Mafiascum.net

In post 621, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 620, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Still reading post 444.

good luck with that

If esotericzoomer goes over every player, I am not even close as I am only at flow trap.

I don't agree, but I like

Prism, I am available for at least the next 20 minutes. Let's talk.

Dear Prism,

Going to have to be satisfied with phone posting. I don't know if you saw the post where I said I didn't have time tonight, but if that was intentional I'll rise to the challenge regardless.

Didn't read safebet/the E-1 stuff before voting?

Sure, I didn't like the safebet vote as it felt reactionary to the E-1 as an easy target. Your content after that was virtually zero and even though I've scumread safebet more I wanted more out of you. If your vote on safebet was really random that's kind of ?_? to work with.

In post 626, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:VOTE: Prism

In post 166, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Your vote below has given me nothing to respond to. To elaborate, I don't even know why you are scum reading me and, hence, do not have a basis to say that you do not have a reasonable suspicion on me.

Going to have to do more than naked vote if you want this to gain traction.

In post 630, Prism wrote:Going to have to be satisfied with phone posting. I don't know if you saw the post where I said I didn't have time tonight, but if that was intentional I'll rise to the challenge regardless.

Didn't read safebet/the E-1 stuff before voting?

Oh, I didn't see that. Sorry for the interruption. We could talk later.

In post 632, Prism wrote:

In post 626, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:VOTE: Prism

In post 166, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Your vote below has given me nothing to respond to. To elaborate, I don't even know why you are scum reading me and, hence, do not have a basis to say that you do not have a reasonable suspicion on me.

Going to have to do more than naked vote if you want this to gain traction.

Presumptive of you to think I want it to gain traction in the first place.

Nah, let's do it now. If you don't want it to gain traction, who do you actually want to see flipped?

If the vote was for my attention you had me eagerly awaiting dialogue regardless. Puzzling.

In post 635, Prism wrote:Nah, let's do it now. If you don't want it to gain traction, who do you actually want to see flipped?

If the vote was for my attention you had me eagerly awaiting dialogue regardless. Puzzling.

I am perfectly fine with literally any player. And yes, that includes myself.

The vote on you was another random vote. Attempting to rationalise my every move is a futile endeavor.

Anything else you'd like to dialogue about?

I felt I had made my stance about not liking the safebet vote/floo tag-a-long clear but maybe your perception differs.

In post 637, Prism wrote:Anything else you'd like to dialogue about?

I felt I had made my stance about not liking the safebet vote/floo tag-a-long clear but maybe your perception differs.

That part of your perception is very clear to me. Any specifics on why you didn't like it?

I meant to say that part of your stance is very clear to me.

My evaluation of the safebet vote was more of a coin flip first guess, it's naturally scummy but also an easy target to vote if they're town. I didn't at all expect for you to claim it was truly random. I don't really know what to think there. The floo vote I really didn't like on account of you being more experienced (ie. being able to restrain that first instinct about floo's "I didn't want to appear scummy" line)

The vote on me was nice and dramatic but you're not outing reads and claiming to randomly vote on page 26. It's also just bizarre to claim the vote as truly random-you had something you wanted from me in the next post.

This is a tough position to put me in. You're not hardscum at all, mainly by virtue of keeping your cards extremely close. Simultaneously, the better alternative to me is probably safebet and maybe Spartan, the latter of which is a project I was hoping to do tomorrow.

At what point are you planning to really enter the game with your vote and your opinions?

It was nice of you to invite me here and to offer to postpone, but I'm also skeptical that it was an accident given that I gave no indicator that I was around reading, let alone posting.

It might be nitpicky but the fact you instantly responded to me showing up a bit annoyed but took more prompting to engage with the reasoning you asked for is suspect to me. Maybe this is you being nice but you also seem to have already understood a decent part of my vote despite framing the question like my reasoning was unknown?

Like, you chose to A) vote me B) immediately followup with a question you kinda already knew the answer to and C) invite me to a dialogue with a very tight window, with every expectation that I wouldn't be here to answer. Fortunately or unfortunately, I'm an obsessive who struggles to stay away.

Need to drive home now, I'll check on what Frederick says but then I'm probably going to bed. I'll get to anything else anyone asked me tomorrow.

Now I'm having an existential crisis over the fact I typed all of that with from a grocery store parking lot.

Goodnight y'all, see you tomorrow.

In post 640, Prism wrote:My evaluation of the safebet vote was more of a coin flip first guess, it's naturally scummy but also an easy target to vote if they're town. I didn't at all expect for you to claim it was truly random. I don't really know what to think there. The floo vote I really didn't like on account of you being more experienced (ie. being able to restrain that first instinct about floo's "I didn't want to appear scummy" line)

The vote on me was nice and dramatic but you're not outing reads and claiming to randomly vote on page 26. It's also just bizarre to claim the vote as truly random-you had something you wanted from me in the next post.

This is a tough position to put me in. You're not hardscum at all, mainly by virtue of keeping your cards extremely close. Simultaneously, the better alternative to me is probably safebet and maybe Spartan, the latter of which is a project I was hoping to do tomorrow.

At what point are you planning to really enter the game with your vote and your opinions?

When I actually have the time to read the game. I am planning to attempt to do that before the deadline is up.

I was actually voting floo to see what would happen, not because I truly believed they were very probably scum.

As for opinions, I don't formulate them unless it is a rather sure thing.

In post 641, Prism wrote:It was nice of you to invite me here and to offer to postpone, but I'm also skeptical that it was an accident given that I gave no indicator that I was around reading, let alone posting.

It might be nitpicky but the fact you instantly responded to me showing up a bit annoyed but took more prompting to engage with the reasoning you asked for is suspect to me. Maybe this is you being nice but you also seem to have already understood a decent part of my vote despite framing the question like my reasoning was unknown?

Like, you chose to A)

randomly

vote me B) immediately followup with a question you kinda already knew the answer to and C) invite me to a dialogue with a very tight window, with every expectation that I wouldn't be here to answer. Fortunately or unfortunately, I'm an obsessive who struggles to stay away.

Need to drive home now, I'll check on what Frederick says but then I'm probably going to bed. I'll get to anything else anyone asked me tomorrow.

I simply was taking some time off from my homework and decided that maybe we could talk like you wanted to 24 hours ago.

The fact that I instantly responded was because I had promised to be online for 20 minutes. I don't quite have the time to finish reading this post, so, I will stop there.

In post 642, Prism wrote:Now I'm having an existential crisis over the fact I typed all of that with from a grocery store parking lot.

Goodnight y'all, see you tomorrow.

Before I go, it is already 2 in the afternoon, 17 January where I live.

flow trap could you vote enchant or naw

Maybe later

ight