↑pisskop wrote:
Texcat reads in Posts 165, 190, 288, and then his backflip in 523; despite texcat having done nothing to improve anything ever.
Could you describe how it's a backflip? I see some wavering, but their backing off of texcat is apparently based on texcat's explanation in post 170.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 12:08 pm
by Morgan
↑Sup-Zero wrote:Considering that most of the people pushing me are basing their suspicions on hopes and dreams, I'd say that it's not too far from the truth.
↑BBmolla wrote:Sup wagon is pretty garbage just by who is pushing it.
This is literally all you ever have to say about wagons. Give me a reason to care about your posts.
You don't have to care about them. I'm just giving my thoughts, take em or leave em.
That's incredibly unhelpful. If you're not going to give reasons, or anything to make me rethink my opinions outside of "you're wrong," then I will always choose to leave your thoughts in the dust. This is both a team game and a game of manipulation, in case you forgot.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 12:11 pm
by Morgan
Is lurking a tell for slimer? I've only had one town game with them.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 1:50 pm
by texcat
I played open 574 with a lurking town slimer not too long ago. Don't think I've seen the scum slimer.
↑Shinobi wrote:I know what you're saying about my supposed buddy's wagon, but it's still kind of baseless. What's the difference between town and scum voting vettrock?
Scumread on texcat is still consistent and even if it wasn't saying that "it's not consistent" without pointing to any of texcat's posts where she's doing things and saying "there's nothing there" is useless. Even then I admitted that it's my idea to scum read texcat and not xay's.
Okay.
unvote
↑Herodotus wrote:
Could you describe how it's a backflip? I see some wavering, but their backing off of texcat is apparently based on texcat's explanation in post 170.
. I guess I got overzealous. Sup pointed it out well. 170 is read as genuine.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:10 pm
by Teapot
I'm going away for a long time, I'm afraid you're going to have to replace me. I'm sorry about this, I enjoy this game
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:20 pm
by BBmolla
↑Morgan wrote:That's incredibly unhelpful. If you're not going to give reasons, or anything to make me rethink my opinions outside of "you're wrong," then I will always choose to leave your thoughts in the dust. This is both a team game and a game of manipulation, in case you forgot.
Cool then just trust me and we got no problem, I'm not trying to manipulate anyone.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:24 pm
by BBmolla
Vettrock's ISO makes my Hero-Scum read harder.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:26 pm
by BBmolla
And I don't mind lynching slimer either
But I think Sup is a poor lynch.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:29 pm
by BBmolla
Them being both scum means Hero would be bussing slimer when it's only the two of them left which is unlikely
So probably not scum together?
I'm still with fine both dying.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:31 pm
by BBmolla
UNVOTE: VOTE: slimer
Feeling this atm.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:32 pm
by BBmolla
I still think hero needs to die regardless, but I'm feeling slimer's play is consistent with him being scum and am more confident there. Notably the questions he doesn't actually give a shit about, just trying to seem active.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:35 pm
by BBmolla
And before you come in and say "Molla, if slimer is scum, Hero is clearly town because of his crusade against him." I disagree. Replacing in and scumreading slimer-scum is very unrisky, especially when not many people were scumreading vettrock. Once vettrock died, it put his team in a shitty position, but I figure he figured it'd be better to try to go through with his bus instead of back off.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:37 pm
by BBmolla
Also if it isn't evident, I really haven't been reading your posts hero. I now understand the reaction image.
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 6:39 pm
by BBmolla
(Also, more people should slip in they think I'm scum so I don't get vig shot)
170 is read as genuine.