Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2020 10:32 am
Pine (4): WLC + A50 + Fuzzy + Swift
Fuzzy (1): skies
Italiano (1): Inso
WLC/Fuzzy (1): skies
No vote: Pine
Fuzzy (1): skies
Italiano (1): Inso
WLC/Fuzzy (1): skies
No vote: Pine
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
In post 624, brighteningskies wrote:I don't necessarily agree that we should check Pine. He seems to just be scumhunting and sharing his opinions normally and I'm not getting many scum pings from him personally.
I also kinda agree that if it were not me as the first check that returned corrupt it might be a good idea for them to share them.
I still say we should check WLC or fuzzy.
arent you the one who just claimed scum? what? this is a prodge?In post 626, Glitch wrote:Sorry I vanished. Should have announced VLA but forgot to. We adopted our foster son this week and have had family in town since then. It's been crazy.
I think the best target for the clairvoyant to check tonight is me. It would be great!
this is a terrible readlist. why is bright skies a scumlean?In post 627, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:In post 624, brighteningskies wrote:I don't necessarily agree that we should check Pine. He seems to just be scumhunting and sharing his opinions normally and I'm not getting many scum pings from him personally.
I also kinda agree that if it were not me as the first check that returned corrupt it might be a good idea for them to share them.
I still say we should check WLC or fuzzy.
Bright- scum hunting by calling for the Cop to be outed.Okay sure. Its not just him asking to out the clairvoyant. its that he acting like he wants to protect PR and then putting one of the most important PR in danger. To me he seems to be continuing to push this even though it is the best move..It it was the clairvoyant would of claimed. Not sure why you are soft defending Pine here. Also why I am a better choice then Pine . I know maybe I am not the best town but I am far from scummy IMHO. All he is doing playing games . Even if he not wolf I consider him anti town atm.
We know there is an Alpha wolf...... It would be nice if Glitch full claim but I do not think he will .
Reads
- Italian- (antitown but prob not a wolf
-A-50- hard town
- Bright Skies- Leaning Scum
- Pine -Anti town/ leaning wolf
- Taylor- slightly leaning scum
-Elements- hard town
- Insomania - leaning town
-WLC- not sure
Glitch- Wolf and needs to be burn with fire
In post 626, Glitch wrote:We adopted our foster son this week.
This is probably an all town list for checks.In post 106, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i think elements should be the investigation. if elements is clairvoyant then maybe pine or italiano or another quiet slot? i dont mind if its me either. galron, me correcting a typo someone made is pretty easy to fake as scum. fuzzy is pretty town except fuzzy has been rolefishing.
This post doesn't really read like it's going anywhere. I get a vague feeling they were trying to emphasize / support the idea that town shouldn't out their ballots.In post 107, Tayl0r Swift wrote:heres a question: so far i really dont have much idea who other people are balloting. town may have an advantage if we keep it quiet and just vote for who we think is scummiest. on the other hand, this is probably really bad since scum can simply rig the ballot by coordinating. although they may not have numbers to ensure more than half the ballot.
Again - if you thought Elements was a specific role, then why'd you suggest he got checked by the clairvoyant? It reads as though you thought Elements was town, so why did you need the seer to be on him?In post 149, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i think we should put a50 on the ballot. that whole exchange i was thinking STOP MAKING ELEMENTS OUT, and a50 kept pushing and pushing for a claim. thats really not a good look.
The bolded is an example of what a scum mindset of "pushing for things that look scummy but won't make someone more likely to flip scum" looks like. If you stay and dig into it, what did Taylor think was suspicious about not wanting Elements, a town PR (in Taylor's eyes), to out themselves? It looks like a fairly townie thing, if you ask me. It doesn't make much sense from a Taylor!town point of view, I think.In post 176, Tayl0r Swift wrote:In post 174, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:He Glitz
Please catch up as fast as you can
in the mean times.....we are claiming Corrupt/Non Corrupt. We also are deciding who to ballot
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Italian has to be the sinner ,seducer or a wolf
-if he is the sinner then either him or Skies is lying and we need to execute one of them asap
- If he is the seducer = I would think there was a priest. I can not imagine having two false positive -This seems like it would make the game very scum leaning. Suposing there is atleast 2 scum. If he is the seducer he needs to claim the next post or get balloted
if we have a priest he/she needs to claim so we can confirm we have a sinner and a suducer and who the Sinner is.
Elements should not claim.......He does need to explain his action betterwhy are you now saying elements shouldnt claim when you were pushing so hard for info before?
I don’t see how that changes anything.In post 643, Tayl0r Swift wrote:your case on me consists things i said on page 5? i mean... ok...
Maybe I missed it, but why couldn't Galron have been a real wolf?In post 619, Pine wrote:If Galron was a wolf, he was Defector. A Medium or Clairvoyant check wouldn't mean anything.
It's why I want the Clairvoyant to out with it, because if it's not Skies + Glitch, then we've probably got our solution.
goodIn post 645, insomnia wrote:I don’t see how that changes anything.In post 643, Tayl0r Swift wrote:your case on me consists things i said on page 5? i mean... ok...
If you’d like me to provide a more recent read, looking through your ISO, you are just surfing the game flow and don’t look like you’re evaluating much.
Your checks for the clairvoyant appear from basically thin air ; the only time you mentioned WLC was in the post you wanted them to be checked and fuzzy’s mention was the second time you brought him up.
I don’t really see how you’re evaluating the game or how you progress through your reads. I actually don’t even know what your reads are.