I wish people would read what I said and understand this. As I've been a person who's replaced into games just to die 10 posts later.
Yes it's happened in newbie games.
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 9:25 am
by clidd
@Mod
foi solicitado uma substituiĆ§Ć£o do jogador
EqsyLootz
.
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 9:26 am
by clidd
@Mod
we asked to replace the player
EqsyLootz
(correction).
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 9:41 am
by Elmo TeH AzN
The fact that you have to add a gif of Hmmm. Yeah I should have stayed away.
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 10:17 am
by clidd
In post 624, Doobietime wrote:To elaborate, I like that Ico decided to remove themselves from the wagon for the time being in order to give Eqsy a chance to respond, not necessarily due to a change of heart on the read of the slot but due to reluctance of possibly lynching a town- how I feel also*
Or at least that's my current interpretation.
I suppose it could also indicate Ico/Eqsy scum pair by unvoting but like with Elmo this would be an unavoidable FoS later. Could also provide plausible deniabilty if infact Ico does want Eqsy lynched but wants to seem unsure. Ooooh :/
*(this shared approach was also a contributing factor on my TL of Elmo before she mentioned quickhammering. Will have to reevaluate)
''
I suppose it could also indicate Ico/Eqsy scum
''
- What ? ok, Doobie
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 10:18 am
by clidd
This girl messes with my head. I can't imagine a scenario that makes sense to keep insisting on scum!Ico.
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 11:41 am
by Atarashi Hajimari
In post 633, clidd wrote:This girl messes with my head. I can't imagine a scenario that makes sense to keep insisting on scum!Ico.
What do you mean? Ico's a PR, and scum's gotta kill those PRs!
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 11:47 am
by clidd
As I understand it, Doobie is still thinking about the scum!Ico theory.
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 11:48 am
by clidd
So I am saying that i can't see a scenario that makes sense for town!Doobie to keep thinking about that.
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 11:50 am
by Atarashi Hajimari
In post 636, clidd wrote:So I am saying that i can't see a scenario that makes sense for town!Doobie to keep thinking about that.
I wish people would read what I said and understand this. As I've been a person who's replaced into games just to die 10 posts later.
Yes it's happened in newbie games.
In post 595, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:In all fairness if they do not pick the prod up I will hammer them just so a replacement doesn't come into the slot to die.
No, you clearly said 'if they don't pick up their prod' I will hammer them. Did you use the word quickhammer ? No. But the act of hammering upon not picking up prod with 3 days (which is a lot) is in fact a quickhammer.
Justifying this with 'sparing the feelings of a player' is meaningless, because this is mafia after all. Even if a replacement only gets to post a couple times, it will be valuable for everyone upon flip.
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 8:50 pm
by Elmo TeH AzN
In post 648, Iconeum wrote:No, you clearly said 'if they don't pick up their prod' I will hammer them. Did you use the word quickhammer ? No. But the act of hammering upon not picking up prod with 3 days (which is a lot) is in fact a quickhammer.
Justifying this with 'sparing the feelings of a player' is meaningless, because this is mafia after all. Even if a replacement only gets to post a couple times, it will be valuable for everyone upon flip.
1. Its not.
2. Its still not.
3. Once again if we don't get a replacement OR A DEADLINE EXTENSION. I didn't see the point of having a 3rd person just replace in to because at the time.
They were L-1
But what do I know. The simple fact that you have to use the word "quickhammer" irks me since that was never said at all.
The act of hammering for not picking up a prod to save the mod some trouble to be nice and find a replacement. I'm glad we're drawing lines in the sand now. And the act of lynching someone who is clearly not picking up a prod.