Mafiascum.net

waiting for something that actually makes me want to hammer you (im rereading)

the whole time i put you near the scum side of my list was just based on other people's reads

i didn't think it mattered that much since i wasn't going to lynch you

@Vorkuta can i ask you why exactly you voted bailey

Oh well, I mean, at least that wagon on Jamelia didn't go through.

we were lucky i guess

@george before you realized suspicious was clear, why'd you vote them? i thought you were trying to get skitter lynched earlier

btw you're still voting him

I'd rather bite my tongue today and cooperate with a lynch than keep stonewalling and insisting that it's someone that doesn't have a chance of being run up in a day.
So- PoE, deadline, + like only 2"""acceptable""" wagons (+Zenith, and I personally hate returning to RVS wagons) excluding a CFD.
His ISO (short enough to reread ) looks 'meh' due to inactivity (lawl pot calling kettle black ikr).... yeah

Just out of curiosity
@mason buddies- btw, did you guys crumb?

Not sure how to feel about Jamuarnelia mixing me up with Vork.

Tomorrow I'll take {tictac/DDL/skiiter/febuary} for a spin and see how that fares.

Tbh my reads are pretty shot right now. I mean, I've still got town lean on tictac and skitter, but at this point maybe that means I should be voting for one of them..

In post 628, january wrote:why'd you vote them? i thought you were trying to get skitter lynched earlier

Because as Vork mentioned, I should have brought that up tomorrow, and he was right, it bit me in the ass later. It was either him/Zenith.

UNVOTE: Suspicious

Zenith is out for me now, because I'm still surprised he's not holding a grudge from my constant push earlier.

What push? x,X

As for why I voted Suspicious, because it's one of the wagons I should have joined, Out of jam/jan/Sus I would choose sus to lynch.

But from all of your thoughts, he's apparently pretty much confirmed. So there's no point.

mmk

george you're one vote away from getting hammered but you're not even effort-ing to save yourself. did u just give up or is there someone else you want lynched

In post 636, GeorgeBailey wrote:But from all of your thoughts

let me just
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Mason
here you go

Jam & sus have claimed mason.
Sure they could be lying but
-there isn't a counter claim (HEY IM ANOTHER PR) which SHOULD be done because we literally win the game if the 2 are lying
-one of them will be killed tonight

So it's not really just our thoughts, so much as "game mechanics"

kinda feel like a different vote but i don't think it's possible with the time left and ppl already voting

@Jan Hold on one moment, i'm writing a little bit up. We also have 7 hours left, which is a good chunk of time for DDL,Skitter and Jam to chime in.

Also @Vork, I meant thoughts as the general consensus. But yeah you're right, I overlooked how easily they're confirmed. Because of the mechanics.

UNVOTE:
Breathing room

Alright, well, my next choice after everyone would probably be Vork.

Vork held on and voted Jan 61
When asked why

In post 190, Vorkuta wrote:-I can't be bothered to comb through your ISO, find a quote which pings you as vulnerable for me, and proceed to have a back-and-forth. Suffice to say your opening (hi, I'm new, please be nice) and the next few afterwards left that impression on me and that's it.

And held on for the sake of pressure until 573.

Then, to go from:

In post 283, Vorkuta wrote:gut/tone- his walls feel the most genuine in terms of "getting to the bottom of things" while others have more of a "defensive/agenda-driven" approach
also he ticked off things in my "things to look for in town" checklists

To

In post 573, Vorkuta wrote:*sighs*
I can buy it knowing the mason pair
VOTE: bailey

Is a pretty sharp contrast. It sounds like Vork wants to lynch for the sake of lynching, instead of lynching for scum. This was before I made the vote on Suspicious.

Again:

In post 629, Vorkuta wrote:I'd rather bite my tongue today and cooperate with a lynch than keep stonewalling and insisting that it's someone that doesn't have a chance of being run up in a day.

Welp, that's my only defense. Plus I was trying to NOT get the PRs from voted out, but that was before they claimed so idk how much merit that holds. I'd rather have Skitter voted out, but that ain't happening. I'll be off for the next few hours so whatever happens, will happen. I'll try to reply mobile if this sparks anything.

VOTE: Vork

k
great
that's cool

Now do me a favor and kindly explain how that comes from scum!vork and not town!vork?
Where's the "scum intent" behind my actions?

Also reVOTE: bailey

Yeah

My push on december AT LEAST has the distinction of how I think she would behave if she were town in that scenario, and why her overly-concerned nature comes from scum and not town.

I'm pretty sure this is just a kneejerk OMGUS vote + "how could you betray me like this even though 300 posts ago you thought I was town" + "desperate attempt at literally anything a second before the deadline".
I don't want to say "classic scum flailing", but pretty damn close to it.


Also if I wanted to vote for the sake of lynching, I'd go for DDL who's been quite absent.
Maybe skitter considering she's V/LA, or Zenith because it would be so simple and I'd get literally no blowback.

Hi i skimmed and have a busy night

UNVOTE:

Vork does town!you ever consider lynching me day1 or ...

In post 644, Vorkuta wrote:Also if I wanted to vote for the sake of lynching, I'd go for DDL who's been quite absent.
Maybe skitter considering she's V/LA, or Zenith because it would be so simple and I'd get literally no blowback.

Like this doesnt fit with the last like three games i've played with you

Never mind i misread that post cuz skimming

Anyone know what the current VC is?

voting georgebailey: 4
suspicious
tictac
vorkuta
drdolittle (has been offline from before pr claims)

zenith, skitter, january, jamelia(?) not voting

bailey voting vork