Page 26 of 32

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:56 pm
by Transcend
No

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:57 pm
by Transcend
I wonder why you didn't die n1 :thinking:

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:59 pm
by northsidegal
could you be a bit more specific here? i'd rather not give away more information than necessary.

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:59 pm
by Transcend
You know what i mean lol

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:59 pm
by Lapsa
and I congratulate you being so clever and emphasizing. really soothes my heart and soul

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:00 pm
by Transcend
North is a Mafia bulletproof.

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:01 pm
by Transcend
Let's see if you guys are smart enough to pick up the hints : )

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:01 pm
by Lapsa
pour in role fishing
In post 624, northsidegal wrote:i wouldn't think you'd gambit a fake guilty. gunsmith, right?

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:01 pm
by northsidegal
really, i don't. you shot me night one? i have no clue why i would have lived through that. the obvious thought is that nero guarded me but not only do i find that doubtful, but it would also imply that scum shot him as well. perhaps there's a second protective role?

of course, there's always the explanation that you're just lying, but i really don't believe that here.

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:01 pm
by Transcend
I have to go back to work :(

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:02 pm
by Transcend
Aite I'm not vig but you literally have a gun as you thought i was gs.

So hard claim lady.

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:04 pm
by northsidegal
vigilante. there's more to it but again, i don't think it's beneficial to reveal everything - it'd allows scum to plan their play accordingly.

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:04 pm
by Transcend
And if you claim vig then I'm power lynching the shit out of you as you validated my fake claim.

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:04 pm
by Transcend
No die

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:05 pm
by northsidegal
In post 637, Transcend wrote:And if you claim vig then I'm power lynching the shit out of you as you validated my fake claim.
what? i have no idea what this means.

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:07 pm
by Lapsa
you are on Earth. it's year 2017

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:29 pm
by Lapsa
snap

empathetic is what I meant

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:31 pm
by Lapsa
also - don't care about hints. I'm confbiased

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:48 pm
by Lapsa
In post 624, northsidegal wrote: i don't expect there to be one, i was asking if there was one that you wanted to show.
^ bullshit
In post 599, Lapsa wrote: mix of always oscillating null, slight town/scum lean.
sounds convenient
but I can't help that

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:19 am
by A Simple Plan
Sort of a prod dodge, sort of a "wait, we're claiming now? What?" Sort of thing.

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:03 am
by Flavor Leaf
I have to think. Part of me is doubting North as scum, but part of me thinks like, that’s a wrap, North is fucking scum.

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:54 am
by Lapsa
In post 644, A Simple Plan wrote:Sort of a prod dodge, sort of a "wait, we're claiming now? What?" Sort of thing.
we are mass claiming at the moment

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 11:23 am
by northsidegal
In post 643, Lapsa wrote:
In post 624, northsidegal wrote: i don't expect there to be one, i was asking if there was one that you wanted to show.
^ bullshit
In post 599, Lapsa wrote: mix of always oscillating null, slight town/scum lean.
sounds convenient
but I can't help that
that quote is quite clearly saying that you can't help that your reads sound convenient. even if you can't help that they sound convenient, there might have been something you could point to as evidence - there's no inconsistency there.

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 11:35 am
by Lapsa
In post 647, northsidegal wrote:
In post 643, Lapsa wrote:
In post 624, northsidegal wrote: i don't expect there to be one, i was asking if there was one that you wanted to show.
^ bullshit
In post 599, Lapsa wrote: mix of always oscillating null, slight town/scum lean.
sounds convenient
but I can't help that
that quote is quite clearly saying that you can't help that your reads sound convenient. even if you can't help that they sound convenient, there might have been something you could point to as evidence - there's no inconsistency there.
and you are scum. there is no inconsistency in that

it's this scrutiny of pointless bullshit that gives you away

scum has to fabricate stuff so they do

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 11:37 am
by Lapsa
and judging by your conversation w/ Transcend - you are far from being braindead

so you are all around fake