Page 26 of 115

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:07 pm
by Wimpy
In post 616, alimdia wrote:Wimpy, so you think Datisi and Mena are a scum team or not?

If you only think Mena is scum, well theres another scum, so can you guys stop tunneling on each other and get more non {datisi, mena, wimpy} interactions out there?

Pedit: dang ninjaed by Luca
Logically I can’t really see how either of them are town. Menal pushes a lie and datisi just tag teams it.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:08 pm
by Wimpy
In post 620, Luca Blight wrote:The whole '
I've done nothing to warrant a scumread on me
' line is the very essence of why I'm currently scumreading you.

You don't necessarily need concrete reasons to scumread or vote someone - that is a myth. The whole game for scum is to not do scummy things, therefore it's usually what they're not doing that you need to pick up on.

You're seeming like scum who feel they've been caught unfairly/by poor reasoning.
So you have an illogical reason to scum read me because I have literally not done anything to warrant a scum read.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:11 pm
by Alduskkel
So your read on the game is that both scum decided to draw attention to themselves by filling up the game in a 20+ page back and forth with you? If you're town then you're tunneling hard.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:14 pm
by Luca Blight
In post 626, Wimpy wrote:
In post 620, Luca Blight wrote:The whole '
I've done nothing to warrant a scumread on me
' line is the very essence of why I'm currently scumreading you.

You don't necessarily need concrete reasons to scumread or vote someone - that is a myth. The whole game for scum is to not do scummy things, therefore it's usually what they're not doing that you need to pick up on.

You're seeming like scum who feel they've been caught unfairly/by poor reasoning.
So you have an illogical reason to scum read me because I have literally not done anything to warrant a scum read.
I disagree.

Can you point out where Menalque lied, please?

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:14 pm
by alimdia
In post 619, Wimpy wrote:
In post 586, alimdia wrote:I'm voting for this guy just because of this....

VOTE: emps
Why are you not voting the player who lied and has clogged the game up pushing that lie?
Because both of you clogged up the game. And I have lost track of the actual case.
In post 622, Luca Blight wrote:
In post 619, Wimpy wrote:
In post 586, alimdia wrote:I'm voting for this guy just because of this....

VOTE: emps
Why are you not voting the player who lied and has clogged the game up pushing that lie?
The thread is becoming so clogged full of spam I'm losing track of what the exact arguments are.

What was the lie that Menalque has been pushing?
Yes Wimpy can you make 1 single post, with links instead of quotes if it's gonna be big, detailing the parts where Mena pushes the lie.
Also helps if you include the parts where Mena says he didn't lie. I vaguely remembering reading that when I skimmed through the thread.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:16 pm
by Wimpy
In post 622, Luca Blight wrote:What was the lie that Menalque has been pushing?
There is a spoiler with a bunch of them. I don’t want to misspeak and be accused of lying or misrepping so I’ll find it and quote it tomorrow

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:16 pm
by Wimpy
In post 629, alimdia wrote:Yes Wimpy can you make 1 single post, with links instead of quotes if it's gonna be big, detailing the parts where Mena pushes the lie.
Also helps if you include the parts where Mena says he didn't lie. I vaguely remembering reading that when I skimmed through the thread.
Made a spoiler of at least 6/7 lies. It’s in my iso

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:17 pm
by emps
look, the way youve dragged this whole "lie" that mena told along isnt helping town at all. i dont think any of us even know wtf this "lie" that mena told was. youve just clogged the entire thread up, confusing everyone.

if you really think being anti-town means that ur scum, you should be self voting. VOTE: wimpy

pedit : honesty i agree wuth alimidia. i have lost track of why you guys are actually scumreading and voting each other. all i see is some technicalities and like arguing over what people have actually said.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:18 pm
by Datisi
Good morning sunshines

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:19 pm
by Datisi
In post 620, Luca Blight wrote:The whole '
I've done nothing to warrant a scumread on me
' line is the very essence of why I'm currently scumreading you.

You don't necessarily need concrete reasons to scumread or vote someone - that is a myth. The whole game for scum is to not do scummy things, therefore it's usually what they're not doing that you need to pick up on.

You're seeming like scum who feel they've been caught unfairly/by poor reasoning.
Jesus christ someome fuckin gets it thank you Luca

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:19 pm
by Datisi
I am very sad to see my ScumbuddyTM is not here yet. I bet he's still asleep. :(

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:23 pm
by Luca Blight
I find it interesting how Wimpy is spending a lot of time talking about how Menalque lied but seems reluctant to go into details about what the lie actually was. If you're genuinely trying to convince people of your case, then you ought to be doing more of the latter and less of the former. It feels like you're just creating noise for the sake of it.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:24 pm
by Datisi
In post 600, alimdia wrote:Spamposting when catching up was the reason, not just spamposting live discussion.

Did you ever address my hammer point? Where you could have hammered someone by voting whilst still catching up
Also I agree emps here could've made a disaster by accidentally hammering but
For the love of god

Stop with the policy votes

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:26 pm
by Datisi
Here are the """lies""" chief
In post 429, Wimpy wrote:Menal has straight up lied many times. Probably in a way to twist my words. I never said or implied the reason for my Datsi vote was because i thought she was scum. Me thinking she was possible scum came in post 67 but that was because additional things were posted that i didn't care for.

