Page 26 of 96
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:38 am
by MafiaSSK
↑ T S O wrote:Myko, I'm fucking tired of hearing you repeat yourself with your shitty case. It's trash. I addressed the fucking thing. Now go play the game.
I think this post pretty much makes me think of TSO as town.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:45 am
by Anatole Kuragin
↑ MafiaSSK wrote: ↑ T S O wrote:Myko, I'm fucking tired of hearing you repeat yourself with your shitty case. It's trash. I addressed the fucking thing. Now go play the game.
I think this post pretty much makes me think of TSO as town.
People feign outrage all the time as scum.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:58 am
by mykonian
↑ Csareo wrote: ↑ mykonian wrote:Good, csareo, you are here.
↑ mykonian wrote:Regarding flubby, I don't think I get him. His play is erratic. Csareo, by chance, would you still have a link to the place where you know flubber from?
Two ongoing games.
...
↑ Flubbernugget wrote:I'm still drawing blanks on how myko is trying to get his reads. And he's probably going to scum read me for saying I'm drawing blanks. Like that's the kind of logic I feel like he's trying to push. I don't get it. I almost got it in the beginning of the game but now idk.
Likewise. Talk to me.
↑ MafiaSSK wrote: ↑ T S O wrote:Myko, I'm fucking tired of hearing you repeat yourself with your shitty case. It's trash. I addressed the fucking thing. Now go play the game.
I think this post pretty much makes me think of TSO as town.
That's been his standard response. Sits there, calls the case shit, doesn't do jack otherwise. How much more passive than post 600 can you get?
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:00 am
by mykonian
I know anatole has been spewing sensible stuff (and I use that in all meanings it can take), but this is something to keep in mind.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:04 am
by vezokpiraka
I've read everything.
Scum reads: espresso, carstereo and farside
Town reads: reck, mikonyan
The rest are different shades of null.
I'll
vote carstereo
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:13 am
by xRECKONERx
Ugh vezok is town. Okay.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:13 am
by xRECKONERx
vezok can you expand on your carstereo thoughts?
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:13 am
by farside22
↑ vezokpiraka wrote:I've read everything.
Scum reads: espresso, carstereo and farside
Town reads: reck, mikonyan
The rest are different shades of null.
I'll
vote carstereo
Thank you for confirming my scum read.
A newb. You vote the newb.
Prey tell mr. I do nothing but sometimes I do why the person your voting reads scummy.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:14 am
by farside22
Please show meta why this is town vezo.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:15 am
by farside22
Oh and I'd love for an explanation from vezo why Matt isn't even on that list.
Like why null.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:16 am
by vezokpiraka
↑ xRECKONERx wrote:vezok can you expand on your carstereo thoughts?
Yes I can, but it's only phone posting so it might takr a while.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:17 am
by vezokpiraka
Matt is null-town because I can't read him very well.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:19 am
by xRECKONERx
↑ farside22 wrote:
Please show meta why this is town vezo.
When you've played enough games with vezok, you can just get a feeling from the way he formats a post. It's weird. I can't think of any specific meta, it's more of a gut/unspoken meta tell.
Talking to vezok is like learning to speak another language.
Also, I kinda agree with his reads list and I don't think it was the easy way out like you do... both myself & myko have had suspicion thrown our way during the day, yet he reads us as town... you and Espresso are pretty ballsy scum reads... it just seems genuine, not sheepy.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:21 am
by vezokpiraka
↑ Csareo wrote:VOTE: anatole
I warned him that I needed a vote justification.
He'll need a very good story to convince me why he could quickly go post in the other forum, but ignore me here.
↑ Csareo wrote: ↑ Ki-Gi wrote:You answered the first question with the second question (and all your other posts).
Don't ive me that bullshit. Everyone knows that "policy lynch" talk is "scum convincing townies to lynch townies" talk
↑ Csareo wrote:I am worried about lynching him. He's annoying, but not enough to policy lynch.
Having strong feelings that people are using his aggravating personality as grounds for a lynch.
Not completely convinced at this point.
↑ Csareo wrote:I think we should go forward with a policy lynch.
Perhaps an inactive or problematic player.
This posts ping the wrong way. He is way too cautious about voting someone and is afraid of pissing anyone.
Also notice how he doesn't want a policy lynch because it means: 'scum making townies lynch townies' and then asks for a policy lynch on am inactive slot.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:23 am
by xRECKONERx
Oh ew, how did I not see 189?
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:24 am
by xRECKONERx
Oh wow. I think I'm about to sheep vezok? Those four posts are actually really gross.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:43 am
by farside22
Vote: reck
Fake, fake, fake.
I believe Anatole mention most of those post pages ago.
If it was that good reck would have sheeped pages ago
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:46 am
by farside22
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p6135213
Point from Anatole.
The first time pointing out the same fucking contradiction.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:53 am
by xRECKONERx
It's not fake, fake, fake.
I just haven't read, read, read.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:54 am
by xRECKONERx
These posts here are my first real contributions in ~100 posts because there were 4 pages of spamposting and I just skimmed it. Sue me.
Regardless, I don't see where Anatole called you out as scum, farside? So that point still stands.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:54 am
by xRECKONERx
Also Anatole pointed out ONE out of the FOUR posts that vezok quoted, so I'm not sure what you mean by he pointed out most of those posts.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:55 am
by mykonian
it's still shit shit shit. It's still a terrible terrible terrible way to go on csareo.
"I warned him that I needed a vote justification." is basically the worst bit of those 4 quotes, and I wish wish wish people wouldn't be stupid stupid stupid about logic.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:58 am
by farside22
↑ xRECKONERx wrote: ↑ farside22 wrote:I have a simple question.
Maybe I missed it, but how do you like a case about a player and how it's put together and think the player is talking about someone else?
Because myko mentioned Matt in his case on TSO and for some reason Matt's name was on my mind when I was writing up my response.
Have you
never
been writing something down and having a conversation with someone and accidentally wrote down what you were saying/what the other person was saying instead of what you meant to write?
↑ xRECKONERx wrote:"Myko is town...I liked his case...I don't want to lynch Matt"
This are the three statements made in that post.
↑ xRECKONERx wrote:I voted him and didn't mention flailing, so did MattP
So your decision to hand-wave the wagon away by misconstruing Espresso's reasons as the entire wagon's reasons is really bad
To continue the fakeness of reck.
You have the good case on Matt, and it was tso case.
Fun fact myko I believe mentioned Matt once with the rest tso.
So fake read.
To his vote on Anatole.
The only pushing of the wagon when I posted was between ESP and Anatole so his comment to me about handing waving a case that is being primary pushed is by esp. Not him or Matt.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:59 am
by xRECKONERx
Hmm. farside's reaction here is weird.
> vezok calls her scum
> I say vezok's reads seem genuine/not faked
> farside votes me
This seems like she's preempting a wagon on her by trying to paint me as scummy for something that isn't actually scummy.
My questioning of vezok on Csareo leads to me agreeing with the posts pointed out... farside says that it's fake, because:
"If it was that good reck would have sheeped pages ago"
Okay... so then there's a couple options here:
1) I, as scum, read Anatole's case and didn't agree with it
strategically
(why?) but then
strategically
agreed with vezok's case when he already had a town read on me (why?)
2) I, as either alignment, skimmed/didn't read Anatole's case and then agreed with vezok when I actually saw the posts in question.
One of them makes literally no sense and has no scum motivation behind it, the other is null. farside's vote here is very weak.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 5:00 am
by xRECKONERx
#647: Farside votes me for a really dumb, weak reason that can be completely dismantled, then proceeds to go iso hunting to cherry pick posts to fit her bad vote.