Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:05 pm
And now I am complete
~pun
~pun
~punIn post 627, punpun wrote:gonna be real it feels like our elim is trying to get pushed through super quick now in the face of a claim without any analysis and that there are super flimsy reasons to disregard it but ya know.
No it’s not wtfIn post 597, punpun wrote:OHHH the thing in the movie was a bunyip
WE ARE LITERALLY THE PROTAGONIST OF THE FILM
~pun
In post 634, Alchemist21 wrote:Could be a fakeclaim, could be real but scum, but at least I know they got it from boon.
In post 635, Infinity 324 wrote:Makes sense, it does say it can be any alignment so
I think they made up the part about being the main character, since we don't have flavored roles.
I'd be willing to buy this, except...In post 636, Alchemist21 wrote:They might have looked up that it’s a creature that lives in water and made that assumption.
And maybe boon did actually do that because it would be somewhat fitting
In post 596, punpun wrote:i did not watch the shape of water to try and figure out what a bunyip was just for people not to believe us!!
~punpun
In post 597, punpun wrote:OHHH the thing in the movie was a bunyip
WE ARE LITERALLY THE PROTAGONIST OF THE FILM
~pun
are you going to respond or just banter about the single least consequential part of my post?In post 530, punpun wrote:was intentional. we were aiming for the same second, but alas. perfection is hard to strive for.In post 519, The Bulge wrote:Spoiler: posted 8 seconds apart
punhead's given reasons for voting Alchemist areextremelyweak and I fail to see how that could ever possibly sway the other head's opinion. if you discussed your differing reads of alchemist with each other, what else did you talk about? surely there were other reasons given in private.
~pun
what is this supposed to mean? yea, a passionate tone could very well be town-indicative on its own, but not when it is faked.In post 531, punpun wrote:All of the things you're pointing out here are towny, not scummy. "I've kinda shelved him as probtown" is just the way I talk.In post 520, The Bulge wrote:it's minor but it's mostly a language thing. your tone comes off as somewhat... passionate? in the first and last lines. the "I've kinda shelved him as probtown" line sticks out to me. your feelings toward the slot don't seem genuine in that post.In post 486, punpun wrote:Explain why? I'm irritated with what he's saying in calling the game boring, saying it's a loss due to the playerlist etc, it's negative and anti-fun. But still, I thought it was town-indicative at the time because it draws a lot of negative attention, and scum usually aren't so bold.In post 474, The Bulge wrote:I didnt catch that before but the mocking tone in the first part doesnt really line up to me with how theyre choosing to deal with the slot in that same post
~pun
~pun
these are all reaches, each trying to poke at an inconsistency that doesn't exist.In post 533, punpun wrote:In post 82, punpun wrote:Weird that you have a full readlist with everyone on separate tiers already. My only read right now is that I townlean Gamma.In post 68, Sailor Senshi wrote:Sailor Senshi
Derp
Gamma Emerald
Alchemist21
Tayl0r Swift
Creature
Punpun
Infinity 324
I think I'm approximately here as of this page
I'm letting the other scouts handle voting tho
-merc
Explain the derp and Infinity reads.
VOTE: Sailors
~punIn post 84, punpun wrote:Also weird that Infinity asks about pun and not himself who's at the bottom. Why weren't you curious about yourself, Infinity?In post 69, Infinity 324 wrote:Why is pun scum?
~punIn post 99, punpun wrote:VOTE: InfinityIn post 97, Infinity 324 wrote:I'm just an awkward person in general I think, I'm also trying to get the game going since it's been a bit slow so far.
Why was your vote on Swift naked if you were trying to get the game going?
~punWant to explain why us solving and questioning people is "bad-faith questions and pushes"?In post 103, punpun wrote:You think ability to be funny is something that's alignment indicative?In post 100, Sailor Senshi wrote:this was actually pretty funny. my townlean here is just a spicy hot take off this one post, I'll need more to cement it
~pun
~pun
In post 526, The Bulge wrote:if nothing else, referring to himself in thethird personshould have done it, but that's not important. it's the toneshift that stood out most to me.
there isn't a lot I can point to that makes you lean scum to me, i think to a certain degree i just always read you as scum.
Alchemist21 -> 21 legal drinking age -> sinful adultIn post 463, The Bulge wrote:what's up
UNVOTE:
taylor [1]obvtown,infinity [2]obvtown
i could doalchemist [3]or gamma or punpun
= do the opposite -> innocent childIn post 518, The Bulge wrote:no,
This is just a scumclaim soIn post 592, punpun wrote:if there's a real doc/Neapolitan, they should counterclaim us but they don't exist most likely, so there won't be any CCs
you know who the heads are?In post 555, Creature wrote:I have Aster and The Great Wall in mind. Both were pretty damn obvious scum and yet endgamed while shitting all over a widely townread me.
where did I push you?In post 562, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think the bad faith push this pun talked about makes sense, especially on me
lmao I do actually think this is a real scumslip as wellIn post 592, punpun wrote:*shrug* we're past it
if you're not convinced, you're not convinced
if there's a real doc/Neapolitan, they should counterclaim us but they don't exist most likely, so there won't be any CCs
~pun