Spoiler:
In post 174, Menalque wrote:You claimed you voted datisi because you thought she was scum
In post 173, Menalque wrote:You clearly implied that you thought she was scum
In post 174, Menalque wrote:Now you’re claiming that you just voted her because she was scummy but that you never really believed she was scum
In post 182, Menalque wrote:I’ve already shown that you claimed earlier that you considered datisi scum at the time of this vote
In post 182, Menalque wrote:So trying to say that you didn’t consider datisi scum when you called her probably scum and implied that you were actually thinking she was scum in the answer to one of my questions goes in contrast to your later claim that you didn’t think she was scum but just that she had done scummy things.


I know I can definitely find more lies but I don't really need to. Part of me wonders if he originally misunderstood what i said, but I would think after i corrected him many times he would have gone back and actually read what i said. I never ever ever ever ever ever ever
ever
said I voted datisi because I thought she was scum and menal pushing that point is deceitful and scummy.
[/quote]

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:27 pm
by Wimpy
In post 174, Menalque wrote:You claimed you voted datisi because you thought she was scum

Now you’re claiming that you just voted her because she was scummy but that you never really believed she was scum
This is basically the narrative menal has pushed the entire game. This is a complete lie.

I never claimed I voted datisi cause I thought she was scum and I’ve proven this is false.

The 2nd line is menal implying I changed my story, however the reason I voted dat was because she was scummy.

The last part is tricky wording on his part. I never said that I didn’t believe she was scum. I’m even on record saying I think she was possibly scum. And probably scum.

This is essentially what he pushes all game.

He also took two factual statements by me and said I had to choose which one was true when they both were.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:29 pm
by Wimpy
In post 632, emps wrote:look, the way youve dragged this whole "lie" that mena told along isnt helping town at all. i dont think any of us even know wtf this "lie" that mena told was. youve just clogged the entire thread up, confusing everyone.

if you really think being anti-town means that ur scum, you should be self voting. VOTE: wimpy

pedit : honesty i agree wuth alimidia. i have lost track of why you guys are actually scumreading and voting each other. all i see is some technicalities and like arguing over what people have actually said.
Man this is so lazy. Menal lies and you can’t even bother to verify it? You instead side with him?

Please lynch me. Town has proven they don’t want to win so I’ll happily be the first casualty

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:29 pm
by Datisi
In post 325, Wimpy wrote:
In post 322, Datisi wrote:"there's not enough evidence to suggest anyone was scum [on page 2]" implies you cannot have a serious vote on page 2

You were also saying your page 2 vote was serious

Sorry chief the math checks out
that is where you are wrong though. You can place a serious vote and not think somebody is scum. Happens all the time. Used to happen when I played here, I am pretty sure it happens now especially since i did it...
I mean you keep pushing bullshit about "having evidence" vs "thinking someome is scum" vs "thinking someone is scummy" but like

Bruh

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:30 pm
by Wimpy
Since nobody wants to play the game. I’m done playing also.

Please lynch menal tomorrow after I flip town.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:31 pm
by Datisi
In post 640, Wimpy wrote:Please lynch me.
You heard the lad friends

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:31 pm
by Wimpy
In post 641, Datisi wrote:I mean you keep pushing bullshit about "having evidence" vs "thinking someome is scum" vs "thinking someone is scummy" but like

Bruh
He accused me of saying I voted you because I thought you were scum.

Did I say that? No

That’s the narrative he’s pushed. It’s a lie

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:32 pm
by Luca Blight
Ok, I don't really agree with the argument of either side here - they are both a little on the pedantic side, but what I think is more important it the result of these arguments.

Menalque has been relentlessly pushing his scumread in a way which he might not have had the cause to do so early on as scum, and has done so in a way which reads as genuinely frustrated and believing in his read.

Wimpy on the other hand reads like caught scum who are desperately trying to wriggle free, and then get so far entrenched that they feel they have to commit to their counter-vote. I don't believe Wimpy's confidence in his scumread/s as much as I believe Menalque's.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:34 pm
by Datisi
In post 644, Wimpy wrote:
In post 641, Datisi wrote:I mean you keep pushing bullshit about "having evidence" vs "thinking someome is scum" vs "thinking someone is scummy" but like

Bruh
He accused me of saying I voted you because I thought you were scum.

Did I say that? No

That’s the narrative he’s pushed. It’s a lie
That's not what I'm talking about

I'm taking about our pg 14 discussion

But ok

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:36 pm
by Wimpy
Page 14 definitely relates to that post. That post I made is basically the entire push from menal. It’s a lie but nobody , like actually nobody cares he’s lied.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:37 pm
by Wimpy
There is nothing that relevant on page 14.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:37 pm
by Luca Blight
I'm still open to giving Wimpy another chance if he can bring himself to stop tunneling and start sorting the rest of the player list.

Right now he doesn't seem capable of this, unfortunately.