Mafiascum.net

Has to do with my G6 read, which is my strongest read in the game right now and I do not want to talk about it in public until I have litmus'd it with someone.

L2:

L5 is talking about G5 pairing with L2 as a town powerhouse, which is from my understanding based off her view of the G5 that was seemingly without realizing what may be of the G5 to come.

G5 being turbotown is definitely a hot take.

In post 625, Gentleman 2 wrote:Has to do with my G6 read, which is my strongest read in the game right now and I do not want to talk about it in public until I have litmus'd it with someone.

Is it that I'm actually scum or something?

In post 622, Gentleman 2 wrote:

In post 620, Lady 7 wrote:Me as well what?

As in I left it off the post before it.

I don’t follow.

Sorry if it’s obvious. I’m nearly asleep.

In post 623, Gentleman 6 wrote:I guess I'll be honest.

Truth is I'm not entirely sure that she's town and I think that if she is I'll be 100% sure to see it In a hood and if she's not I think I'll see it as well.

Interesting,

My reasoning for L9 as my top choice is because my plan currently is to get someone who, ignoring alignment, can deal with my shit and be objective in the face of wack theories.

Then presenting a bunch of shit before NK time, and effectively giving town a body of work to work from for the final phase of the game.

To that end, it doesn't matter if I match with scum because they aren't getting to end game, so town forced 1 for 1 in a 3/14 game is super strong.And if they are town, it is possibly one of the best town possible for me and the play-style I see for myself in the near future.

Eh if I'm outing that I might as well out both of my reads.
I think that L7-L9 associatives look extremely likely to be SvS.
I think that L7 independently is the scummiest slot in the game right now.

Given that these are very unpopular reads my goal was to simply let town do what they want for a while and if we don't end up flipping scum to leave the dance with 9 and an explanation why later.

In post 627, Lady 4 wrote:G5 being turbotown is definitely a hot take.

amen

In post 628, Gentleman 6 wrote:

In post 625, Gentleman 2 wrote:Has to do with my G6 read, which is my strongest read in the game right now and I do not want to talk about it in public until I have litmus'd it with someone.

Is it that I'm actually scum or something?

I need a prodigy for after I die.

And that's also why I was opposed to you pairing with 9.

Figured I'd just get shot if I paired with a universally townread player and no one would really question why the IC didn't die.

In post 629, Lady 7 wrote:

In post 622, Gentleman 2 wrote:

In post 620, Lady 7 wrote:Me as well what?

As in I left it off the post before it.

I don’t follow.

Sorry if it’s obvious. I’m nearly asleep.

My post was wordwordwords.

It should have been wordswordswords and sorry L7 for calling someone a VI.

In post 634, Gentleman 6 wrote:And that's also why I was opposed to you pairing with 9.

Figured I'd just get shot if I paired with a universally townread player and no one would really question why the IC didn't die.

EVERYONE will question if I didn't die.

Like I think G1 is probably town.
You're town.
G3 maybe still scum but I don't really think so.
Fire (G4) was town.
G5 uncertain
G6 me!
G7 town.
G8 hasn't posted enough.

That's a lot of gentleman townreads that I got so I kinda think that pairings aren't all that big of a deal because scum are the womenfolk.

If I'm right, which I may not be.

In post 636, Gentleman 2 wrote:

In post 634, Gentleman 6 wrote:And that's also why I was opposed to you pairing with 9.

Figured I'd just get shot if I paired with a universally townread player and no one would really question why the IC didn't die.

EVERYONE will question if I didn't die.

I respectfully disagree

I think that as an example if I died with L9

Not a single person would make a single post asking why that kill happened over your pairing.

In post 623, Gentleman 6 wrote:I guess I'll be honest.

Truth is I'm not entirely sure that she's town and I think that if she is I'll be 100% sure to see it In a hood and if she's not I think I'll see it as well.

Sensible.

In post 626, Lady 7 wrote:L2:

L5 is talking about G5 pairing with L2 as a town powerhouse, which is from my understanding based off her view of the G5 that was seemingly without realizing what may be of the G5 to come.

Still not following I guess? Yeah G5 hasn't done so much that I would confidently predict him as a likely component of a strong powerful T/T pair late game, it's weird that L5 said basically that ... but I wouldn't go from there to a strong feeling that L5 and G5 cannot have the same alignment?

Pedit: Yeah that's a hella spicy take (specifically L7/L9 SvS), G6, but if you think that I might as well take a look.

