Mafiascum.net

In post 624, notscience wrote:My bottom line is you or VP is scum

where the fuck does this come from

My mind

Because I literally just played a similar setup to this since my hiatus has been over and my top strategy was “abate my hood partner” then he caught my scum bud off my posts and killed me after

But I’m town this time and he is sketchy so it’s my turn >:)

In post 594, Gamma Emerald wrote:I was giving the thread a chance to breathe, sorry you didn’t get the memo scum.

I've been imploring all four of you to give valuable content if you have it. Sorry you haven't bothered to read, scum.

Where in this thread have I been unclear I was holding off so others could do stuff? Why do you act the way you do towards me given that?

In post 615, Noraa wrote:Gamma has too many SRs and almost all of that readlist just looks like my reads that have been scattered around this game grouped together and then tweaked to sound more gamma-y.

No no. I don't think this is town gamma.

VOTE: Gamma

wooooooooooooooooooooof this looks v bad to me

still not bad enough to make me stop wanting to yeet pooky but i would hammer a L-1 noraa

what's your opinion on VP, reck

In post 621, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 619, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 615, Noraa wrote:Gamma has too many SRs and almost all of that readlist just looks like my reads that have been scattered around this game grouped together and then tweaked to sound more gamma-y.

No no. I don't think this is town gamma.

VOTE: Gamma

I want to hear baltar's opinion on this post right now

Scummy to say you'd yeet everyone basically

Baltar defending noraa even though she is straight scumspewing with that post lol

Um no VP called that post out there

like can someone explain to me how 615 makes any sense whatsoever from a town POV?

Why would Gamma!scum who is the leading vote-getter and in a semi-gladiate decide to hurl a bunch of SRs around... as scum? Is he trying to get himself yeeted off the face of the planet? Is it some weird wifom trick?

When is too many SRs even a scumtell? Which of his SRs do you disagree with? What part of his reasoning do you disagree with? Instead it's just "too many SRs must be bad" like whaaaat?!

VP called out the post? am I just reading his response wrong? what do you mean?

VP was actually answering your question, saying it was scummy of noraa to leave everyone else in the pool open as a yeet candidate. Maybe getting it wrong but that's the vibe I got.

I didn't say anything that would amount to "would yeet everyone", I stated several townreads on people and the only thing that wasn't any level of townread within to pool was my VP leanscum read.

In post 637, Gamma Emerald wrote:VP was actually answering your question, saying it was scummy of noraa to leave everyone else in the pool open as a yeet candidate. Maybe

I'm

getting it wrong but that's the vibe I got.

That is the right interpretation. I'm saying that was pretty scummy for noraa to say

oh i thought he was agreeing with her that Gamma was scummy for SRing everyone

VOTE: noraa

And no Noraa I won’t get in a spam argument with you over this so don’t try pls and thx

In post 567, Noraa wrote:I can think about voting vp today in return for a cake yeet tomorrow.

Setting up elims is inherently scummy.

In post 581, VP Baltar wrote:People should start voting so we can move this challenge to a conclusion and real challenges can begin.

Why isn't this a real challenge?

In post 603, Gamma Emerald wrote:Starbuck: she initially captured my mind with her thought-out quote walls but my heart didn’t buy it and my heart was validated when she wrote off Pooky vs. VP in favor of fueling the non-existent Gamma vs. Noraa fire. She has not said a single word on that since initially calling them hard-to-read. Scum.

I need to do some more reading before I'll feel confident on my reads of Pooky and VP. I said as such in my catch ups, so why does that make me scum?

In post 622, Noraa wrote:

In post 618, notscience wrote:Starbuck said I was underestimating you. I have adjusted my reads accordingly.

Does Starbuck even know my meta?

What does your meta matter? He called you naive and said VP was exploiting you. The idea of someone "exploiting" you, or anyone else, is not a good feeling and I'm not about that type of shit. I'm glad that notsci was receptive to what I said (he could have gotten real defensive, but he didn't) and took the constructive criticism for what it was.

In post 642, Starbuck wrote:I need to do some more reading before I'll feel confident on my reads of Pooky and VP. I said as such in my catch ups, so why does that make me scum?

I haven't seen a single peep from you indicating you're actually doing it. And you've got a strict timetable to do so if you want to change my mind, specifically, once this challenge ends I'm set on it, because then the topic becomes sorta a non-issue.

Cake is scum and I firmly believe in this. It's my strongest SR in this game.

Gamma/Notsci both scummy asf

I get it my post was scummy. Fair enough and I don't know what to say cuz it was certainly scummy.

In post 644, Noraa wrote:Cake is scum and I firmly believe in this. It's my strongest SR in this game.

Gamma/Notsci both scummy asf

I get it my post was scummy. Fair enough and I don't know what to say cuz it was certainly scummy.

why have I been on Gamma all day then?

In post 645, SirCakez wrote:

In post 644, Noraa wrote:Cake is scum and I firmly believe in this. It's my strongest SR in this game.

Gamma/Notsci both scummy asf

I get it my post was scummy. Fair enough and I don't know what to say cuz it was certainly scummy.

why have I been on Gamma all day then?

The more you try to convince me, the more im certain ur scum.

Town!cake does not react to a SR the way you are doing it rn. Town!Cake is the scummiest player on the surface of the planet(this is exaggerated to help push my point). Town!Cake doesn't talk logic. Doesn't talk anything except what he thinks.

This is not town!cake.

I wouldn't word it the same but I agree with the vibe of how Noraa is perceiving Cakez
I won't call myself good at reading Cakez but he has patterns of behavior I'm not sure he's entirely aware of and able to control yet.

In post 647, Gamma Emerald wrote:I wouldn't word it the same but I agree with the vibe of how Noraa is perceiving Cakez
I won't call myself good at reading Cakez but he has patterns of behavior I'm not sure he's entirely aware of and able to control yet.

Oh how my reads change.

TR gamma.

UNVOTE:

Its hard to describe why im SRing Cake. It truly is a soul read.