Mafiascum.net

ffs i randomly skimmed and saw the words

note to review setup so-

In post 0, Thestatusquo wrote:If you are alone with an imposter in a room during the night phase they will be given the option to kill you. Only one extra imposter kill can happen per night.

ok yeah, +100 to +3 person groups, ideally.

but you know, we have an odd number of players

so we could like.... have more than 3.

In post 578, SirCakez wrote:I think Pooky/Ali/BM group is actually super trustworthy and we should make sure they are with different groups so they can "secure" each one

I actually don’t have a reason to trust pooky yet. I also am just slow when it comes to trusting people though so...

—

In post 579, Flea The Magician wrote:I'm watching Ali tbh, I've been burned there before and it was

P A I N F U L

this stance weirds me out. Not sure what teh reason is to be paranoid tbh. Maybe it just doesn’t matter tho.

In post 580, Titus wrote:If I get mislimmed day one, there's little I can do. I have accepted that with this game state. I have an easy task if I slowly post day 2.

That being said, I do feel my wagon is scum driven though. Consensus is gathering around no elimination but yet people vote me for actually voting for it.

Here are my actual weak reads though.

HC is scum riding off town Reck's coattails to disrupt the game.

BM is scum for waiting on a consensus before voting me. His position on me is just hot garbage in his ISO. He appeared fine when it was just me and him going to electrical but sad when Ali was added to the mix. That would have three in electrical. Removing me makes two in electrical.

Taly and Flea are town because of their metas.

Pooky and Alisae are town.

Cakez is town.

I like
Most of this
Me thinks

Treating this like you treat the game, you can either run around and hope you don't get murderised, or you try and group up. A lot of the time the grouping up doesn't happen until there's smaller numbers despite the obvious advantages.

Actually having sat and thought about it (owwie ( ⚆ _ ⚆ ) ).

1-2 tasks each, taking between 1 and 2 room phases. Min 1 phase, max 4 Phases. 4 Phases is incredibly unlikely.
2-3 is likely the average.

Going for a task victory alone isn't going to work I don't think. We know there's probably sabotage things that can be done, and I think it's a safe assumption that each player ejection would add another phase at least for the first 2 or 3 phases?

Be like a carrot on the end of the stick kinda thing I reckon, we'll get to it but it'll always just be out of reach...


hmmmm

In post 627, Alisae wrote:

In post 579, Flea The Magician wrote:I'm watching Ali tbh, I've been burned there before and it was

P A I N F U L

this stance weirds me out. Not sure what teh reason is to be paranoid tbh. Maybe it just doesn’t matter tho.

Suffice to say I'm not going back to school with you, you bully .( ̵˃﹏˂̵ )

Yeah I’m really interested in what alignment is okay with what tbh

In post 623, Akarin wrote:Cakez, why were you ISOing Gamma if you're concerned about the Titus wagon being scum-driven?

I didn't ISO gamma?

In post 630, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 627, Alisae wrote:

In post 579, Flea The Magician wrote:I'm watching Ali tbh, I've been burned there before and it was

P A I N F U L

this stance weirds me out. Not sure what teh reason is to be paranoid tbh. Maybe it just doesn’t matter tho.

Suffice to say I'm not going back to school with you, you bully .( ̵˃﹏˂̵ )

I’m not that hard to read :/

I think that scum probably has to play well to prevent a task victory.
But there's a reason you don't go for the scholar's mate every game in chess, optimal play involves assuming your opponent will play well.
I still think the stuff we've learned so far has been super useful. And I still think that full mass claim probably isn't necessary to get enough info to leash.
If we know that there's going to be 3+ people in cafeteria, weapons and nav then people who haven't claimed know where to go to be safe.

In post 566, SirCakez wrote:

In post 528, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: reckoner
Nah, not letting you act like you’re willing to play ball and then try to run away with it when you realize you have to play fair

In post 543, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 457, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 121, xRECKONERx wrote:oh, not eliminating anyone to give us time to do tasks is pretty smart actually? i think?

How’d you know that came up?

And yeah why the fuck are you okay with the no elim but not the plan portion?
VOTE: Reckoner
TGP you had a point about looking at who supported what.

Don't like these votes at all

Titus

wagon feels scum driven

These weren't accidental misquotes?

- who feels like scum who is going along with/wants the massclaim plan

In post 633, Alisae wrote:

In post 630, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 627, Alisae wrote:

In post 579, Flea The Magician wrote:I'm watching Ali tbh, I've been burned there before and it was

P A I N F U L

this stance weirds me out. Not sure what teh reason is to be paranoid tbh. Maybe it just doesn’t matter tho.

Suffice to say I'm not going back to school with you, you bully .( ̵˃﹏˂̵ )

I’m not that hard to read :/

In fairness I caught on pretty quick to your alignment, it was more the NK of me and WIFOM your way out of it that has me watching you (̿▀̿ ̿Ĺ̯̿̿▀̿ ̿)̄

Btw flea you probably shouldn’t put votes in spoilers
They won’t get counted

In post 636, Alisae wrote:

@Reck

- who feels like scum who is going along with/wants the massclaim plan

I’ll extend this to as well

In post 635, Akarin wrote:

In post 566, SirCakez wrote:

In post 528, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: reckoner
Nah, not letting you act like you’re willing to play ball and then try to run away with it when you realize you have to play fair

In post 543, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 457, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 121, xRECKONERx wrote:oh, not eliminating anyone to give us time to do tasks is pretty smart actually? i think?

How’d you know that came up?

And yeah why the fuck are you okay with the no elim but not the plan portion?
VOTE: Reckoner
TGP you had a point about looking at who supported what.

Don't like these votes at all

Titus

wagon feels scum driven

These weren't accidental misquotes?

no I quoted them as i was reading along the main game thread

Alisae do you think people opposing the massclaim/no-elim plan are scummy?

In post 638, Alisae wrote:Btw flea you probably shouldn’t put votes in spoilers
They won’t get counted

It wasn't really a serious vote anyway

In post 641, SirCakez wrote:Alisae do you think people opposing the massclaim/no-elim plan are scummy?

I will say that I’m definitely the most interested in haschel, but I am not sure on if they’re scummy. I feel like there has to be some town that don’t want to go along with it, and there is probably some scum that are going along with it.

I feel like its best to figure out the motivation from both sides tbh

I will admit I'm paranoid players like Reck are playing up their oppositionalness to everything to skate by

And I think its best to wait to sort reck

VOTE: Haschel
This is what I want to put the most pressure on right now me thinks

Scum motivation for anything is information and towncred.

Town's motivation is find scum and win.

It pretty much always comes down to that surely?

In post 647, Flea The Magician wrote:Scum motivation for anything is information and towncred.

Town's motivation is find scum and win.

It pretty much always comes down to that surely?

What I’m trying to communicate is I have no fucking idea and I think its more important to evaluate both sides of the arguement.

The way you describe it Flea makes it sounds like scum supports massclaim