Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2020 8:21 am
Page 26 of 78
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2020 8:36 am
Thanks for that, Dave.
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2020 8:37 am
In fact, you've inspired me to make more.
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2020 8:58 am
Nono that is absolutely hilarious and perfectly fitting
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2020 9:07 am
will catchup when i have time tommorrow
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2020 9:51 am
Who's Misty hectic?
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2020 9:52 am
Ngl kinda lost on this game
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2020 9:59 am
In post 628, Morning Tweet wrote:Nono that is absolutely hilarious and perfectly fitting
tictac/Chemist1422In post 630, SirCakez wrote:Who's Misty hectic?
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 5:38 am
Chemist1422 (4): Gamma Emerald, Cat Scratch Fever, Hectic, profii
Aloratom (4): Chemist1422, davesaz, AaronFrost, Wake88
ok we have two wagons so far.
Chemist what do you think of alort yourself. As i see that your vote was originaly cast by tictac. Do you agree with it?
Aloratom (4): Chemist1422, davesaz, AaronFrost, Wake88
ok we have two wagons so far.
Chemist what do you think of alort yourself. As i see that your vote was originaly cast by tictac. Do you agree with it?
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 5:40 am
Interesting that Alo is not on the Chemist wagon
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 5:46 am
Cat Scratch Fever has been prodded.
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 8:03 am
I asked the same thing.In post 633, bob3141 wrote:Chemist1422 (4): Gamma Emerald, Cat Scratch Fever, Hectic, profii
Aloratom (4): Chemist1422, davesaz, AaronFrost, Wake88
ok we have two wagons so far.
Chemist what do you think of alort yourself. As i see that your vote was originaly cast by tictac. Do you agree with it?
Can you respond to 519?
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 9:17 am
Interesting that you're not voting.In post 634, SirCakez wrote:Interesting that Alo is not on the Chemist wagon
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 9:48 am
VOTE: davesazIn post 637, davesaz wrote:Interesting that you're not voting.In post 634, SirCakez wrote:Interesting that Alo is not on the Chemist wagon
satisfied?
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 10:32 am
I think you made a read strength based off the time. The read in itself wasnt note worthy as players can get scum reads early but they tend not to be set in stone.In post 519, Aloratom wrote:Bob -- I don't know if you missed this. While all that dumb stuff between Wake and me was going on it seemed that you realized that my vote on you was RVS but your answer to Dave seems a little different. Do you really think I made a "quick early scum read" on you?In post 410, Aloratom wrote:Did you think that RVS post where I voted you was a serious post?In post 396, bob3141 wrote:In post 391, davesaz wrote:So Bob, gotta ask -- in this game he said you were scum without any reason.In post 228, bob3141 wrote:at first galnce i woudl say alorat seems different from his scum game. There he was say x and y was scum without any reason.
If that's what he does in scumgames, then why were you so nonchalant about it here?
This feels a little selective. I say alor in general is not acting like he was in his scum game. And you jump on the fact that he made a quick early scum read. Although he may of given a bit of a scum read at the same time he is saying things like in post 262. Where he says he hasnt got handle on me. Thus what ever read he has is not strong. With this same read being a page 4 read and not real much of big deal.
What level of reason wuld you expect anyoen to have so early into teh game. where if everyone posted equally no one woudl hae more than 7 posts. With me havign 3 or so mostly rvs posts. What level of reason would you realy expect any player to have at that point.
And everything else regarding me in his posts has not been to push me but just generaly commenting on early events in neutral manner.
In his scum game he as active in throwing shade around and persistently push the same reads and pushs even though he never backed them up
At the moment im leaning towards you being town and dave trying to make a case out of something. As its not like you really stuck to it. Felt to me like a sligth early scum read re-evaluated and i can see it that happening. Someimes a player will push and other times they will change their mind earlier
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 10:34 am
I can sorta see where you got the associative read now, but I feel it's not unreasonable that scum!alo does that even if tictac was town due to it being earlier in the day and being a policy lynch mostly. He could always flip back if needed to hammer due to accepting the premise of the lynch.In post 591, AaronFrost wrote:Again, defense probably wasn't the right word to use there, but there was some caution/hesitancy around voting the wagon while still trying to justify it by saying he's okay with it. It's scummy positioning no matter which way you look at it tbh.In post 564, HoldenGolden wrote:I would have no qualms with this post since AFF was following similarly in my logic of Alo not wanting to be on a p lynch for a lurker. However, that implies in a sense that tictac was town since Alo gets more for bussing his afk partner than actively trying to deflect the lynch. Especially considering that he said he was fine with the lynch (so it wasn't a defence at all).
