Mafiascum.net

In post 615, skitter30 wrote:problems with 469:

- omgus
- overeplain-y wrt why they dislike the unvote (which i think is rather townie)
- says they think naerys had been coached - i'm p sure i asked by who because i'm not sure i see that happening
- shades naerys for being vla

idk if this is inherently scummy but it baffles me why you think that post was townie

In post 621, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 620, skitter30 wrote:

In post 615, skitter30 wrote:idk if this is inherently scummy but it baffles me why you think that post was townie

why was that post townie?

Because I think the post shows Bugspray trying to grapple with things that have happened in the game. I initially thought Bugspray was scummy for this stream of conscious oversharing playstyle they have, but I think that’s just a playstyle habit, not an alignment habit.

For example, Bugspray reminds me of TrueSoulEnergy. Read Masquerade dance player “Lady 5” before the slot was forced replaced. In that game, TrueSoulEnergy overshared and had a stream of conscious playstyle. TrueSoulEnergy also had a lot of quasi conspiracy theories. From afar, Bugspray’s play in this game is very similar to TrueSoulEnergy in that game.

After reading Bugspray with that frame of reference, I think finally they are town.

In post 582, Karnage wrote:are you ignoring this last sentence for any particular reason? you shouldn't be since its whats reflected in my opening post

In post 632, Non lmh wrote:I've been reading games nonstop for some hours now, I hope I'm learning bit I guess time will tell

In post 635, skitter30 wrote:that's not really how i've been approaching this game or you so why do you think that?

@ non imh do you have any thoughts on recent proceedings?

In post 634, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 632, Non lmh wrote:I've been reading games nonstop for some hours now, I hope I'm learning bit I guess time will tell

Have you been reading this game? I found the best way to learn was to directly involve myself in the game.

In post 635, skitter30 wrote:that's not really how i've been approaching this game or you so why do you think that?

@ non imh do you have any thoughts on recent proceedings?

In post 637, skitter30 wrote:i think i garbled that post

basically what i'm trying to get at is: why do i don't genuinely want to talk with you to try to solve the game?

In post 638, Non lmh wrote:

In post 634, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 632, Non lmh wrote:I've been reading games nonstop for some hours now, I hope I'm learning bit I guess time will tell

Have you been reading this game? I found the best way to learn was to directly involve myself in the game.

not as I should have, probably
I keep going back and forth and comparing behavior and interactions

In post 639, Non lmh wrote:

In post 635, skitter30 wrote:that's not really how i've been approaching this game or you so why do you think that?

@ non imh do you have any thoughts on recent proceedings?

yeah? but Im not confident or clever enough to attack on what boils down to meta impressions

In post 640, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 637, skitter30 wrote:i think i garbled that post

basically what i'm trying to get at is: why do i don't genuinely want to talk with you to try to solve the game?

I am not sure the exact reason. Scum motivation could be to protect yourself and your buddy by not giving content that could be associative. It could also be a me thing, but you don’t seem like that type of player.

In post 642, RadiantCowbells wrote:I want a friend this game

In post 644, skitter30 wrote:I guess my question is less why you think scum!me would do that, and more where you think i'm doing that

In post 646, RadiantCowbells wrote:You