Mafiascum.net

In post 624, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I'm not really seeing why that all can't be easily be faked but I do like the questions he's asked after a quick reread of his ISO. I only dislike one. What do you think about his vigilante question? Also, what do think about him not voting anyone currently and being one of the few people that has yet to vote?

In post 624, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:What do you think about his vigilante question?

In post 624, Lil Uzi Vert wrote: Also, what do think about him not voting anyone currently and being one of the few people that has yet to vote?

In post 625, Zekromaster wrote:

In post 624, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I'm not really seeing why that all can't be easily be faked but I do like the questions he's asked after a quick reread of his ISO. I only dislike one. What do you think about his vigilante question? Also, what do think about him not voting anyone currently and being one of the few people that has yet to vote?

I hoped to get some more answers, btw. I only got two, and one was basically "I'd kill a random inactive player" which isn't that useful.
Also, I know the questions aren't directed at me, but I wanna be completely transparent about myself - I just don't feel like there is someone I'd want to vote right now. I'm confident in my scum reads, but I'd still prefer to get my facts straight before saying "Hey, I want this one dead!".

In post 627, Ramcius wrote:

In post 625, Zekromaster wrote:

In post 624, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I'm not really seeing why that all can't be easily be faked but I do like the questions he's asked after a quick reread of his ISO. I only dislike one. What do you think about his vigilante question? Also, what do think about him not voting anyone currently and being one of the few people that has yet to vote?

I hoped to get some more answers, btw. I only got two, and one was basically "I'd kill a random inactive player" which isn't that useful.
Also, I know the questions aren't directed at me, but I wanna be completely transparent about myself - I just don't feel like there is someone I'd want to vote right now. I'm confident in my scum reads, but I'd still prefer to get my facts straight before saying "Hey, I want this one dead!".

voting now isn't for lynching, but for pressure

In post 489, Land of Xanth wrote:

In post 467, PeregrineV wrote:Hmmmmmmmm.

Vote: Harp

Why?
-Ali

In post 599, SlySly wrote:

In post 589, James3 wrote:he'll claim something important shortly before the day ends in order to try to cause a nolynch.

Way to burst my bubble. I was hoping to surprise everyone.

In post 616, Zekromaster wrote:@James3, CommKnight, AnyoneWhoClaimedOrWantsToClaim:

If you are really your role, why do you think claiming D1 is a good idea?

.
@James3: Yes, I know, meta. But either you're bad town or hiding behind meta, no one sane would ever claim TWO DAYS BEFORE HIS FIRST RESULT. Zekromaster would like some more practical and logical answer, as he thinks "meta" isn't the real reason behing that claim.

In post 575, D3f3nd3r wrote:

Vote count and prods will be up within the hour.

In post 578, D3f3nd3r wrote:

VC 1.8 (1/22/17)

CommKnight [L-9]

Land of Xanth [L-9]

TTTT [L-9]

Ramcius [L-8]

CommKnight

Pepchoninga [L-9]

SlySly [L-6]

Lil Uzi Vert, James3, Land of Xanth

Harp [L-6]

PeregrineV, ssbm_Kyouko, TTTT

Vifam [L-9]

Narna [L-9]

PeregrineV [L-8]

Tywin Lannister

Skelda [L-9]

TheFuzzylogic99 [L-8]

Ramcius

James3 [L-8]

SlySly

Zekromaster [L-9]

ssbm_Kyouko [L-9]

Tywin Lannister [L-9]

Lil Uzi Vert [L-6]

Skelda, Vifam, Narna

No Lynch [L-9]

Not Voting [4]

Pepchoninga, Harp, TheFuzzyLogic99, Zekromaster

Deadline is on 1/30 at 5:30pm EST, in (expired on 2017-01-30 17:30:00).

With 17 alive, it is nine to lynch.

V/LAs:
James3 is V/LA through Sunday.

Prodding Narna, Skelda, and Harp.

In post 631, James3 wrote:

In post 599, SlySly wrote:

In post 589, James3 wrote:he'll claim something important shortly before the day ends in order to try to cause a nolynch.

Way to burst my bubble. I was hoping to surprise everyone.

Claim. Now.

In post 591, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:yeah wth nobody's claiming at L-6 lol

In post 631, James3 wrote:

In post 599, SlySly wrote:

In post 589, James3 wrote:he'll claim something important shortly before the day ends in order to try to cause a nolynch.

Way to burst my bubble. I was hoping to surprise everyone.

Claim. Now.

In post 616, Zekromaster wrote:@James3, CommKnight, AnyoneWhoClaimedOrWantsToClaim:

If you are really your role, why do you think claiming D1 is a good idea?

.
@James3: Yes, I know, meta. But either you're bad town or hiding behind meta, no one sane would ever claim TWO DAYS BEFORE HIS FIRST RESULT. Zekromaster would like some more practical and logical answer, as he thinks "meta" isn't the real reason behing that claim.

I always claim day one. You can check my references if you like. I do it because I find it to be a profitable game strategy, as it provokes all sorts of reactions that allow me to get reads on people.

In post 597, D3f3nd3r wrote:

Prodding PeregrineV and Tywin Lannister.

In post 634, TTTT wrote:

In post 631, James3 wrote:

In post 599, SlySly wrote:

In post 589, James3 wrote:he'll claim something important shortly before the day ends in order to try to cause a nolynch.

Way to burst my bubble. I was hoping to surprise everyone.

Claim. Now.

Are you claiming quintuple-voter here?
bcuz to me it looks like Sly is at L-6

In post 636, Zekromaster wrote:

In post 631, James3 wrote:

In post 599, SlySly wrote:

In post 589, James3 wrote:he'll claim something important shortly before the day ends in order to try to cause a nolynch.

