Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 11:45 am
I haven’t said anything about that slot until Quest asked me to vote them into coalition. If otoh, you mean Tim/RC, then you should specify that.
I haven’t said anything about that slot until Quest asked me to vote them into coalition. If otoh, you mean Tim/RC, then you should specify that.
Town!Krazy would make an actual case and give reasons why I should sheep him, not jump on me and accuse me of “scumclaiming” for failing to fall into line, according to him. He wrongly thinks that I’m so terrified of being mislynched again, that I’ve apparently had a lobotomy or something.In post 615, Quest wrote:This is the same person who's currently disagreeing with a coalition.In post 372, Weiss Schnee wrote:Why? If I'm not in the coalition then either town wins without me or I don't have to do anything until like day 3 since we lynch in the coalition first. If I do literally nothing and stay out of the coalition then I can just continue to cruise and then scumhunt if the game isn't won by you all carrying. There's really very little reason to present towniness unless I am really sure I have to be in the coalition to win, and right now I'm not sure of that because half the player list is being replaced.
*shrug*
From this I'm happy with you, potentially Sasha, Blake, potentially Pyrrha. I am not ok with implosionIn post 627, Quest wrote:Raya, you would be doing us all a great favor by voting this coalition: {quest, implosion, sashaddin, blake belladonna, pyrrha nikos}.
I would ignore Krazy's post if I were you; his thoughts are very disconnected and I don't think he believes half of the stuff he's saying. Regardless, you're not being mislynched this game since we're ending the game today.In post 629, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:Town!Krazy would make an actual case and give reasons why I should sheep him, not jump on me and accuse me of “scumclaiming” for failing to fall into line, according to him. He wrongly thinks that I’m so terrified of being mislynched again, that I’ve apparently had a lobotomy or something.In post 615, Quest wrote:This is the same person who's currently disagreeing with a coalition.In post 372, Weiss Schnee wrote:Why? If I'm not in the coalition then either town wins without me or I don't have to do anything until like day 3 since we lynch in the coalition first. If I do literally nothing and stay out of the coalition then I can just continue to cruise and then scumhunt if the game isn't won by you all carrying. There's really very little reason to present towniness unless I am really sure I have to be in the coalition to win, and right now I'm not sure of that because half the player list is being replaced.
*shrug*
In post 630, Raya36 wrote:I don't have enough content from Weiss to make a read yet. I'd like to wait on that read after a response to my question
If we remove Implosion from this coalition and add you, would youIn post 631, Raya36 wrote:From this I'm happy with you, potentially Sasha, Blake, potentially Pyrrha. I am not ok with implosion
In post 636, Raya36 wrote:I really need more from urich before calling him scum
He's done this whole 'hold cards close to chest' thing before in another game I've seen from him, but before it was still pretty clear he was at least trying to do something.In post 639, Raya36 wrote:What makes you say scum from what we have to work with so far?
No deal.In post 644, Raya36 wrote:I'd like some reasoning on implosion first and a chance to look at the other two more closely
In post 573, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:@mod, can you lynch on the same day you vote a coalition and how does this work?