In post 631, Gentleman 6 wrote:Eh if I'm outing that I might as well out both of my reads.
I think that L7-L9 associatives look extremely likely to be SvS.
I think that L7 independently is the scummiest slot in the game right now.

Given that these are very unpopular reads my goal was to simply let town do what they want for a while and if we don't end up flipping scum to leave the dance with 9 and an explanation why later.

You’d be losing your earlier bet if that’s where you were going.

I don’t think I’ve ever been considered the scummiest slot in a game before. Maybe I lost my town mojo

It'd be a fucking dumb gambit in this game bc look at the numbers. Scum's power in the game hinges on their ability to manipulate their partner. Can't take me to endgame can they.

Like I either get someone to be a town powerhouse with that can be posthumously followed, or I get a 1 for 1. It's win win for town. so I couldn't care less if I match with scum, especially if they are likely to be a strong one.

In post 639, Lady 2 wrote:

In post 623, Gentleman 6 wrote:I guess I'll be honest.

Truth is I'm not entirely sure that she's town and I think that if she is I'll be 100% sure to see it In a hood and if she's not I think I'll see it as well.

Sensible.

In post 626, Lady 7 wrote:L2:

L5 is talking about G5 pairing with L2 as a town powerhouse, which is from my understanding based off her view of the G5 that was seemingly without realizing what may be of the G5 to come.

Still not following I guess? Yeah G5 hasn't done so much that I would confidently predict him as a likely component of a strong powerful T/T pair late game, it's weird that L5 said basically that ... but I wouldn't go from there to a strong feeling that L5 and G5 cannot have the same alignment?

Pedit: Yeah that's a hella spicy take (specifically L7/L9 SvS), G6, but if you think that I might as well take a look.

G5 mainslipped and is getting replaced. I think L5 would be aware of that if she shared a scum at with him.

I wasn't actually that sure of it. Mostly planned to read 9 in hood and if she was town I was just gonna vote her scumreads and not much else.

Like my reads have honestly been a roller coaster this game.

In post 642, Lady 7 wrote:

In post 639, Lady 2 wrote:

In post 623, Gentleman 6 wrote:I guess I'll be honest.

Truth is I'm not entirely sure that she's town and I think that if she is I'll be 100% sure to see it In a hood and if she's not I think I'll see it as well.

Sensible.

In post 626, Lady 7 wrote:L2:

L5 is talking about G5 pairing with L2 as a town powerhouse, which is from my understanding based off her view of the G5 that was seemingly without realizing what may be of the G5 to come.

Still not following I guess? Yeah G5 hasn't done so much that I would confidently predict him as a likely component of a strong powerful T/T pair late game, it's weird that L5 said basically that ... but I wouldn't go from there to a strong feeling that L5 and G5 cannot have the same alignment?

Pedit: Yeah that's a hella spicy take (specifically L7/L9 SvS), G6, but if you think that I might as well take a look.

G5 mainslipped and is getting replaced. I think L5 would be aware of that if she shared a scum at with him.

You're ruling out TvT though?

If I’m the scummiest slot in the game how come you’ve neither been pushing me or answering my questions. You certainly weren’t tightlipped about your l4 epread and push.

In post 645, Lady 2 wrote:

In post 642, Lady 7 wrote:

In post 639, Lady 2 wrote:

In post 623, Gentleman 6 wrote:I guess I'll be honest.

Truth is I'm not entirely sure that she's town and I think that if she is I'll be 100% sure to see it In a hood and if she's not I think I'll see it as well.

Sensible.

In post 626, Lady 7 wrote:L2:

L5 is talking about G5 pairing with L2 as a town powerhouse, which is from my understanding based off her view of the G5 that was seemingly without realizing what may be of the G5 to come.

Still not following I guess? Yeah G5 hasn't done so much that I would confidently predict him as a likely component of a strong powerful T/T pair late game, it's weird that L5 said basically that ... but I wouldn't go from there to a strong feeling that L5 and G5 cannot have the same alignment?

Pedit: Yeah that's a hella spicy take (specifically L7/L9 SvS), G6, but if you think that I might as well take a look.

G5 mainslipped and is getting replaced. I think L5 would be aware of that if she shared a scum at with him.

You're ruling out TvT though?

No?

Because I was mulling over pairing with 9, having you pair with 2, and seeing if some totally random slot got killed.

If we get to 5 pairs (post NK) and there are no scum flipped. I still suicide. and we go to 4 pairs. Which is 5/3

And then town start taking scrutiny in their partners and start suiciding. I still get net positive I feel.