Page 26 of 85

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 12:38 pm
by Beck
He knows that somebody else visited egg

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 12:39 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
Somebody else?

How?

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 12:40 pm
by Beck
His scum buddy who killed egg obviously, hence why it's called a scum slip

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 12:41 pm
by Beck
Or maybe it was him, but less likely

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 12:42 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
That would mean that Desp is scum then?

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 1:02 pm
by Beck
But DT claimed he saw nobody, so we don't know who did the kill.

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 1:04 pm
by Beck
So not sure what DT is doing but PC definitely knows more info than everyone else

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 1:07 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
Hmm, I just don't see it.

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 2:02 pm
by Beck
that's not my problem

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 3:47 pm
by Perfect Chaos
Beck, are you fucking dense? DT already went down the road that you are going down and came to the correct conclusion, that they misread what I wrote fitting what they were looking for.

My question may not have been formed in the best way, so I'll rephrase so you can understand it better. I asked if they saw Desp visit Egg when no one else did. What that means is "You (DT) are claiming to have watched Egg last night. You say that you have a guilty (basically) on Desp as a result. So I want to clarify that you saw Desp and no one else visit Egg last night." Does that make it easier for you to understand.

Jesus, in every game I play as town I either get accused of being the most manipulative scum player ever or a fucking moron.

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:00 pm
by Beck
No I'm not dense, you can spin it however you want but its obvious what you said. Your reaction seemed off to me also so I'm good where I'm at

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:07 pm
by Perfect Chaos
Its obvious what I said, even though the person who thought they "got me" came out and said that they misread it? Its obvious that they were trying to claim a guilty on Desp and I wanted to make sure there was no room for error before I placed a vote? Its obvious that they were running a gambit where in the end no one was seen, especially not Desp? What really is obvious is that you are looking more and more desperate to find someone to push for a lynch. Yesterday it was Pro for seeming "fake townie" and today it is me for a "slip." This push is bad and coming on the heels of yesterdays bad push it looks even worse. By all means though, stay strong there brother. Park your vote on a townie if you feel like that is where it is best.

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:07 pm
by Beck
Perfect Chaos wrote:So I want to clarify that you saw Desp and no one else visit Egg last night."

Also since this is what you say you meant.

town wouldn't ask this question IMO.

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:09 pm
by Beck
Don't worry, prolapsed is still scum

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:09 pm
by shos
geraintm wrote:Aronis jumped in desp after someone had claimed to have a result on them. To be honest, I would have too if I had been around.
Then once the claim got back tracked, toffee jumps on aronis for being oppotunistic.

Shos makes some case against aronis, I don't mind this post.
Ace jumps easily onto aronis.

Aces three votes in this game have all been on townies...

VOTE: theaceofspades

I have revised the said page and, well, I can agree with this post. Aronis voted BEFORE it was backtracked, and then was 'umm wtf?' andthat can definitely come from a townie. I mean, when I first read the 'implying guilty on' post, I was thinking 'oh cool, this solves the day real quick', so if that was all that was there, I probably would've voted either..
so as a start I'm gonna UNVOTE: Aronis.
Now, checking out Ace's ISO shows really great emptiness. except for one post in ISO9 in the spoiler, there's absolutely fucking nothing, loads of fluff and quotes and votes, and I'm totally joining on this one.
VOTE: spades <<<racist lol
Beck wrote:Why are we not wagoning scum yet? He slipped

vote: PC
That slip is not a slip. DT has said it very vaguely, "I am strongly implying bla bla". I mean, why wouldn't he just say "Desp visited Egg tonight" if he got that? why say something vague and odd? so he questions this directly - did you see desp and ONLY desp visit egg? makes super sense to me.

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:10 pm
by Beck
Gonna have go agree to disagree mate

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:14 pm
by Perfect Chaos
Beck wrote:
Perfect Chaos wrote:So I want to clarify that you saw Desp and no one else visit Egg last night."

Also since this is what you say you meant.

town wouldn't ask this question IMO.


Town wouldn't ask if a single person visited the person who died? Why the fuck would they not? If more than one person visited Egg then I would ask how DT could be so sure that Desp made the kill. Keep pushing this angle though, its making the game interesting at least.

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:14 pm
by shos
Double Trouble wrote:Strongly implying a guilty on Desp here. Let me be a little more direct. We were watching Egg last night.

Holding firm the team is Desp shos BBT. Good night.

~Trouble

ok so beck. have a seat.
you see this, as a town. someone 'strongly implies a guilty on desp' - does not vote desp - and calls an entire scumteam.

now take a look from the other PoV: assume you watched Egg last night, and saw desp, and only desp, visit egg. would you say the above or, perhaps something like "I watched Egg and only Desp visited him. Desp claim please"?

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:17 pm
by Beck
Perfect Chaos wrote:
Beck wrote:
Perfect Chaos wrote:So I want to clarify that you saw Desp and no one else visit Egg last night."

Also since this is what you say you meant.

town wouldn't ask this question IMO.


Town wouldn't ask if a single person visited the person who died? Why the fuck would they not? If more than one person visited Egg then I would ask how DT could be so sure that Desp made the kill. Keep pushing this angle though, its making the game interesting at least.

Because he implied that desp did it, town wouldn't ask "you sure nobody else visited?" Scum who knew desp wasn't scum would ask it though.

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:18 pm
by Beck
shos wrote:
Double Trouble wrote:Strongly implying a guilty on Desp here. Let me be a little more direct. We were watching Egg last night.

Holding firm the team is Desp shos BBT. Good night.

~Trouble

ok so beck. have a seat.
you see this, as a town. someone 'strongly implies a guilty on desp' - does not vote desp - and calls an entire scumteam.

now take a look from the other PoV: assume you watched Egg last night, and saw desp, and only desp, visit egg. would you say the above or, perhaps something like "I watched Egg and only Desp visited him. Desp claim please"?

You're wasting your time

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:23 pm
by Aronis
Beck wrote:
Perfect Chaos wrote:
Beck wrote:
Perfect Chaos wrote:So I want to clarify that you saw Desp and no one else visit Egg last night."

Also since this is what you say you meant.

town wouldn't ask this question IMO.


Town wouldn't ask if a single person visited the person who died? Why the fuck would they not? If more than one person visited Egg then I would ask how DT could be so sure that Desp made the kill. Keep pushing this angle though, its making the game interesting at least.

Because he implied that desp did it, town wouldn't ask "you sure nobody else visited?" Scum who knew desp wasn't scum would ask it though.

What if I'm a cop and I visited him last night?

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:23 pm
by Perfect Chaos
If I was scum and knew that Desp was town, why wouldnt I just vote Desp and point a finger at him yelling "SCUM!!!"

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:26 pm
by Aronis
Perfect Chaos wrote:If I was scum and knew that Desp was town, why wouldnt I just vote Desp and point a finger at him yelling "SCUM!!!"

Because scum wouldn't do such a mean thing. :roll:

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:28 pm
by Beck
Cause you would be afraid of being attacked, sort of how aronis is getting attacked for voting desp...

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:30 pm
by Perfect Chaos
So asking for clarification before voting would be scummy to you, and voting for him without asking is scummy looking. I guess I should have just lurked the fuck out of the thread and waited, right?