Mafiascum.net

Also, is the fact the Hectic slot had two completely opposite reads on me and was puzzled when they contradicted... town or mafia indicative? I think it might be town indicative.

Ha that’s what you get for prodding me I took your page top.

VOTE: Compath

YOLO

@Slaxx what was it you were waiting on for your Luca read before?

Clidd’s reaction to me not giving my read on him. I wanted that situation fully fleshed out and to see where he landed.

Before that I just didn’t have a read on Luca. There were things I liked and things I didn’t but nothing was as substantial as defusing the 1v1.

is compath scum? hm

VOTE: Iconeum

This is the way to go.

I intentionally left my Ico analysis short because I needed to reevaluate. I've reevaluated and did a meta dive. This is scum Ico. I'll go into more details when I'm on a computer, but in the meantime all town comrades feel free to join me, blindly or boldly.

Officer "Officer" Officer checking in for a hard day of work.

In post 609, Iconeum wrote:VOTE: DDL

The Assistant Horse Trainer would like to know why Wyvern Iconeum decided to move here. Additionally, whether he had a look at the archives trainee "trainee" trainee presented on Professor Clidd, and what he made of them.

In post 543, Luca Blight wrote:433 - This seems ok, but the timing of it is fishy to me - I've had a lot of content since early game, so why is Hectic only now casing my early game 'friendliness' when he'd noticed it earlier?

The friendly thing isn't scum-indicative; I'm just trying to have a more laid-back approach in general, and I usually start games slowly regardless of alignment. The exceptions are when a game gets off to a very slow start and I feel compelled to get it moving myself.

Inform Knight Luca that The Force was pinged by the more recent posts in the More Evidence section, which is when they decided to look back and found similarities between the early posts and the ones from his previous lawbreaker game.

However, upon further evaluation and examining his lawbreaker game before that one, we found the the identified traits are not present there, and so we may be inclined to believe him when he says he has just decided to take a more laid back approach in recent times, and that this is NAI.

.
.
.

More to come.

We aren’t cohesive at all here.

Trust Ame imo.

Inspector "Inspector" Inspector inspecting the shit out of this.

In post 582, Iconeum wrote: (case)

Got some problems with this case.

88 has up to 4! scumreads and myself as joker. The way this post is formulated isn't intended to sort anyone, it's conclusions being drawn. In post 88.

123 says that his previous scumleans are meant to instigate interaction, but doesn't engage with them. He's literally trying to appear scumhunting while not.

235 'i don't vote early', but Clidd also isn't pressuring

any

of his scumreads. I feel he's trying to lay low and not draw too much attention by this.

These are contradictory. You state he's scumreading too many people and wants to appear like he's scumhnting but isn't, but then say he's trying to "law low" by not voting anyone. Isn't scumreading 4 people the opposite of "laying low"?

237 is pure shade on Slaxx, the slot who is scumreading Clidd at that time

334 shades me. Same in 335

Why is "casting shade" scum-indicative here? You just implied he was trying to law low by not voting, this doesn't look like he's laying low but is presenting his thoughts and comparing play he finds lawbreakery to previous lawbreakers he has imprisoned.

410 new readlist, while after all of this I am still considered the 'joker'. This doesn't match his previous posts where he was certain I'm scum.

This is a good point. I'd like to hear from Clidd why he expressed such confidence on lawbreaker!Iconeum, but to then place him under the Joker category anyway. If it had something to do with the engagement with him leading up to the reads list, I'd like to hear what changed his mind.

In post 582, Iconeum wrote: 257 sooooo many words but what do they say? Close to nothing?
416 So. Many. Words. To say what? I still don't know.

These are NAI, and we'd like to hear whether you agree once you look over his meta.

Cool, I'm out.

I will wait for you analysis, Detective . From Ico's reaction, I do not believe that it would be omitting something there about FoS on me. Seeing from an emotional point of view, of course. I am not considering the logical factor of the act. I still consider that the lack of experience with my pattern may have influenced the initial reads, giving the idea of ​​a tunnel, when in reality, it is a precaution in the face of the unknown.

trainee "trainee" trainee is also here

for now VOTE: Iconeum L-2

VOTE: Icon

L-1

, you are L-1. I believe that you are a good person to be practicing a malicious activity like lying, right ? am I correct in assuming that you were sincere in answering why you thought of my playstyle ?

UNVOTE: Iconeum

I'll vote again when it's time, but I no longer trust leaving someone at L1

@Luca why did you feel Compath over Iconeum before. You made multi-post case on Ico and barely anything on Compath.

Also I've been feeling a lack of force behind your pushes this game. Where's the spirit?

@Slaxx:

In post 529, Ame wrote:@Slaxx, can you go into your Compath read? Particularly what changed your opinion on 8 and 9 as indicated in your 227? And what influenced his placement in your 231 list?

@Ame, what was it you wanted me to clarify exactly? Why I asked you about the RQS questions?

In post 529, Ame wrote:@Luca, can you go into your Compath read? Particularly your reasoning as of 129?
@Hectic, can you provide and explain your Compath read?
@Slaxx, can you go into your Compath read? Particularly what changed your opinion on 8 and 9 as indicated in your 227? And what influenced his placement in your 231 list?
@Ico, can you elaborate on why you were reading Compath as town as of 321? Additionally, why were you worried Compath had a meta read of you if he was town reading you (185)? Additionally, why did you ask who Compath was in 28 but not ask the same of me?
@Kanna, can you go into your Compath read? Particularly your reasoning as of 328.

Additionally, I'd like to know what each of you thinks about the points I made against Compath.

I’m on mobile so I can’t give examples, but I remember a chain of their posts being really townie a few pages back. I do want to take another look since it’s been a while + I didn’t agree with their readlist.

In post 532, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 379, Kanna wrote:@Luca, what makes you so sure clidd is town if you've seen him do posts like this as scum?

Clidd typed that post before he even knew he was scum, therefore it didn't come from a scum mindset.

What do you mean? Don’t you have to confirm your role before you play? ???

In post 642, Ame wrote:@Luca why did you feel Compath over Iconeum before. You made multi-post case on Ico and barely anything on Compath.

Also I've been feeling a lack of force behind your pushes this game. Where's the spirit?

I wrongly hard SR Icon in the last game we were in together, so it’s possible I’m wrong even though I think he’s scum. Compath’s play has no redeeming features so I felt more comfortable lynching there, but as I said I’m ok lynching either of them.

You seem to always say my pushes lack force, maybe that’s just my play style? I don’t normally push really hard unless I’m convinced someone is scum.

Traveling atm, will continue when I get back home.

In post 646, Kanna wrote:

In post 532, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 379, Kanna wrote:@Luca, what makes you so sure clidd is town if you've seen him do posts like this as scum?

Clidd typed that post before he even knew he was scum, therefore it didn't come from a scum mindset.

What do you mean? Don’t you have to confirm your role before you play? ???

Read his iso from that game, he typed that post before he was sent his role PM.

I’m sure I said I didn’t ignore your reasoning. I read it, but it was an “eh,” because I could see it coming from either alignment. I would’ve been fine with reconsidering you later if you did something townie, but then the you vs slaxx thing happened and I didn’t like how you acted. It was a reaction so I don’t know why you’re holding onto the fact I didn’t engage you with it.