Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 6:51 pm
No, it would mean that it was incomplete. But meta means nothing to me.In post 623, Luna Fox wrote:Well it would mean that his meta assesment of your play is incorrect.In post 622, Jake The Wolfie wrote:If I did, would that mean anything?In post 621, Luna Fox wrote:Do you have any meta of you lurking out Day 1 as town before that disproves Churros meta assesment of your play?
Intent to hammer. Please claimIn post 447, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I would consider a spontaneous hammer on Peter Pan to be a scum reveal.
However, if everyone had an equal chance to hammer them, who wouldn't be scumclaiming because of it?
Didn't I get lynched in our last game together? I mean, if you are scum then you have 2 extra players that will vote me if they need two. Could you get me lynched? maybe though this playlist is a little more familiar with me and you'd have to come at me with something better than that bullshit you posted earlier.In post 503, bji wrote:If I was scum it is provably true that I could get you lynched. But lucky for you I am town. Although if you are scum then unlucky for you because I'm going to get you lynched.In post 488, Nero Cain wrote:don't really care about Zan hedging on me. If he's scum he's not going to be able to get me lynched anyways.
thanks, now we know where to hunt tomorrow.In post 541, Jake The Wolfie wrote:There are definite scum on Pan's Wagon. And they are relatively close to the middle
do u think he is town?In post 629, Firebringer wrote:he is self voting profii. he can move his vote off to avoid ur hammer.
what r u doing
not reallyIn post 631, Nero Cain wrote:do u think he is town?
It sounds like you think he is town.In post 631, Nero Cain wrote:thanks, now we know where to hunt tomorrow.
Agreed.In post 628, profii wrote:if we dont hammer someone we will never move on
You said to Jake: "thanks, now we know where to hunt tommorow." Implying you assumed he would flip town and we’d look at the middle voters in Peter Pan in the next day phase. That’s what i gathered from it, unless you were being ironic. But if so, that was very unclear.In post 636, Nero Cain wrote:I do? I love how ppl on this site think they know my thoughts and feelings better than I know my own thoughts and feelings.
or maybe norway just can't read,
I gotta say. Signalling intent to hammer on a slot that’s self-voting is pretty weird alright.In post 628, profii wrote:Intent to hammer. Please claim
Nero cain is horny rn.In post 636, Nero Cain wrote:I do? I love how ppl on this site think they know my thoughts and feelings better than I know my own thoughts and feelings.
or maybe norway just can't read,
umm yeh it is. Its an artificial L-1. If the person moves their vote its back to L-2. So him saying "claim or I hammer" is fucking out there.In post 641, Nero Cain wrote:it's really not
I reread her defense of me and I was like "wait does she really townread me...wait shouldn't she be more paranoid of me?"In post 645, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Bruh. Why are you paranoid of Luna.
I second this intent so it will be a hammer even if jake unvotes.In post 628, profii wrote:Intent to hammer. Please claim