Mafiascum.net

Awwwww I'm getting warm fuzzies at being bop scumread

In post 624, Enter wrote:I like the vote switching yesterday, I think. Reads kinda like flailing not knowing who to vote which shouldn't be happening as scum. I like temporarily sleeping reck. I think? I like pushing urap2 just in the fact that it's controversial and too scummy to be scum in a way.

The flailing is more often coming from town me than scum me

Pushing controversial reads/stances is more likely to come from scum me than town me Unless I have an already established basis for it, in which case it's more likely to come from town me.

*UNLESS

Actually the flailing is null, nvm

So basically read you as scum. Got it.

What is a BoP scumread

In post 624, Enter wrote:PEdit: you have BoP

That's what I assumed this was

Am I wrong?

In post 630, Ankamius wrote:

In post 624, Enter wrote:PEdit: you have BoP

That's what I assumed this was

Am I wrong?

I think you're wrong. I said you have BoP to say why you'd post like "I'm in my range to be scum or town rn"

But TBH if you could also take BoP as far as whether or not you're scum that would be great. It's not like your stuff is really null, it's all pretty town or pretty scum.

VOTE: NMSA

L-1

hm

can we not fucking do this with lady angel & nim giving us ABSOLUTELY GODDAMN NOTHING TODAY

I posted that because I felt like it tbh

that's really it

I'm not actually taking this day very seriously because I don't think most of it matters

yes im pushing lurkers because this is how lurkers win games and id rather lose 100000x over to someone actually trying and playing the game than let shitbag lurkers skate through and win after doing nothing

there's a good goddamn reason lynch all lurkers was the site meta 10 years ago, and there's a reason im pushing to bring it back (i dont recall which game it was, but it was one where Aristophanes lurked all game and skated by to a win)

In post 450, Enter wrote:

tris

is kinda null, actually. talk about who you'd lynch and why, please? Actually, talk about skitter and your thoughts on Bronson's posts.

Well, so far everything coming from skitter has felt like it's coming from a genuine place. I don't really get the Branson case. I don't see what's scummy about 70.

@Ank Do you still scumread skitter?

In post 599, u r a person 2 wrote:You're not really giving reads. You're just shading me and inexplicably calling nmsa town. What reasons do you have?

VOTE: nmsa

I'm ready to do this tbh. got a decent town bloc and caught scum

You asked for reads, you got them, but then you say that Ank shouldn't have called you scum without voting you? She was doing what you asked for there.

we aren't ever going to get a free chance to lynch lurkers moving forward

d1 is the only possible day where there's time for it bc d2 and onwards everyone will have bigger fish to fry

so please god give us the nim lynch
lady angel is probably getting replaced

VOTE: Lady Angel

I'm convinced

choo choo!

In post 638, xRECKONERx wrote:yes im pushing lurkers because this is how lurkers win games and id rather lose 100000x over to someone actually trying and playing the game than let shitbag lurkers skate through and win after doing nothing

there's a good goddamn reason lynch all lurkers was the site meta 10 years ago, and there's a reason im pushing to bring it back (i dont recall which game it was, but it was one where Aristophanes lurked all game and skated by to a win)

okay, sure.

But NMSA is scum and we're not lynching a lurker over scum today.

yeah pardon me if i dont take your opinion as word of god

In post 643, tris wrote:VOTE: NMSA

this needs rope as soon as humanly fucking possible btw

Why's that?

NMSA looks town enough to me

can we lynch somebody not them

thanks

In post 646, tris wrote:Why's that?

here ill put as much effort into that response as youve put into explaining your reads

anyway so what's up gang