Mafiascum.net

In post 499, MarioManiac4 wrote:VOTE: DeltaW
i have skimmed the last five or so pages so my vote returns to this

In post 500, Siblings Pet Doggo wrote:VOTE: Delta
MM4 what do you think of Echo?
-Ali

In post 501, Sesq wrote:owo whats this

VOTE: Delta

In post 502, Tenshii wrote:VOTE: Delta

I haven't read yet, I just wanted to vote for the sake of putting 4 consecutive votes on him.

In post 509, Kawso wrote:Have we ruled out the possibility of both Comm & Siblings being Scum? It's unlikely, but if that's the case, then the real cop shouldn't out.

Actually, could it be viable for each of us to hypoclaim cop/seer tomorrow?

In post 554, Sesq wrote:i feel like im stuck right now

and kinda want to lynch comm

but im not sure

In post 618, Almost50 wrote:

In post 615, EchoVision wrote:

In post 420, Almost50 wrote:{MarioManiac4, GameNBurger, EchoVision} Pick one.

Actually, I retract the TR on flubber too. Might as well switch him with Siblings. That's the last 4 votes on you, and flubber now the scummiest of them all.

VOTE: flubber

can i ask why the suspicion on us three and not any others on the wagon?

aside from flubber of course

You mean to ask why I suspected only 50% if the wagon, except I also suspected one third of the other 50%??

In post 620, Almost50 wrote:How much longer are we going to dwell about this Cop/No Cop thing?? Is this the focal point of the whole game?? Like, GET OVER IT!. Let's SCUM HUNT.

My updated lynch pool is: Sesq, Hawk, havingfitz, DeltaW, Balki B, Tenshii

If I had to rank them, I'd say I'm more confident in my scum reads on Sesq & Balki. Pick one of the two to vote and let's form some serious wagons.

In post 474, Siblings Pet Doggo wrote:

In post 473, GameNBurger wrote:

In post 468, Siblings Pet Doggo wrote:Hey Game.
Instead of jumping to conclusions, read my reasoning for why I did that?

And as scum, why would I even back off like that?
-Ali

Mainly Because i read your post and thats such a bullshit move given the multiball setup as Almost50 has pointed out

And i havent played in like 4 years but I seriously doubt meta has changed so drastically that fake claiming as town is all of a sudden an acceptable play in any standard

Meet RadiantCowbells: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... 6#p9104916

That game he was hydraing with Titus.

Scum!Ari fakeclaims a 1-shot BP as scum getting wagoned.
They fake a CC.

The idea is not completely out of possibility.

tbh, I'm not even thinking at all from the viewpoints Almost is bringing up.
-Ali

In post 477, CommKnight wrote:So Ali... now that you owned up to it. Help lynch scum. I was serious, other faction could off you in the night or in the event of my death, you'd be immediately lynched. So unlike you and the other two, I am focused on finding at LEAST 5 others that are scum, at least 2 of those 5 (3 if you're really town) are more than likely in the group that voted for me.

If there's only ONE scum in Balki and Game, I think it's Game. He's showing that he knows enough (not quite much, but enough) to know continuing to push on the cop claim was a bad move.

We also now have to sort Echo, Mario and Flubber. 2/3 more likely than not being scum.

In post 502, Tenshii wrote:VOTE: Delta

I haven't read yet, I just wanted to vote for the sake of putting 4 consecutive votes on him.

In post 625, EchoVision wrote:

In post 499, MarioManiac4 wrote:VOTE: DeltaW
i have skimmed the last five or so pages so my vote returns to this

por que motha fucka

In post 603, Almost50 wrote:

In post 557, Tenshii wrote:Comm is uncc'd. Please shut up and talk about something else.

If Comm isn't cop then real cop should CC now. I'm not going to deal with analyzing your late game claim because you failed at doing a shitty roleswap.

This is also such a scummy post/concept? Why do you think the real Cop should out just for your own amusement? Someone claimed Cop and became the Mafia NK target. I'd say that is GOOD COVER for the real Cop. They are guaranteed to survive at least one night. Whenever Comm flips then you'll know if he is/isn't the Cop, and hence if/when the real Cop claims that has nothing to do with Comm fake claiming (if he is fake claiming).

