Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:33 am
I like this wagon
I support the righteous and glorious lilith wagon, but recognize that my efforts have a fairly decent chance of being futile today due to her position in the draftIn post 625, Dunnstral wrote:I like this wagon
I don't normally comment on stuff I agree with or butt into other people's conversations.In post 552, Uncrowned wrote:Is there a reason you've singled out TGP here while ignoring most of the others slots in the game?
More focus on posting and less on numbers.In post 553, Hoopla wrote:i also just realised jackson virgo is in the group of 4's. this is shocking play on my part. there's no way i'm executing from that bracket on D1.
If there are multiple 4's, one of them would want to make this argument.In post 559, Hoopla wrote:there is max one scum amongst us 4's, unless a zany gambit is afoot.
Nah, never underestimate the power of an early bus. It's basically without risk and can establish anti-associatives if too many people think this way.In post 561, Uncrowned wrote:Hoopla's joining of your wagon though makes me believe that if one of you is scum, the other will not be.
My experience is mostly the underwhelming games.In post 584, skitter30 wrote:He has towngames like the one you describe, but he also has towngames where he's more underwhelming and absentIn post 576, Hoopla wrote:dunnstral - played a game as scum against him recently, and he was a dominant voice on D1 that seemed quite obviously town. granted, i had confirmed info that game which can sometimes trick you into thinking someone is more town than they actually are, but i haven't seen similar town energy from him yet.
I approve of your assessment of me : thumbsup:
I also, separately, read Hoopla as scum because of her vote hopping and what looks to be a very opportunistic mindset where the goal is miselimination rather than scum hunting and finding town, and in that regard, the above quote is really bad - you shouldn't be "tricked" into attacking people unless your reads aren't actually genuine.In post 576, Hoopla wrote:she also tricked me into attacking a fellow member of the 4 bracket!
Exactly, the numbers should be the last thing on our minds d1. It doesn't actually become relevant until someone early in the draft doesn't get NK'd.In post 590, JacksonVirgo wrote:I don't like the fact they refuse to read in the 4s or whatnot, I feel that's just stupid for town to do.
I have not looked at all previous runs, but AFAIK there has always been at least one PR that is not chosen in the draft.In post 594, JacksonVirgo wrote:Is there a world where all the PRs are active btw?
It doesn't appear on my browser, so I think it shows based on the client-side timestamp. Happy scumday in advance I guess?In post 612, JacksonVirgo wrote:Get fucked Hoopa I now have the cake!
Yes, but that's not the point.In post 544, JacksonVirgo wrote:Uh, what? Natural is not a convoluted way of saying good.
You think that bracket is likely to be all town?In post 553, Hoopla wrote:i also just realised jackson virgo is in the group of 4's. this is shocking play on my part. there's no way i'm executing from that bracket on D1.
i apologise to jackson virgo for my overeagerness.
It seems mostly accurate and I would like to hear a response from dave if he hasn't given one yet.In post 565, Uncrowned wrote:sorry to be self-indulgent but do you have any thoughts on Post 552
Maybe?In post 583, skitter30 wrote:Except town!her usually brings a lot more content, is more focused, doesn't ask inane questions which basically dont go anywhere (but this is something she does as scum!), and is capable of quickly becoming an obvtown force to be reckoned with
I took some stats on this setup a little while back. (I can link them if anyone's curious.) They don't directly answer this but I think from collecting them I recall this happening only a few times out of 15. Usually at least one is missed.In post 594, JacksonVirgo wrote:Is there a world where all the PRs are active btw?
I mean, they're just commenting on a lot of things, full stop.In post 601, petapan wrote:you seem to be commenting on a lot of trivial things
Wouldn't it make more sense to vote PP first then?In post 637, TheGoldenParadox wrote:if i'm right on hoopla, penguin is almost guaranteed scum.
In post 637, TheGoldenParadox wrote:i also believe that Hoopla flipping red absolutely condemns Penguin whereas the opposite is not necessarily the case, and so this is a better elimination for today.