Mafiascum.net

In post 347, Robbnva wrote:yes, Fall looks to not have logged on since the 21st. I am sitting back because I feel like everyone heard from me enough and I like where my vote is at for now. That bs shading vork did just annoyed me and I don't see why town would do that. Plus he isn't providing any content which makes his post hilarious. How can he be waiting for others when he isn't doing anything himself.

PM/Flubber/Havo were low posters day 1 and remain that way today. Anyone who has less posts than the mod can seriously go F themselves. That should never happen. Fall hasn't posted in 5 days and has more posts than those 3.

In post 391, Robbnva wrote:

In post 338, Vorkuta wrote:{}
{Luca}
{skitter, HAvo, Tchill}
{Jigglypuff, soul, Flubber}
{Robb}

Some of these are "policy" reads but I hope that will change as the day goes along and they contribute something AI.

any chance you are going to explain any of these reads or actively do anything to pursue/sort them or are you just going to sit there doing nothing?

In post 417, Robbnva wrote:I think I just get so annoyed with you that I either try to get you lynched or just give up. When we’re on opposite pushes it’s exhausting lol.

So have you read yet? Have any reads?

In post 438, Robbnva wrote:I’ve done more than half the player list including you so da fuck you talkin bout Willis?

In post 464, Robbnva wrote:

In post 460, Vorkuta wrote:Robb has one trick in his book and every other posts comes from his "lets hypertunnel" agenda. I don't know if this lack of nuance is his town play, but I can see it go both ways.

I'm your top scum read and this is why?

In post 465, Robbnva wrote:

In post 462, Luca Blight wrote:I don’t get the lack of interest in a PM lynch. His recent post was ok but overall then isn’t much that makes me feel like he is Town.

I would be willing to compromise on lynching any of the following: Slitter, Tchill, Flavor.

Vorkuta is probably Town due to the lack of action in the game while he’s been main wagon.

I can get behind a pm lynch also but vork just said he has an unexpected v/la so you can't really give him town points for being inactive, assuming he is telling the truth.

This part about PM

"His recent post was ok but overall then isn’t much that makes me feel like he is Town"

could easily be applied to vork, minus the "his recent post was ok" part.

In post 471, Robbnva wrote:i've been keeping the pressure on you so you can contribute something of value, so what you call a one trick pony, I call pressuring a lurker who had a scummy play day one, scummy vote day 1, and isn't doing anything to produce game content to analyze.

the only reason i chose you over the others is you tried to shade me for stating the obvious. Something that i don't think I have seen anyone disagree with. I don't see town motivation for that.

You are most likely scum imo, worse case I am wrong and you are just a useless turd who doesn't care about finding scum. Who doesn't care about playing to their win condition. Either way I don't give a shit anymore.

At least 5 people who haven't contributed anything useful. We have 2/3 scum so that means there are townies out there who are in my opinion, playing against their win condition.

In post 545, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 539, skitter30 wrote: fl is a great invest target imo

In post 546, Robbnva wrote:All right guys and gals. Having surgery in the morning. Won’t be active much tomorrow.

In post 548, Vorkuta wrote:Once again- for like the fifth time, I am unable to HAVE a thought process when all I'm doing is defending from a death tunnel after an unfortunate period of downtime

In post 548, Vorkuta wrote:.....
you know that even azure herself acknowledged that as a reaction test right?

In post 548, Vorkuta wrote:40% yes- robb is still in the game and with 0 ramifications and that's complete bull. 0 scrutiny whatsoever on that slot and everyone's shrugged it off and that's BS

In post 548, Vorkuta wrote:doesn't mean it's not true and I don't feel that way
I pull this exact shit with papa leaf in every game regardless of alignment so idk

In post 548, Vorkuta wrote:ehhhh, no. As scum, I like taking advantage of declining activity/game-state (for some reason there's been quite a bit of that in some of my games ) and score free town-points by pretending to show initiative/stepping-up/leading/contributing
faking it is much easier than actually getting it right

In post 549, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 534, skitter30 wrote:

In post 503, Flubbernugget wrote:Skitter,

If vork as scum can have issues with waning activity, why would they be playing into robb's tunnel so hard while the vork wagon dies down? Seems like a perfect opportunity to lay low

he responds to pressure as scum iirc, when he isn't like ~needed~ he tends to fade into the background

That's what I'm saying though

It doesn't feel like it's needed here

In post 555, PMysterious wrote:Again, like Flavor, Tchill never answered the question I had for him, which is a problem for me. A big problem.

In post 557, Tchill13 wrote:

In post 539, skitter30 wrote:i don't even think i've seen you do this as replacing in either, as either alignment

i'm still happy with my vork vote, i think

fl is a great invest target imo

fl is like 3rd or 4th on invest target viability atm.

In post 571, Vorkuta wrote:Flubber shows reasoning. He's more active than when he previously was in cats (idk if activity is a tell for him or not) but yeah

In post 575, Tchill13 wrote:scum is not gonna loudly tunnel a different person every day phase that is a horrible strategy.

In post 627, Tchill13 wrote:so 4 of us have been weary of vork scum the majority of d2.

flub has done little to nothing. FL replaced into a suspicious slot in a lifeless manner.

prob 2 scum in Vork/FL/Flubb

if 3 scum probably one in havo/skitter/Robbvna (cus im not perfect)

both lists are in order of suspicion.

Vork def needs to be the lynch this day phase given 4 ppl have fos'd him pretty consistently. He flips scum im looking at Havo/flubb.

Vork flips town im looking at FL/Flubb/(if a 3rd) Skitter

In post 630, Tchill13 wrote:my read of you is independent of vork. Youre scum because you havent made an effort to solve hardly at all. most youve done is take vorks side in robb! scum.

scum ML me. Scum ML robb next day phase.

Pretty sure thats whats going on here. Especially since Vork made the comment that Robb is mislynch bait and wont be NK'd by scum.

regardless of my feelings towards vork 3 others believe hes scum also.

Flub youre just scum based on your play. Regardless of vorks alignment.

just like vork is scum based on vorks play. regardless of vorks alignment.

only association ive ssen so far is maybe havo/vork and that i dont believe FL is scum with Vork but thats much weaker than the havo/vork connection.

In post 488, skitter30 wrote:

In post 457, Havo wrote:Vork, Fall and Flub.

I’d like to hear more from Tchill

weren't you just saying that a pool of vork and fall is weak?