Page 26 of 48

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:33 pm
by Detective Pikachu
Like, I say I have a guilty on you, and like a page later comment on RQS, and the RQS is the only thing you focus on, ignoring *when* I start scumreading you which, if you were putting in more than a surface level of analysis into this game, would also have told you *why* I was scumreading you

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:33 pm
by Luca Blight
I’m not continuing this right now as I said, but 84 was (fmpov) clearly a joke.

You didn’t expect me to believe you were serious, did you?

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:34 pm
by Detective Pikachu
VOTE: Natsu

Now Luca will refuse to vote here

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:35 pm
by Detective Pikachu
In post 626, Luca Blight wrote:I’m not continuing this right now as I said, but 84 was (fmpov) clearly a joke.

You didn’t expect me to believe you were serious, did you?
no, but I EXPECTED YOU TO ENGAGE THE THREAD

how the fuck is that not clear? as I said, I felt like you weren't being social -- i.e., I make a joke about your posts, and you just totally ignore me, it makes me feel like you DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT THE GAME which can make me wonder if you're scum

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:37 pm
by Detective Pikachu
I feel like you probably at this point actually understand my problem with your slot and your play, and you probably at some point have realized that my push on you was entirely warranted, but now you've realized that your initial posts in response make you look like a complete ass so you're just unwilling to let it go

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:39 pm
by Luca Blight
That’s a huge assumption.

I don’t reply to Pikachu’s joke, therefore I don’t give a shit about the game.

How fucking arrogant are you?

I did engage the thread as you quoted, but I tend to let things unravel a bit before I get more involved. Does that mean I must be Town? No, but it’s an explanation for why It’s NAI for me.

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:40 pm
by Detective Pikachu
Yeah. Maybe that's why I invited you to catch up before continuing the conversation.

Instead you decided you didn't like my answers and OMGUS'd me in the laziest possible manner

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:42 pm
by Luca Blight
Yeah, sure.

Let’s continue this Tuesday.

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:43 pm
by Detective Pikachu
In post 248, Detective Pikachu wrote::3

It's g luca you're not getting hammered rn come back in a few and show me your solves
In post 251, Detective Pikachu wrote:It's hard to articulate

Hit me with a reads list when you feel more caught up and organized
You keep insisting it's NAI for you.

OK, if it's NAI for you, why is my reaction here unreasonable?

I ask you to catch up. It was an activity push, and a warranted one since, as you keep saying, you don't do much early game

So if it is NAI
a) why should I stop pushing you until you are sortable
b) why am I scum for pushing you when you yourself admit it is not town-indicative?

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:44 pm
by Luca Blight
In post 632, Luca Blight wrote:Yeah, sure.

Let’s continue this Tuesday.

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:45 pm
by Detective Pikachu
In post 252, Luca Blight wrote:This is what I mean by ‘forced’ - your read on me feels entirely rushed and fabricated.

You say I’m scum for not answering RQS - I ask why is it scummy, you said because scum sometimes pick fights. I ask ‘was I picking a fight by not answering them’ you’re like ‘not really, but you’re scummy for no socializing and not laid back’.

So you’re moving the goalposts, can’t explain what you even mean by socializing in this context, and SR me for not being laid back, which is normal for someone who is being attacked?
"forced" -- but admits that my observation activity is low is true

"RQS" -- something I don't care about and haven't mentioned except for one off-hand joke but then takes this to be "moving the goal posts"

and then from here insists I'm "misrepping" when TWO of your three main points in your push against me are due to YOU misunderstanding what is going on in the thread?

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:45 pm
by Detective Pikachu
Or you could just give an actual read of Natsu

Do you actually at this point still think I'm scummier than him?

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:48 pm
by Luca Blight
Drop it, Pikachu.

I SR Natsu, he is currently my second choice for the lynch. I will eventually ISO everyone again, so my vote will remain where it is until then.

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:48 pm
by Detective Pikachu
And to be clear, your trajectory this game is:
-Don't participate
-Excuse yourself for not participating
-OMGUS people pushing you for not participating
-Misread the thread
-Accuse people of misrepping you when you're too lazy to figure out why they are pushing you
-Deliberately escalate the situation by deliberately misrepping the position of the people pushing you
-Complain about hypocrisy and ego

Cool, thanks for playing, real team player there buddy

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:50 pm
by Detective Pikachu
In post 637, Luca Blight wrote:Drop it, Pikachu.
Sorry you want to dish criticism but you can't take it?