In post 607, Almost50 wrote:

In post 575, MarioManiac4 wrote:

MM4's conclusive case on why Cop should CC

Town for scum is a good trade. End. Of.
It doesn't matter if you think you're a gr9 player and everyone should sheep you, or if you think that your 50% clears and 50% chance of detecting scum are so valuable that you simply cannot sacrifice yourself. If cop claims here, we get a HUGE advantage. It allows scum to die BEFORE we get our chance to (probably) lynch multiple times d2. In fact we could slaughter a scumteam before d2's dawn. If cop doesn't claim here, scum WILL be treated as conftown, we will probably go and lynch town today, and when you attempt to CC later you will get lynched.

pedit: Actually I wasn't really joking at all

For THIS SETUP, Conf!Town is not AT ALL a god thing. They're a PRIME NK TARGET for at least one scum group, and there is NO TOWN DOCTOR, so treat them as confirmed if you will, but they will flip sooner than later still.

In post 623, Siblings Pet Doggo wrote:MM4, Can we do Echo instead?
His posts are pinging me =(
-Ali

pedit: They don't want the attention?

In post 248, MarioManiac4 wrote:

In post 237, DeltaW wrote:

In post 40, MarioManiac4 wrote:I am so not looking forward to failing to read Balki this game.

In post 77, MarioManiac4 wrote:

In post 75, Balki B wrote: Also, will you be playing the entire game as a condescending asshole? Is it some sort of role play?

In post 88, MarioManiac4 wrote:

In post 85, Siblings Pet Doggo wrote:

In post 14, MarioManiac4 wrote:nah, either vig just shoots whoever or they shoot the common scumreads
telling vig to shoot you p1 is WIFOM and unhelpful

Wowie MM4, look at you.
So helpful.

Thanks I try.

In post 90, MarioManiac4 wrote:VOTE: Kawso

In post 119, MarioManiac4 wrote:
VOTE: DeltaW

So many empty posts, if you want to call my stuff fake, actually put some stuff in the thread of substance, that's why I come daily so there's enough substance to mkae a post about it.

In post 141, MarioManiac4 wrote:"Is not giving reasons for votes the new meta, or would you care to enlighten any of us?"
this really doesn't have anything to do with the general consensus on how scummy people are

Makes you seem more scummy.
VOTE: Mario

Nah this isn't a natural evaluation of my ISO. You're saying "Mario is scummy because there are some posts that do not have content" and calling that me not providing content, but if you evaluated it you would notice I have in fact given content.

In post 502, Tenshii wrote:VOTE: Delta

I haven't read yet, I just wanted to vote for the sake of putting 4 consecutive votes on him.

In post 644, DeltaW wrote:

In post 248, MarioManiac4 wrote:

In post 237, DeltaW wrote:

In post 40, MarioManiac4 wrote:I am so not looking forward to failing to read Balki this game.

In post 77, MarioManiac4 wrote:

In post 75, Balki B wrote: Also, will you be playing the entire game as a condescending asshole? Is it some sort of role play?

In post 88, MarioManiac4 wrote:

In post 85, Siblings Pet Doggo wrote:

In post 14, MarioManiac4 wrote:nah, either vig just shoots whoever or they shoot the common scumreads
telling vig to shoot you p1 is WIFOM and unhelpful

Wowie MM4, look at you.
So helpful.

Thanks I try.

In post 90, MarioManiac4 wrote:VOTE: Kawso

In post 119, MarioManiac4 wrote:
VOTE: DeltaW

So many empty posts, if you want to call my stuff fake, actually put some stuff in the thread of substance, that's why I come daily so there's enough substance to mkae a post about it.

In post 141, MarioManiac4 wrote:"Is not giving reasons for votes the new meta, or would you care to enlighten any of us?"
this really doesn't have anything to do with the general consensus on how scummy people are

Makes you seem more scummy.
VOTE: Mario

Nah this isn't a natural evaluation of my ISO. You're saying "Mario is scummy because there are some posts that do not have content" and calling that me not providing content, but if you evaluated it you would notice I have in fact given content.

I think it' pretty natural given that it makes up half your posts.

In post 648, Kawso wrote:I don't like voting d1