As it stands, I dont understand what afk rabbit hole lead AFF to the associative reads. Even if you read into alo posts for associative tells before the flip, I feel you would come to the opposite conclusion that it was a TvS interaction rather than SvS. Alo's push on hectic was anything but strong, let alone enough to chainsaw defend him.
So now aaron, I have the very specific question for you. What lead you to the notion that alo and tictac are SvS given the fact we both had issues with him not wanting to join the p lynch on a lurker?
The reason it gave me pings of partner interactions was because if Alora!scum and tictac/Chemist!town, then that's an easy wagon for Alora to jump on.
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 10:35 am
VOTE: Dave
Time for more serous vote than mine on hectic.
Hectic if your not scum, so far every game together has been town town
Time for more serous vote than mine on hectic.
Hectic if your not scum, so far every game together has been town town
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 10:36 am
Are you talking about my read list or in response to MT?In post 609, profii wrote:There is resistance to get the chemist wagon over the line (aka tictac)
I'm happy voting there
Slightly concerned HoldenGolden said voting me makes sense, didnt really provide a reason to do so, but most concerningly, seemed to just give up on that thought after 1 post.
Feel free to expand the sub plot of your post
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 10:45 am
Does anybody have experience with chemist subbing in day 1? IE if they survive till day 2 do they actually ramp up in post/content?
If not then I think the best lynch is chemist. Even given the claim, I'm finding them hard to read and they are still being relatively reactive. I rather not have to wait to lynch them purely out of them being a question mark before lylo than going ahead and getting it out of the way now. While alo is scummy, I feel the chemist lynch overall is better long term wise with a good chance of getting scum.
If we want to go with Alo though we need to push now so we get enough time for claim.
If not then I think the best lynch is chemist. Even given the claim, I'm finding them hard to read and they are still being relatively reactive. I rather not have to wait to lynch them purely out of them being a question mark before lylo than going ahead and getting it out of the way now. While alo is scummy, I feel the chemist lynch overall is better long term wise with a good chance of getting scum.
If we want to go with Alo though we need to push now so we get enough time for claim.
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 10:47 am
You are going to need to put much more behind this rather than the vote alone. May I here why is dave scum formally?In post 641, bob3141 wrote:VOTE: Dave
Time for more serous vote than mine on hectic.
Hectic if your not scum, so far every game together has been town town
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 10:48 am
I called Aloratom traitor voting for scum Bob. Remember this if I get mislynched.
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 10:53 am
In post 644, HoldenGolden wrote:You are going to need to put much more behind this rather than the vote alone. May I here why is dave scum formally?In post 641, bob3141 wrote:VOTE: Dave
Time for more serous vote than mine on hectic.
Hectic if your not scum, so far every game together has been town town
I dont like alort lynch. and tic/chem have had little input.
Its not strong read but gut feeling on dave
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 10:58 am
but overall dave just feels off to me/
I dont feel town dave would have jumped onto alort for something so small. I feel he might have started pushing him over more but not just for giving a early weak scum read. that was changed rather quickly with that added to the fact that he real hasnt moved off him.
Migth have talked about others but has just stuck to him
I dont feel town dave would have jumped onto alort for something so small. I feel he might have started pushing him over more but not just for giving a early weak scum read. that was changed rather quickly with that added to the fact that he real hasnt moved off him.
Migth have talked about others but has just stuck to him
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 11:04 am
Ok so essentially last couple of pages are SirCakes interpreting something of Aaron's being a mislynch line up, but it was a misunderstanding
Alo jumped on the Aaron wagon in hopes it'd get something started. I don't really get what Alo is asking in 636/516. I want to try and get more of an understanding about Alo and his wagon cause it's mostly losing me
I guess Chem is as caught up as she's going to get..? I am not very experienced interpreting claims at L-1, but im fine voting there if that's what it comes down to
profii never noticed me (;﹏;)
Alo jumped on the Aaron wagon in hopes it'd get something started. I don't really get what Alo is asking in 636/516. I want to try and get more of an understanding about Alo and his wagon cause it's mostly losing me
I guess Chem is as caught up as she's going to get..? I am not very experienced interpreting claims at L-1, but im fine voting there if that's what it comes down to
profii never noticed me (;﹏;)
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 11:09 am
tweet are you talking about chemists one shot jail keeper claim.
Its a weak claim as it realy only has one shot if true. And unlikely to be self resolving nor be strong choice for scum trying to avoid beign lynched. If he was scum i woudl have assumed he would have just claimed jailkeeper.
But last game i was in chem claimed assetic doc even though plain doc would have been a better claim
Its a weak claim as it realy only has one shot if true. And unlikely to be self resolving nor be strong choice for scum trying to avoid beign lynched. If he was scum i woudl have assumed he would have just claimed jailkeeper.
But last game i was in chem claimed assetic doc even though plain doc would have been a better claim