Way to burst my bubble. I was hoping to surprise everyone.

Claim. Now.

In post 616, Zekromaster wrote:@James3, CommKnight, AnyoneWhoClaimedOrWantsToClaim:

If you are really your role, why do you think claiming D1 is a good idea?

.
@James3: Yes, I know, meta. But either you're bad town or hiding behind meta, no one sane would ever claim TWO DAYS BEFORE HIS FIRST RESULT. Zekromaster would like some more practical and logical answer, as he thinks "meta" isn't the real reason behing that claim.

I always claim day one. You can check my references if you like. I do it because I find it to be a profitable game strategy, as it provokes all sorts of reactions that allow me to get reads on people.

I: "Don't answer with meta!"
James3: [Some more meta plus "it just works!"]

In post 610, Tywin Lannister wrote:So there's absolutely nothing substatially new being said between my last post Friday night to my latest Sunday night. That's still not 48 hours either, so idk why I was I prodded?

Anyway, here's everything that's happened in the past 2 days: Sly keeps being scummy on purpose (seriously, wtf?), Fuzzy says his lynch is fine, Ram wants to policy lynch fuzzy for it, hark I forgot what his stance was and am too lazy to reread it, Kyouko SRs hark for his stance that I forgot, LoX SRs Sly, Vifam hasn't said anything game related, I forgot the other half of the player pool for being inactives, peregrinV I quoted below, Uzi TRs everyone apparently, James wants Sly to claim, and everyone else is still pretty much still inactive. Who'd I forget? I'm on phone so can't go back to read without this getting deleted, but that's about everything anyways.

I will say that if I got prodded (assuming it wasn't a mistake), then that means half the game is about to be replaced.

@PeregrineV:

In post 450, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 323, Tywin Lannister wrote:@peregrin: okay so calling half my case on Sly OMGUS is still different than saying everything I said boils down to OMGUS. That's not true, because I don't vote someone I don't think is scum, and the definition of OMGUS in MS's own wiki is: OMGUS stands for "Oh My God, You Suck (for voting for me)!". it is sometimes used as a shorthand to indicate that you are voting for someone primarily because they voted for you.

1. Sly isn't voting me
2. I've clearly stated why I SR him. It just so happens that his misreps, shading, and flat out lies were against me.

So again: why do you ignore the actual case and everything both he and I have said, and instead try to discredit my CASE/SR using a buzzword that doesn't fit? Do you TR Sly, and if so, why? If not, why are you defending him? He seems pretty capable of handling himself here.

1. Spirit of OMGUS - (you scumread him for him scumreading you)
2. I guess when you confront him about those misreps, shading, and lies, I'll eagerly read both of your posts thoroughly.

I null-read Sly, because of my experience playing him in past games. Time will tell, I suppose.

I'm mostly trying to get a read off of you, because there is a sense of activity from you, but it's not seeming to reach the conclusions I expected.

1. Fine. I don't really care enough to argue this point beyond saying I don't agree that it fits. It looked like a buzzword being thrown around as a chainsaw instead of you actually believing it, but I'm not gonna push something that I can't prove.

2. You don't think I already have? I'm kind of wondering if you read any of it? Also, why haven't you asked him yourself if my questions aren't getting all the answers you wanted to see? Why would you eagerly wait for others to post questions/thoughts instead of doing it yourself?

3. What was your experience of him in past games? Did he look as scummy in those games as he does here, and what did he flip? I'm guessing you've seen him act scummy in both town and scum alignments for you to null read him here? Has this read been updated at all since his latest string of posts, or do you hold firm to the null stance?

4. What conclusions were you expecting me to reach? I'm curious as to what those are. You seem to want to direct me somewhere by the tone of multiple posts directed at me, but where, and why? Do you have specific players you SR that you want me to SR as well, or what are you saying about me 'not reaching the expected conclusions?' Why not just say it instead of trying to nudge me there?

In post 638, Tywin Lannister wrote:

@mod: would that be helpful if I declare V/LA on the weekend (days I may/may not post a lot) and just post anyways if I can? I don't really wanna get prodded once a week for missing a Saturday or Sunday

.

In post 636, Zekromaster wrote:

In post 631, James3 wrote:

In post 599, SlySly wrote:

In post 589, James3 wrote:he'll claim something important shortly before the day ends in order to try to cause a nolynch.

Way to burst my bubble. I was hoping to surprise everyone.

Claim. Now.

In post 616, Zekromaster wrote:@James3, CommKnight, AnyoneWhoClaimedOrWantsToClaim:

If you are really your role, why do you think claiming D1 is a good idea?

.
@James3: Yes, I know, meta. But either you're bad town or hiding behind meta, no one sane would ever claim TWO DAYS BEFORE HIS FIRST RESULT. Zekromaster would like some more practical and logical answer, as he thinks "meta" isn't the real reason behing that claim.

I always claim day one. You can check my references if you like. I do it because I find it to be a profitable game strategy, as it provokes all sorts of reactions that allow me to get reads on people.

I: "Don't answer with meta!"
James3: [Some more meta plus "it just works!"]

In post 642, Pepchoninga wrote:James stop role fishing please. If you want the claim, help people get on the Sly wagon.

In post 641, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 638, Tywin Lannister wrote:

@mod: would that be helpful if I declare V/LA on the weekend (days I may/may not post a lot) and just post anyways if I can? I don't really wanna get prodded once a week for missing a Saturday or Sunday

.

Same here.

But separately.

In post 631, James3 wrote:Claim. Now.