to analyze, RVS is no longer necessary.
Also why look for a roleblocker specifically?

It could have been a jailer or doctor, but they wouldn't know the identity of the mafia member if they were responsible for the lack of an NK.

Hypothetically, if a roleblocker had targeted the mafia member performing the kill, they would know the identity of the mafia member. If there is also a doctor a jailer in the game, there is a 1 in 3 chance of that person being a mafia member. Because all the other roles that could prevent an NK I can think of are not reliant on targeting a potential scum player, there is no useful information for the town there.

In post 628, toxic-banana wrote:It feels like that was a long night!

And also, no night kill? Do we have a roleblocker out there who knows the identity of one of the remaining scums?

I wouldn't reccomend that they roleclaim at this stage, but that's interesting information to have.

Can someone more familiar with the online version of this game tell me if we have another RVS at this point or not?

Oh no. Why do you automatically assume it's a roleblocker that might have stopped the kill?

P-edit: OK, I see your point. Mac, I like your instincts. I'm going to read back on Saki's ISO.

In post 632, GuyInFreezer wrote:Toxic answer my question thx

Do I smell the beginnings of a tunnel? Just what I needed to wake me up in the morning! (it's just gone 12:03 AM here too so it's morning both in the game and in the UK)

Eww tunneling
Let Sakura do that for me

if it's a doctor save then we have 2 conf town amongst us i think?

and with a jailkeeper we wouldn't have a clue.

either way speculation is useless and we shouldn't claim yet.

Bert also I don't think Tim is scum.
Elitist, yes. But scum? I rly don't see it.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: toxic banana

In post 561, Saki wrote:VOTE: toxic-banana
you suck

ahahaha just read this It's true, I just don't measure up to masters of the game such as yourself sir!

In post 640, Mac wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: toxic banana

Fancy sharing why?

65% certain that toxic is scum at the minute

In post 642, toxic-banana wrote:

In post 640, Mac wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: toxic banana

Fancy sharing why?

iso'd rach, she did nothing but coach you through the game. you are utilizing the newb card too much and i feel like you are being passive towards everyone in this game.

show a bit more aggression, and scumhunting.

I'm actually with Mac on this one, shockingly.

VOTE: Toxic

There's a fine line between newb-town and newb-scum.

But coaching newbs is rach's general playstyle -.-

GIF do you have experience with TNE?

Also, if GIF is the scum and totally "started" the wagon on Rach, then that's a totally different story and I can't 100% discount it at this point.

I would like to know what you saw in Rach's last few posts (two lengthy paragraphs) that suggested she was scum...was it gut?

Toxic has been pretty bad, yes.

So I've just been through Saki's posts from page 22 onwards... here they are in order:

In post 561, Saki wrote:VOTE: toxic-banana
you suck

In post 567, Saki wrote:VOTE: fuzzybutternut

In post 575, Saki wrote:

In post 574, DoctorPepper wrote:Saki, whats with the vote jumping? Seriously, why not just pressure your supposed primary scum read

Time, vote parking and tunneling are not alignment indicative, both town and scum do them.

VOTE: Sakura Hana
ok if you say so

In post 570, Saki wrote:VOTE: DP

In post 621, Saki wrote:VOTE: RachMarie
L-1

A whole lot of vote jumping and then a hammer vote on Rach.

Surely that's when the scum would vote if bussing? Wouldn't want to vote prematurely.

VOTE: Saki

In post 646, GuyInFreezer wrote:But coaching newbs is rach's general playstyle -.-

i have never seen her do that to that extent.