Mafiascum.net

In post 623, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 622, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 618, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 529, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This game needs an actual good push to get some good discussion going.

I've actually found this game to be quite refreshing so far, with decent discussion with minimal shit posting. Do you just not like any of the current wagons?

Actually i like this.
Competing wagons between Cheeky/Mini makes the game much easier for me to read in terms of finding scum.

There have been other wagons...

Did none of them ping you?

In post 620, Vaxkiller wrote:I'll swing back around to cheeky, but that last page from mini was bad.

In post 622, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 618, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 529, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This game needs an actual good push to get some good discussion going.

I've actually found this game to be quite refreshing so far, with decent discussion with minimal shit posting. Do you just not like any of the current wagons?

Actually i like this.
Competing wagons between Cheeky/Mini makes the game much easier for me to read in terms of finding scum.

In post 628, Vaxkiller wrote:Meaning I could vote for either. Mini talks about cheeky being a scum read, but never votes that way, and questions people about their cheeky read.

The reason I want mini more is because it gives 2 decent town clears.

In post 630, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 628, Vaxkiller wrote:Meaning I could vote for either. Mini talks about cheeky being a scum read, but never votes that way, and questions people about their cheeky read.

The reason I want mini more is because it gives 2 decent town clears.

Ok. But reading your initial comment it came across as: "I will vote Mini now, but am going to vote Cheeky instead later", as in you was only really fine with Cheeky.
Which town clears btw?

In post 519, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:Good to have you here, Quiet.

I'm adding chkflip to my townreads with Norway and Mini.

In post 592, Luca Blight wrote:A possibility that entered my mind when I read the above posts:

Mini: does nothing

In post 158, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: MiniMegabyte
Mini, i distinctly remember your meta as scum is to do literally nothing.

Mini in scum pt: I’m being scumread for doing nothing, what should I do

Scum partner: just look interested by asking questions

Mini: ok.

In post 634, Nero Cain wrote:i could see it. good scum play if u r scum, Luca.

In post 635, PlusJOYED wrote:sorry for inactivity been a tough week irl, what with news and weaning antidepressants and work and medical bills and other personal stuff. Gonna be vla until Sunday.

In post 637, Andresvmb wrote:

@Mod I’m VLA until tonight, just as an FYI.

I thought I would get back to this yesterday but just haven’t had the time. I’ll put some effort like I always do, just need to read carefully is all.

In post 639, Rannygazoo wrote:I’m starting to understand Binatog’s posting pattern. The game can be hard to break into, and there’s lots of little threads that lead nowhere.

Quiet’s defense of mini by asking for references and notarized forms feels like sealioning.

In post 636, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 634, Nero Cain wrote:i could see it. good scum play if u r scum, Luca.

?

In post 617, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 579, BBmolla wrote:

In post 574, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 572, BBmolla wrote:

In post 570, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 566, BBmolla wrote:

In post 548, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 379, BBmolla wrote:nero's bad reads probably make him town tbh

and this is pssible TMI. How does he know the alignments of 5 other players? If not why are my reads "bad"?

lmfao

not helping

your fucking logic is ridiculous here nero do I actually need to explain why it's ridiculous

yes

I know for a fact one of your reads is wrong, and I disagree on another read, so they're bad

I don't need to be clairvoyant about every single one of your reads to call them bad bro

this is very basic and pretty lame. Writing my reads off as bad when you only disagree with yourself and 1 read doesn't make a ton of sense to me. Theoretically speaking it I could have all 4 scum in the pool. I think wondering whether or not this was TMI is a plenty valid concern and your violent reaction is both scummy and dumb. As an example, scum Skitter called my reads "bad" in a game when we were in (I mean they were but still...) so I don't think it's impossible that you could TMI like this as well.

In post 633, quiet wrote: Mini wagon took off since this, plus the long set of questions they posted. Do you still maintain this read?

In post 647, NoPowerOverMe wrote:We are 26 pages in no reason to get too serious about reads yet.