Page 26 of 39
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:19 am
by Brian Skies
Oh my god, typo in the above post. I think he will flip scum, not town.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:42 am
by Brian Skies
And Verbs should be checking me, notscience, or Shii. Preferably not me though, because if Flammus flips town, the noose would be around my neck faster than I could scream "GUYS, NO, STAHP!"
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 3:24 pm
by Shiidaji
unvote
Brian Skies wrote:He was acting suspiciously at the beginning of Day 2.
Elaborate.
Verbs, check me or Brian. If Flammus isn't scum ns-scum or nacho-scum would become pretty evident after a while.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 3:36 pm
by Brian Skies
In post 627, Shiidaji wrote:unvote
Brian Skies wrote:He was acting suspiciously at the beginning of Day 2.
Elaborate.
Verbs, check me or Brian. If Flammus isn't scum ns-scum or nacho-scum would become pretty evident after a while.
I just don't see how you can think notscience was likely to be mafia, and totally miss Flammus.
And I don't mind if I get checked. I'd rather just claim, but whatever.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 3:40 pm
by Brian Skies
By the way, I don't actually have a scumread on you. But if Flammus flips town and I end up dying, those are my updated reads.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 3:51 pm
by Shiidaji
In post 628, Brian Skies wrote: In post 627, Shiidaji wrote:unvote
Brian Skies wrote:He was acting suspiciously at the beginning of Day 2.
Elaborate.
Verbs, check me or Brian. If Flammus isn't scum ns-scum or nacho-scum would become pretty evident after a while.
I just don't see how you can think notscience was likely to be mafia, and totally miss Flammus.
And I don't mind if I get checked. I'd rather just claim, but whatever.
My thought process is pretty clearly explained, I felt that Flammus wouldn't be as likely scum as Titus before the latter was confirmed, and was explaining my ns suspicion. My Flammus read as a whole was unrelated and unshared at that point.
@ the latter post, ffr just say you think I'd be scum should Flammus flip green, it avoids confusion and makes your stance look less wishy-washy.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:04 pm
by Brian Skies
In post 630, Shiidaji wrote: In post 628, Brian Skies wrote: In post 627, Shiidaji wrote:unvote
Brian Skies wrote:He was acting suspiciously at the beginning of Day 2.
Elaborate.
Verbs, check me or Brian. If Flammus isn't scum ns-scum or nacho-scum would become pretty evident after a while.
I just don't see how you can think notscience was likely to be mafia, and totally miss Flammus.
And I don't mind if I get checked. I'd rather just claim, but whatever.
My thought process is pretty clearly explained, I felt that Flammus wouldn't be as likely scum as Titus before the latter was confirmed, and was explaining my ns suspicion. My Flammus read as a whole was unrelated and unshared at that point.
@ the latter post, ffr just say you think I'd be scum should Flammus flip green
, it avoids confusion and makes your stance look less wishy-washy.
I understand.
And the part in bold, I thought that was inferred. I apologize for doing such a terrible job of it.
I'm just really convinced Flammus is scum, and it's getting to the point of aggravation.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:07 pm
by notscience
Can we check Nacho so I don't have a paranoia attack
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:16 pm
by Brian Skies
You still suspect Nacho? Understandable, but why?
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:26 pm
by Shiidaji
Going hiking tomorrow, so won't be around for a bit.
Want more input from Verbs so please don't end the day while I'm out, ciao
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:40 pm
by notscience
I don't suspect him now
But I don't want to have a paranoia spasm
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 6:51 pm
by Brian Skies
I just feel there are better checks.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 6:52 pm
by notscience
True, true.
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:29 am
by Brian Skies
I am disappointed with Flammus' lack of motivation to prove his innocence.
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:38 pm
by Nachomamma8
I am disappointed with a lack of hammer.
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:39 pm
by Nachomamma8
Is there a reason we're dragging out discussion? No one's getting anything out of it.
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:47 pm
by Flammus
Honestly, I should be dead by now. I wasn't really up for defending myself day 2, and it appeared that it would be a quick day anywho. With being busy and coming into a slot deemed by most as scum, it looked like my best bet was to put myself out of the town's misery. If we didn't hit scum day 1, then I wouldve been more actively trying to steer away sucpicion. But I think we could afford a ml at this point, and it would let you guys scumhunt actual scum.
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 2:33 pm
by Nachomamma8
A mislynch at this point is delaying the inevitable and giving scum a chance for no good reason. Why don't you want to find scum?
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 2:50 pm
by notscience
um
Hold the fucking phone
Why did he say "steer away suspicion" rather than find scum
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:24 pm
by Flammus
In post 643, notscience wrote:um
Hold the fucking phone
Why did he say "steer away suspicion" rather than find scum
Because when I replaced in, suspicion was already on me. On day 2, the suspicion is still there. So to not get lynched, I would want to steer away suspicion.
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:25 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 642, Nachomamma8 wrote:A mislynch at this point is delaying the inevitable and giving scum a chance for no good reason. Why don't you want to find scum?
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:25 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 642, Nachomamma8 wrote:A mislynch at this point is delaying the inevitable and giving scum a chance for no good reason. Why don't you want to find scum?
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:48 pm
by Brian Skies
Oh hai Nacho!
Shii isn't convinced for some reason. And if for whatever reason that Flammus might flip town, he wants more information out of this day. Shii is on V/LA by the way. Verbs also shares the same point of view.
But no one is really posting, so can't really scumhunt. Especially with our only confirmed town, Titus, being quiet all of a sudden.
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:52 pm
by Brian Skies
I'm not opposed to extending the day for more information. I just don't see why everyone is being so cautious. There was pretty good evidence against Flammus and he hasn't done much to convince us he's town.
Even so, no matter what alignment you are Flammus, don't you dare selfvote.
1) It hurts town if you're town.
2) If you're scum, it's considered bad manners as you are basically claiming to everyone you're giving up.
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:30 pm
by notscience
Conftown=/=knows scum
It's against the rules anyways
There is no guilty on him, so it's not playing ot either wincon