Mafiascum.net

VOTE: Isis

(NM's E-1)

I'm voting Datisi pretty much just for that one post + maybe an internalized expectation that he would obvtown that set his par for course a bit rigged

I think isis is town

cool story

I just had a weird thought, mafia is the only game where people sometimes get acknowledged for being a role simultaneously as it is acknowledged they have that role. Like you can think "this obvtown is good at obvtowning". But you don't ever think like, "this player is scoring so many points, they must be on our team" or "this person is healing so much, they must be our team's healer!"

i love mafia

I appreciate you isis

Not voting is fun.

I appreciate not voting

*good at

should come before "being" in my post

Like - it’s such a weird trajectory to take Isis to NM’s e-1 then unvote when actually taken to e-1 then to say “I think Isis is town.”

In post 634, Infinity 324 wrote:VOTE: penguin

Ty for doing something

In post 636, PenguinPower wrote:Like - it’s such a weird trajectory to take Isis to NM’s e-1 then unvote when actually taken to e-1 then to say “I think Isis is town.”

aren't those descending levels of disfavor? I don't get it. Also you forgot your "in the morning" post

In post 636, PenguinPower wrote:Like - it’s such a weird trajectory to take Isis to NM’s e-1 then unvote when actually taken to e-1 then to say “I think Isis is town.”

Isis posting has been town since then

(since I originally voted)

In post 638, Isis wrote:

In post 636, PenguinPower wrote:Like - it’s such a weird trajectory to take Isis to NM’s e-1 then unvote when actually taken to e-1 then to say “I think Isis is town.”

aren't those descending levels of disfavor? I don't get it. Also you forgot your "in the morning" post

You didn’t do anything in the in between to warrant a change hence weird trajectory.

Checking back because I literally forgot about this post.

In post 557, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 554, Isis wrote:I feel like I wanted to approach this game less spamposty because PP and implo are in it and I don't think it's their style of game. Trying not to multipost when I usually would.

Reminder for me to address this in the morning.

Ah - why do you not think my style of game is spamposty? I’m pretty sure you know it is, and I have already said I prefer spamposty over walling to Datisi in this game.

Correction - i said it to Mena

In post 639, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 636, PenguinPower wrote:Like - it’s such a weird trajectory to take Isis to NM’s e-1 then unvote when actually taken to e-1 then to say “I think Isis is town.”

Isis posting has been town since then

Elucidate me. What specifically did you find towny vs. previous posting?

In post 543, Isis wrote:This response has really bad "I'm scum but that's not why" vibes. The segmenting between "you're wrong" and "you're scum", from these being separate posts, is really troubling. As town the notions would be unified, as scum they'd be separated into steps. I don't actually have an elegant explanation why, I'm just remembering my own town and scum thought processes when I deal with getting pushed. Deciding to push back is a something to be chosen instead of felt

I thought this was towny, I liked the TR on schiavetto and the datisi vote. I didn't necessarily agree with all them, but they felt genuine and I could see where she was coming from

So who’s scum then? You think AFF v. Isis is tvt?

Tomorrow I'll do some ISOs or something and make an actual vote. I did think aaron calling out datisi for not questioning him when datisi was questioning other people was a bit nitpicky, but nothing else has really bothered me from aaron

In post 641, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 638, Isis wrote:

In post 636, PenguinPower wrote:Like - it’s such a weird trajectory to take Isis to NM’s e-1 then unvote when actually taken to e-1 then to say “I think Isis is town.”

aren't those descending levels of disfavor? I don't get it. Also you forgot your "in the morning" post

You didn’t do anything in the in between to warrant a change hence weird trajectory.

Checking back because I literally forgot about this post.

I read my own posts and I kind of agree, but IMO getting a town delta during the time between his vote and his unvote would be more suspicious than getting a town delta on the time between the unvote and deeming me town.

I don't get why you phrased it like, : look at this graph!

Re: spam, in most of my games I'm both high activity and pretty voluminous, so by spam I mostly meant my actual volume.

Maybe I have you wrong and you're fine with just about anything as long as it's less than a hundred words per post.

pedit 3 pedits

I’m not approaching this from a math standpoint and my terminology is not math related. Didn’t mean for that to come across as look at this graph.

I am fine with hundreds - nay thousands of posts - that are not very large. Easier for my brain to pay attention to.