Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 11:19 am
This whole talk better Tier and Flub makes me insanely uncomfortable.
Your gut doesn't say that, my posts in our scum PT in our mutual scumgame says that. Wherefore art thou trying to take credit?
Page 26 of 55
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 12:05 pm
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 12:59 pm
...you're trying to discredit my scum read of you because you said you'd do what you're doing here?
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:05 pm
Elbrim, who were you scumreading at the end of yesterday?
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:06 pm
I've considered that Axle's role made him suicide if town was lynched d1, but that doesn't explain why scum didn't powerbus him d1 for town cred.
It seems extremely likely he was vigged.
It seems extremely likely he was vigged.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:06 pm
Actually, not even, I just reread that scum pt and you said nothing of the sort. so you're trying to discredit my thought with something you never even said, and if you had it would only have made my argument stronger.
Beli lynch now plz.
Beli lynch now plz.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:07 pm
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:15 pm
I have thought that powerbussing might have happened though hence why flub is awkward.
@Elbrim, Because I want to be insane town Titus.
Let's lynch farside.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:16 pm
VOTE: Farside
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:19 pm
I don't see very much interaction with axel and vm.
I also support the beli wagon I agree with elb.
I also support the beli wagon I agree with elb.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:26 pm
↑ Elbirn wrote:Even with BRantz flipping town I still don't think I like Belisarius. That clear logical contradiction feels like agenda to me. Why did he want BRantz wagon to fail, but he wanted to push through a policy lynch? My gut says he would scumbuddy town to set up false associatives for after he dies. And then there's 529 which again is crap and looks like the kind of thing he did in my past game with him.
Non-commital, wishywashy stance on your buddy much?
Belisarius
I don't think that is something scum would do with a suicidal partner....
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:26 pm
This is problematic though. Considering that axle likely knew he was going to die then I would venture a guess that he would have been interacting with that very thought in his mind.
Pretty much anytime I look at his posts it becomes a giant befuddled WIFOM. I am not sure we can draw anything concrete from his posts.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:34 pm
Where is the reasoning on beli?
Yesterday I understood the case - he was defending BR a lot - to much particularly with the scum case around him. Now we have a flip and BR was town - that certainly does not lead me to scum. Then he jumped on my wagon with a weak reason but a reason nonetheless. There was some early pressuring titus but nothing that was scum worthy IMHO.
Yesterday I understood the case - he was defending BR a lot - to much particularly with the scum case around him. Now we have a flip and BR was town - that certainly does not lead me to scum. Then he jumped on my wagon with a weak reason but a reason nonetheless. There was some early pressuring titus but nothing that was scum worthy IMHO.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:40 pm
I would like to hear VM on last nights occurrences.
Where you at VM?
Where you at VM?
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:47 pm
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:50 pm
↑ FA_Q2 wrote:↑ Elbirn wrote:Even with BRantz flipping town I still don't think I like Belisarius. That clear logical contradiction feels like agenda to me. Why did he want BRantz wagon to fail, but he wanted to push through a policy lynch? My gut says he would scumbuddy town to set up false associatives for after he dies. And then there's 529 which again is crap and looks like the kind of thing he did in my past game with him.
Non-commital, wishywashy stance on your buddy much?
Belisarius
I don't think that is something scum would do with a suicidal partner....
Barely anyone communicated with axel.
I'll put a note to check into suicidal scum sometime soon as to what, when and why.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:55 pm
I support a Belisarius lynch. I don't really know or care why Elbirn does, but I was scumreading him d1.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:55 pm
VOTE: Belisarius
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 1:58 pm
↑ goodmorning wrote:"Let's hear it", said Humpty Dumpty. "I can explain all the poems that ever were invented--and a good many that haven't been invented just yet."
Elbirn, Axle, and Tier are V/LA.
Flubbernugget replaces Aeronaut, deadline has been modified.
↑ goodmorning wrote:This sounded very hopeful, so Alice repeated the first verse:
Elbirn, Axle, and Tier are V/LA.
Prodding some people or something.
↑ goodmorning wrote:'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
Some people are probably V/LA.
↑ goodmorning wrote:"That's enough to begin with", Humpty Dumpty interrupted: "there are plenty of hard words there."
So since titus isn't doing this for some reason let's review.
Faq was at l1 as was brantz. Axel scum could have lynched faq but he never said boo towards the player. I'll leave that wifom for a little and note that yakko and vm stayed on brantz, but vm switched for unknown reason and all titus did was push on titus and brantz and I don't recall anything from titus or axel day one.
Still have the vm and titus paranoia due to lack of interaction from both of them hence why my vote stands on vm currently.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:18 pm
↑ TierShift wrote:I think axl WAS set to die at N1, without a scum kill. This makes the setup most probably 9:2 after N1, which is pretty much balanced if town is weak.
I don't think him suiciding is too townsided or replacing the NK is too townsided. A NK would make it evens, which is something the mod might have tried to prevent.
This actually makes sense. Whatever stopped the NK might have very well caused the suicide to take place. That is the only thing that fits with current information that we have thus far. We night have gotten very lucky with this night.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:48 pm
faq2 I might like you.
cos tier is pretty obvsly town here.
still stand behind my town!jon read who is witness protection if he flakes i am going to dropkick him in his kneecap.
in other newz titus, far and tso are not in my liking pool titus last tso in the forefront and far in the middle but not losing site of those who are curling around the edges. I don't even know who they are but they are there and it will become more apparent as time goes by.
I am contemplating by the tumtum tree.
cos tier is pretty obvsly town here.
still stand behind my town!jon read who is witness protection if he flakes i am going to dropkick him in his kneecap.
in other newz titus, far and tso are not in my liking pool titus last tso in the forefront and far in the middle but not losing site of those who are curling around the edges. I don't even know who they are but they are there and it will become more apparent as time goes by.
I am contemplating by the tumtum tree.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:14 pm
"Well, 'slithy' means 'lithe and slimy'. 'Lithe' is the same as 'active'. You see it's like a portmanteau--there are two meanings packed up into one word."
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:25 pm
↑ TierShift wrote:↑ Flubbernugget wrote:I thought I saw dissonance between your way of looking at axle for associatives and your actual associatives with him.
I don't understand what this means. What exactly do you think you saw?
I saw you suggesting he was a good vig target as distancing and a possible attempt to waste a town kill. However it is more likely that you share my sentiments of how apathetic his posting can make a game.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:28 pm
Mollie, you never like me.
Tier seems to know a lot about a suicidal role that the mod is conviently unable to clarify.
Tier seems to know a lot about a suicidal role that the mod is conviently unable to clarify.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:29 pm
@Farside, I don't do vca until day 2 or 3 usually. Plus I wanted to know what Axle knew when he imploded.