You could apologize for deliberately misrepping me and escalating the hostility of the game for as far as I can tell no comprehensible reason

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:50 pm
by Luca Blight
Yes, I am terrible and Pikachu is brilliant. If that’s what makes you happy.

Now please stop going on as I’m not going to continue this until I’m back from V/LA, as I’ve said.

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:51 pm
by Detective Pikachu
In post 600, Luca Blight wrote:Remember when you slated Natsu for being condescending?

I’m sorry but blatant hypocrisy drives me nuts.
In post 640, Luca Blight wrote:Yes, I am terrible and Pikachu is brilliant. If that’s what makes you happy.

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:51 pm
by Luca Blight
In post 639, Detective Pikachu wrote:
In post 637, Luca Blight wrote:Drop it, Pikachu.
Sorry you want to dish criticism but you can't take it?

You could apologize for deliberately misrepping me and escalating the hostility of the game for as far as I can tell no comprehensible reason
I apologize for it. It would be nice if you could do the same.

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 2:52 pm
by Detective Pikachu
I apologize for not being clearer in my reasoning, but to be clear, I did not ever intentionally misrep you and can't apologize for just playing the game normally.

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 4:37 pm
by IMASPY
In post 406, Detective Pikachu wrote:Pikachu: "Why is Luca posting everywhere on site except here? Why doesn't he care about this game?"

Luca: "WHY ARE YOU SCUMREADING ME FOR NOT ANSWERING RQS QUESTIONS????????"

Pikachu: "Actually I just don't really see you interacting here, but if you've been busy then I'm curious about your solve."

Luca: "YOU'RE MISREPPING ME! YOU SHOULD TOWNREAD ME FOR NOT GIVING A SHIT ABOUT THIS GAME!!!!"

Fuck off

If you're town you're never endgame material for me at this point so what's the difference
I'm definitely not caught up on today's post but the first one I seen was dp saying theybv havent misrepresented luca.

The post I quoted jumped into my mind when i seen that.

What would be his be categorized as to everyone?

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 4:39 pm
by Detective Pikachu
do you believe that was an attempt at a realistic representation of what Luca literally said or my subjective interpretation of his argument?

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 5:20 pm
by 72offsuit
In post 644, IMASPY wrote:
In post 406, Detective Pikachu wrote:Pikachu: "Why is Luca posting everywhere on site except here? Why doesn't he care about this game?"

Luca: "WHY ARE YOU SCUMREADING ME FOR NOT ANSWERING RQS QUESTIONS????????"

Pikachu: "Actually I just don't really see you interacting here, but if you've been busy then I'm curious about your solve."

Luca: "YOU'RE MISREPPING ME! YOU SHOULD TOWNREAD ME FOR NOT GIVING A SHIT ABOUT THIS GAME!!!!"

Fuck off

If you're town you're never endgame material for me at this point so what's the difference
I'm definitely not caught up on today's post but the first one I seen was dp saying theybv havent misrepresented luca.

The post I quoted jumped into my mind when i seen that.

What would be his be categorized as to everyone?
To be honest, have totally ignored this pissing contest between the two. It just made my interest in this game like 50 percent to what it was earlier on.

All im taking from their discourse is they are not on the same team.

Im not going to waste another millisecond trting to figure out alignment from it.

If you want to SR me for that, be my guest.

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 5:31 pm
by 72offsuit
@ IMASPY - I would like clarification regarding your link between Natsu and Hectic as scum team. I SR natsu, but not hectic atm.
Ive reread and get why you SR natsu, but not y y SR hectic, nor a libk between them. Can you clarify it for me?

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 6:08 pm
by Hectic
You're the best, 72offsuit.

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 8:38 pm
by Luca Blight
In post 645, Detective Pikachu wrote:do you believe that was an attempt at a realistic representation of what Luca literally said or my subjective interpretation of his argument?
When you present an incorrect and unfounded interpretation of what I’ve said and portray it as the truth, then it is by definition a misrep - you’re making out I said something that I didn’t.

By the same logic my post wasn’t a misrep either. For example, you said I’d only committed to a TR on two players, so my interpretation of that could be ‘if you don’t TR most of the players in the game then you’re scum’.

I’m doing the same as what you did - making a huge assumption as to further meanings behind what you said and presenting it as though you’d actually said the assumed meanings.